Steve Slany wants to add you as a connection on Pulse.
To accept this connection request, go to:
http://pulse.plaxo.com/pulse/invite/?i=7406956&k=1630893471&l=en
Thanks!
The Pulse team
---
What's Pulse? It's a new way to stay connected and share stuff with the people
in your life.
The people y
I came up with a simple Ruby snippet that reproduces the problem. I'd
appreciate it if other Cygwin users would try it. You can change the
"cause_failure = true" line to say false and it will run.
--urandom_test.rb--
# Test failure of reading /dev/urandom after failed require
# this method is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:35:53 -0800,
> Brian Dessent wrote:
>
>> Dave Korn wrote:
>>
>>> Same reason as strace, I would assume: it's a DOS-based program,
>>> not a cygwin one.
>> I think you mean "it's a MSVCRT-based program"
>
> I
test.pl:
$childpid=fork;
die "failed to fork" if (!defined $childpid);
if (! $childpid) {
close STDIN;
close STDOUT;
close STDERR;
exec "make -f test.mk &>test.out";
}
test.mk:
var=$(shell echo foobar | cat)
default:
@echo "$(var)"
Running "make -f tes
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 02:38:28PM -, Dave Korn wrote:
>On 21 December 2007 12:41, Alexey Lyubimov wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Brian!
>> But what would be the "final" decision? As far as I
>> understand 1.5.x branch MUST support Win98. Am I
>> right?
>> Should I wait for 1.5.25-8 (where hard dependenci
On 21 December 2007 12:41, Alexey Lyubimov wrote:
> Thanks, Brian!
> But what would be the "final" decision? As far as I
> understand 1.5.x branch MUST support Win98. Am I
> right?
> Should I wait for 1.5.25-8 (where hard dependencies on
> NT-dll would be removed, I hope) or should I downgrade
> t
Eric Lilja wrote:
> Of course it's native windows program without any dependency
> on cygwin1.dll
Oh yes! only now I have realized:
$ cygcheck /bin/cygcheck.exe
C:\cygwin\bin/cygcheck.exe
C:\WINDOWS\system32\msvcrt.dll
C:\WINDOWS\system32\KERNEL32.dll
C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll
Thanks, Brian!
But what would be the "final" decision? As far as I
understand 1.5.x branch MUST support Win98. Am I
right?
Should I wait for 1.5.25-8 (where hard dependencies on
NT-dll would be removed, I hope) or should I downgrade
to some previous 1.5.25-x?
--
Alexey
Brian Dessent wrote:
>The
Hi Jeff,
I registered an account, just to thank you. I was looking for this
information everywhere and couldn't find the answer. Now it works perfect
for me!
kind regards,
TD
Jeff Lange wrote:
>
> I use a bat file that looks like this:
>
>
> @echo off
> c:
> chdir c:\cygwin\bin
Angelo, think about. Of course it's native windows program without any
dependency on cygwin1.dll. It's supposed to be able to inspect your
cygwin installation even when it's so hosed that you can't even launch a
bash shell. Thus, it's a pure windows program and generates line breaks
the way all
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:35:53 -0800,
Brian Dessent wrote:
>Dave Korn wrote:
>
>> Same reason as strace, I would assume: it's a DOS-based program,
>> not a cygwin one.
>
>I think you mean "it's a MSVCRT-based program"
I guess that's one way to describe them. I've heard them described as
"nati
Dave Korn wrote:
> Same reason as strace, I would assume: it's a DOS-based program,
> not a cygwin one.
I only use 'cygcheck' that comes with Cygwin!
Brian Dessent wrote:
> I think you mean "it's a MSVCRT-based program"
Does this mean that the 'cygcheck' has used MSVCRT-based program
to bu
12 matches
Mail list logo
