Crap, I didn't notice the stupid CC. Oh well, I won't authorize it so
gmane should trap it.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://
Balaji V. Iyer wrote:
[snip]
I'm used to building in a separate directory. Say I've unpacked the
tarball in my home directory, I would do something like:
$ mkdir gcc-build
$ cd gcc-build
$ ../gcc-4.0.2/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-4.0.2 --enable-languages=c
(And a few more flags but I've om
Thank you Ian. I did the modification you mentioned...now I am running
into more problems.
Now it is failing somewhere in libiberty.. here is the exact message (I
just simply typed "make all install") (I get same messae when I just do
"make")
Configuring in fixincludes
configure: loading cache ./
"Balaji V. Iyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am trying to do some development on the C Compiler in Cygwin and I
> am doing the following to build it:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the wrong mailing list. Please send any further
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks.
> $ ../gcc-4.0.2/gcc/configure
Hello Everyone,
I am trying to do some development on the C Compiler in Cygwin and I
am doing the following to build it:
$ ../gcc-4.0.2/gcc/configure
--prefix=/home/Balaji/Software_Tools/install --enable-languages="c"
The problem i am getting is this:
$ make all install
TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Paul-Kenji Cahier wrote:
Greetings, Paul-Kenji,
?LC_ALL set to C.UTF-8 in all cases. Cygwin freshly installed.
?Also tried LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8(which shouldnt exist) and it did
?not work either.
?Newlib uses "C-UTF-8", not "C.UTF-8" for some reason. I don't see that
?newli
NightStrike wrote:
> I'm pretty sure it's not writable on any system, let alone cygwin.
> It's not a real filesystem per se. It's instead a read-only gateway
> into the kernel.
What? No. The entire /proc/sys tree on Linux is writable, which allows
you to tune a great number of kernel parameter
On 3/4/08, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 4 10:12, Jeff Fulmer wrote:
> > I'd like to access and write to the /proc file system from a java program.
> > Can somebody steer me in the right direction? I'm starting to feel that
> > I've exhausted my search options...
>
> /proc i
On Mar 4 13:52, Karl M wrote:
> 4) I run bash from a cmd window (XP SP2), with CYGWIN=tty on both machines.
^^^
That's what I was missing.
Should be fixed in the next test release which I'll prepar
>> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 13:54:18 +0100
>> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: [experimental] cygwin-1.5.25-10
>>
>> On Mar 3 21:33, Robin Walker wrote:
>>> --On 03 March 2008 11:46 + Robin Walker wrote:
>>>
I noticed the same with 1.5.25-9 last night. It's not just calls to
localho
> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 13:54:18 +0100
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: [experimental] cygwin-1.5.25-10
>
> On Mar 3 21:33, Robin Walker wrote:
>> --On 03 March 2008 11:46 + Robin Walker wrote:
>>
>>> I noticed the same with 1.5.25-9 last
According to POSIX (and as implemented on Linux):
$ rm -Rf t
$ touch t/
touch: setting times of `t/': No such file or directory
$ : > t/
t/: Is a directory.
The ENOENT failure is correct, since you are using the syntax to open (or
create) a directory but are not going through mkdir. However, o
Yeah. RS232C can operate in many different ways, using the various "wires"
differently. Opening a serial port is just the beginning of the work; then
there is deciding what signals and handshake to use. Ohthe good ol' days.
Charles Stepp
Meskimen's Law:
There's never time to do it rite, but
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 10:57:20PM -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote:
>[snip obfuscated disclaimer]
You apparently received a bounce message telling you that we don't
accept the type of disclaimers found in a message you attempted to send
here. So, you just added some dots to the disclaimer.
This is una
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 04:29:15PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Mar 4 10:12, Jeff Fulmer wrote:
>> I'd like to access and write to the /proc file system from a java program.
>> Can somebody steer me in the right direction? I'm starting to feel that
>> I've exhausted my search options...
>
>/
On Mar 4 10:12, Jeff Fulmer wrote:
> I'd like to access and write to the /proc file system from a java program.
> Can somebody steer me in the right direction? I'm starting to feel that
> I've exhausted my search options...
/proc is not writable on Cygwin.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
I'd like to access and write to the /proc file system from a java program.
Can somebody steer me in the right direction? I'm starting to feel that
I've exhausted my search options...
TIA,
Jeff
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin
On 04 March 2008 03:57, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> Top posting, sorry.
Shift, Ctrl+End, delete. It's an awful lot less keypresses than an
apology!
Oh, should mention BTW that those disclaimers are utterly without basis
and invalid and are in fact barred on sourceware.org mailing lists. I
notice
On Mar 4 06:40, Eric Blake wrote:
> | I was thinking cygwin goal was to emulate as much as possible posix
> | spec.
>
> Yes, and cygwin's behavior in this case is still POSIX compliant.
Right. The error code in question is this:
[EINVAL]
The owner or group ID supplied is not a value suppo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Matthieu CASTET on 3/4/2008 6:28 AM:
| Also according to my posix reading [1], chown should be able to change
perm to
| any uid/gid.
You read wrong. POSIX also allows chown implementations to impose
additional restrictions. And on cygw
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
>
> On Feb 29 09:16, Matthieu CASTET wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Why do you want to fake security when yoi can get the real thing?
>
For the same reason that fakeroot is used on UNIX : I want to create images with
special unix right.
Also according to my posix read
On Mar 3 21:33, Robin Walker wrote:
> --On 03 March 2008 11:46 + Robin Walker wrote:
>
>> I noticed the same with 1.5.25-9 last night. It's not just calls to
>> localhost: it's ssh calls to anywhere that hang: in other words, it's a
>> client-side problem, not server-side. I noticed that the
>>?LC_ALL set to C.UTF-8 in all cases. Cygwin freshly installed.
>>?Also tried LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8(which shouldnt exist) and it did
>>?not work either.
>?Newlib uses "C-UTF-8", not "C.UTF-8" for some reason. I don't see that
>?newlib understands the dot. Moreover, Cygwin doesn't support utf-8 yet
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION
===
Homepage: http://freshmeat.net/projects/qsf
License : GPL
Quick Spam Filter (qsf) is a lightweight statistical spam filter. It
is designed to be small, fast, reliable, easy to install, and simple
to use in a procmail recipe. For these reasons it is not writ
On Mar 4 03:59, Paul-Kenji Cahier wrote:
http://cygwin/com/acronyms/#TOFU
> LC_ALL set to C.UTF-8 in all cases. Cygwin freshly installed.
> Also tried LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8(which shouldnt exist) and it did
> not work either.
Newlib uses "C-UTF-8", not "C.UTF-8" for some reason. I don't see that
n
On Mar 3 22:57, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> Is there a way around the permission check on the private key files for the
> ssh client?
>
> The key files are on a mapped drive for the domain controller. The domain
> controller was switched to samba who reports:
> [...]
> But in reality the files are 600
26 matches
Mail list logo
