Dave Korn wrote:
[...] toiletless[*] in this matter.
[...]
[*] - Y'know. Nothing to go on.
snicker
regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden+1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC/Ltd http://www.holdenweb.com
Skype: holdenweb http://del.icio.us/steve.holden
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jam One on 8/21/2007 7:37 PM:
> I have downloaded the recent copy of cygwin and there
> is no "bash.exe" in the cygwin/bin directory, yet the
> cygwin.bat file points to the bash command.
>
> What is your recommendation?
Follow the direc
Hi,
Jam One wrote:
I have downloaded the recent copy of cygwin and there
is no "bash.exe" in the cygwin/bin directory, yet the
cygwin.bat file points to the bash command.
you have to install bash after installing cygwin.
Erich
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simpl
I have downloaded the recent copy of cygwin and there
is no "bash.exe" in the cygwin/bin directory, yet the
cygwin.bat file points to the bash command.
I have been using cygwin for many years now and this
is the first time I have encountered this problem. If
bash is no longer supplied with cygwin,
On 21 August 2007 21:49, Brian Dessent wrote:
> Bobby McNulty wrote:
>
>> I was waiting for someone to notice it under winsup. That is where this one
>> is at. I am not running a snapshot of the cygwin dll. Though I will try that
>> next.
>
> This has nothing to do with the Cygwin DLL, or the v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Reini Urban on 8/21/2007 3:26 PM:
>> This is a minor patch release. It attempts to add some
>> case-insensitivity
>> smarts to mv, cp, and install. In other words, 'mv a A' should now cause
>> the file to be renamed, rather than reportin
Eric Blake schrieb:
A new release of coreutils, 6.9-5, is available for experimental use,
leaving 6.9-4 as current.
NEWS:
=
This is a minor patch release. It attempts to add some case-insensitivity
smarts to mv, cp, and install. In other words, 'mv a A' should now cause
the file to be rena
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A new release of coreutils, 6.9-5, is available for experimental use,
leaving 6.9-4 as current.
NEWS:
=
This is a minor patch release. It attempts to add some case-insensitivity
smarts to mv, cp, and install. In other words, 'mv a A' should now
Bobby McNulty wrote:
> I was waiting for someone to notice it under winsup. That is where this
> one is at.
> I am not running a snapshot of the cygwin dll. Though I will try that next.
This has nothing to do with the Cygwin DLL, or the version of gcc. It's
an issue with how the various configur
Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> So the question is: Should setup give a warning that the lst.gz file
> was corrupted, suggesting to remove it?
>
> But perhaps, the simplest solution should be to remove the 'Cancel' button
> from setup...
Thanks for the report. Setup should neither fail to clean up aft
Dave Korn wrote:
On 21 August 2007 20:31, Bobby McNulty wrote:
configure: loading cache .././config.cache
configure: error: `CFLAGS' has changed since the previous run:
configure: former value: -O2 -O2
configure: current value: -O2 -O2
configure: error: `CXXFLAGS' has changed since the
On 21 August 2007 20:31, Bobby McNulty wrote:
> configure: loading cache .././config.cache
> configure: error: `CFLAGS' has changed since the previous run:
> configure: former value: -O2 -O2
> configure: current value: -O2 -O2
> configure: error: `CXXFLAGS' has changed since the previous run
While building the cygwin1.dll, from CVS, I get the following just as it
is configuring in they cygwin and winsup areas. newlib built just fine.
configure: configuring in cygwin
configure: running /bin/sh '../../../../s
On 21 August 2007 19:58, PTBluster wrote:
> Dave, Greg:
> Thanks for checking. Also IROffer/cygcrypt-0.dll trogan was not detected by
> my scans with Spybot or AVG.
> The strange thing is that IROffer seems to be a ligit trogan and has been
> part of Ad-aware's defs since at least mid 2006. Perhap
Dave, Greg:
Thanks for checking. Also IROffer/cygcrypt-0.dll trogan was not detected by
my scans with Spybot or AVG.
The strange thing is that IROffer seems to be a ligit trogan and has been
part of Ad-aware's defs since at least mid 2006. Perhaps a recent update is
causing the problem; it wasn't
A new upstream release with minor feature fixes.
Cygwin build changes:
minor
Changes:
See http://mathomatic.orgserve.de/changes.txt
Minor code, documentation, and makefile improvements.
7/28/07 - Added "tests/quartic.in" and fixed incomplete simplification
in the calculate command.
8/3/07 - Allo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Thorsten Kampe on 8/21/2007 9:52 AM:
> This seems to have changed as nowadays applications just silently
> return without any visible error. I have to run "strace app" to see
> the same error I used to see without strace.
Run the proble
On 21 August 2007 16:56, Greg Chicares wrote:
> On 2007-08-21 15:27Z, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 21 August 2007 16:05, Dave Korn wrote:
>>
>>> On 21 August 2007 15:52, PTBluster wrote:
>>>
I just ran Ad-aware and got a hit for the IROffer object which uses
cygcrypt-0.dll. I've searched Ad-
On 21 August 2007 16:53, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is more like an observation an not a problem: in the past I
> noticed some third party applications compiled against Cygwin that
> wouldn't because of missing dependencies/DLLs. This was quite obvious
> as I got a big pop-up saying som
On 2007-08-21 15:27Z, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 21 August 2007 16:05, Dave Korn wrote:
>
>> On 21 August 2007 15:52, PTBluster wrote:
>>
>>> I just ran Ad-aware and got a hit for the IROffer object which uses
>>> cygcrypt-0.dll. I've searched Ad-ware forum and with Google but could not
>>> find much.
Hi,
this is more like an observation an not a problem: in the past I
noticed some third party applications compiled against Cygwin that
wouldn't because of missing dependencies/DLLs. This was quite obvious
as I got a big pop-up saying something like "cannot find cygwhatever-
x.y.dll". Then I co
On Aug 21 17:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 21 15:37, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> > [Cygwin latest snapshot]
> >
> > I just noticed (on two different Windows XP) Cygwin installation that
> > Shebang shell scripts are not executable on FAT32 volumes
> > [...]
> > Is that expected behaviour?
>
>
On 21 August 2007 16:05, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 21 August 2007 15:52, PTBluster wrote:
>
>> I just ran Ad-aware and got a hit for the IROffer object which uses
>> cygcrypt-0.dll. I've searched Ad-ware forum and with Google but could not
>> find much. I think cygcrypt-0.dll is a legit library file
* yitzle (Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:42:24 -0400)
> On 8/21/07, Thorsten Kampe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just noticed (on two different Windows XP) Cygwin installation that
> > Shebang shell scripts are not executable on FAT32 volumes (like usb
> > drives). The mount man page says "Normally, files
On 21 August 2007 15:52, PTBluster wrote:
> I just ran Ad-aware and got a hit for the IROffer object which uses
> cygcrypt-0.dll. I've searched Ad-ware forum and with Google but could not
> find much. I think cygcrypt-0.dll is a legit library file so I am wondering
> if this hit is significant?
> Jonathan C Allen writes:
> PACKAGE DESCRIPTION
> ===
> ncftp - An improved FTP client
A diff between the package listing of the last version and the new
version shows that all the documentation and man pages are missing.
It looks like a packaging bug to me.
Pr
On Aug 21 15:37, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> [Cygwin latest snapshot]
>
> I just noticed (on two different Windows XP) Cygwin installation that
> Shebang shell scripts are not executable on FAT32 volumes (like usb
> drives). The mount man page says "Normally, files ending in certain
> extensions (.
I just ran Ad-aware and got a hit for the IROffer object which uses
cygcrypt-0.dll. I've searched Ad-ware forum and with Google but could not
find much. I think cygcrypt-0.dll is a legit library file so I am wondering
if this hit is significant?
Ad-aware SE
Ad-aware Def: 20.08.2007
cygcrypt-0.dll
On 20 August 2007 22:53, Aaron Gray wrote:
Why is it different from gcc-4.2.0's ?
Okay I am kicking myself now many hours wasted it was because I used a
Windows program WinRAR to unpack my work rather than using tar !!!
It was a permissions problem afterall.
Very sorry for poluting your mail
On 8/21/07, Thorsten Kampe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Cygwin latest snapshot]
>
> I just noticed (on two different Windows XP) Cygwin installation that
> Shebang shell scripts are not executable on FAT32 volumes (like usb
> drives). The mount man page says "Normally, files ending in certain
> ex
[Cygwin latest snapshot]
I just noticed (on two different Windows XP) Cygwin installation that
Shebang shell scripts are not executable on FAT32 volumes (like usb
drives). The mount man page says "Normally, files ending in certain
extensions (.exe, .com, .bat, .cmd) are assumed to be execut
I have observed this problem with setup.exe 2.575, 2.573.2.2 and 2.578
(but, perhaps it is not a stricly setup problem).
Usually when one has some experimental package installed, setup, while
installing some other package, tries to reinstall the 'Cur' package. So
one should click to keep the exp.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Tom Rodman on 8/20/2007 5:58 PM:
> These steps 'hide bash', so invoking bash again fails:
>
> /tmp $ uname -a
> CYGWIN_NT-5.0 argon 1.5.24(0.156/4/2) 2007-01-31 10:57 i686 Cygwin
> /tmp $ tar tvf bar.tar
> drwxrwxr-x staffuser1/XY
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Rainer Stamen on 8/21/2007 2:09 AM:
> Hi,
>
> I try to compile a program which contains a call to
> "get_current_dir_name". The compiler complains that the fucntion is
> undeclared.
Probably because cygwin does not declare a function by
Dave Korn wrote:
On 16 August 2007 16:31, George wrote:
I'm at a loss as to what could be holding up the python dll. Is there
any advice for how to find this?
Install "Process Explorer" from Sysinternals (now part of microsoft). It
has a search function that lets you search all processes
I just downloaded the source and compiled it, *without changing anything*,
and the resulting binary worked without problems.
The final binary also has only 526kb, much smaller than the one I got from
the same binary package. (I was expecting +- the same output)
Hope it helps
Thanks
--
Ped
Attached cygcheck output
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 10:57:52PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
>
>
> Hello.
>
>
> I can't run latest mutt, version mutt-1.4.2.2-1 on my XP. For every
> operation I try to do I get an error like 'cannot create temporary file'.
> It's not a permission problem... files ar
On 20 August 2007 22:53, Aaron Gray wrote:
>> Why is it different from gcc-4.2.0's ?
>
> Okay I am kicking myself now many hours wasted it was because I used a
> Windows program WinRAR to unpack my work rather than using tar !!!
>
> It was a permissions problem afterall.
>
> Very sorry for polu
Hi,
I try to compile a program which contains a call to
"get_current_dir_name". The compiler complains that the fucntion is
undeclared. From checking the archives I learned that the problem
existed already in the past. However the proposed fix (add #define
_GNU_SOURCE) seems not to work for
39 matches
Mail list logo
