-- no help. I updated Win32::GUI via
CPAN -- no help.
20070511-180215 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~
$ win32-gui-demos.pl
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
David
[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: perl-Win32-GUI-1.04-1
From: Reini Urban
To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 16:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:52:33PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:56:21PM -0500, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
For the Cygwin folks, it is really a good idea to have the preferred
usage of the logo docu
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:52:33PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:56:21PM -0500, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
>>> For the Cygwin folks, it is really a good idea to have the preferred
>>> usage of the logo documented in an easily accessible lo
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:56:21PM -0500, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
>> For the Cygwin folks, it is really a good idea to have the preferred
>> usage of the logo documented in an easily accessible location. This
>> long, drawn out, emotional thread has shown that nobody
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 02:42:33PM -0700, Alexander Sotirov wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>Nobody seemed to care. Considering the fact that MD5 collisions are
>>>now trivial to generate, it probably doesn't matter much anyways - the
>>>fact that your copy of setup.exe has the right MD5 doesn
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:56:21PM -0500, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
>For the Cygwin folks, it is really a good idea to have the preferred
>usage of the logo documented in an easily accessible location. This
>long, drawn out, emotional thread has shown that nobody really knows
>how someone can lega
Hello,
This is a simple program that I compile as a console application in
Visual Studio 2005 :
--
#include
#include
LONG WINAPI my_exception_filter (LPEXCEPTION_POINTERS exceptionInfo)
{
printf ("*** my_exception_filter ***\n");
return EXCEPTION_E
[ - - words - - ]
Try these
http://www.redhat.com/software/cygwin/
http://www.uspto.gov/index.html (I didn't find anything under Cygwin
or RedHat and the stuff I found searching for Cygnus was not related
to this project at all).
Also, http://www.registeringatrademark.com/trademark-law-basics.
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> Nobody seemed to care. Considering the fact that MD5 collisions are now
>> trivial
>> to generate, it probably doesn't matter much anyways - the fact that your
>> copy
>> of setup.exe has the right MD5 doesn't mean that it hasn't been tampered
>> with.
>
> We don't
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:58:59PM -0700, Alexander Sotirov wrote:
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Cygwin mirrors have in their toplevel a setup.exe and an md5.sum. The
>>> m5sum is
>>>
>>> ae1944f528338033bab3b4710d5bd736 setup.bz2
>>> b31ddcef84f25919a5d3184167b4a90d setup.exe
>>> 0503
(Sorry if that arrives twice: My mail client is acting up and giving
wrong sender addresses: I therefore send it again, since I don't see
the first post arriving probably because of that.
My general apology to all: That will be my last post to the list in
that sorry affair and if Dave or Chr
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:58:59PM -0700, Alexander Sotirov wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Cygwin mirrors have in their toplevel a setup.exe and an md5.sum. The
>> m5sum is
>>
>> ae1944f528338033bab3b4710d5bd736 setup.bz2
>> b31ddcef84f25919a5d3184167b4a90d setup.exe
>> 0503889504b7ff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Cygwin mirrors have in their toplevel a setup.exe and an md5.sum. The
> m5sum is
>
> ae1944f528338033bab3b4710d5bd736 setup.bz2
> b31ddcef84f25919a5d3184167b4a90d setup.exe
> 0503889504b7ff0b23e65586a522b3ad setup.ini
>
> whereas the setup.exe has actually the
Some hours ago I noticed something strange:
Cygwin mirrors have in their toplevel a setup.exe and an md5.sum. The
m5sum is
ae1944f528338033bab3b4710d5bd736 setup.bz2
b31ddcef84f25919a5d3184167b4a90d setup.exe
0503889504b7ff0b23e65586a522b3ad setup.ini
whereas the setup.exe has actual
On 11 May 2007 19:34, ls-cygwin-2006 wrote:
> "Dave Korn" writes:
>
>> On 11 May 2007 18:25, ls-cygwin-2006 wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>
>> You need to get it in writing, from Redhat's legal dept.
>
> Fine. Even links to the Cygwin FAQ (if it had such a section touching
> on the topic)? I'm a tad
"Dave Korn" writes:
> On 11 May 2007 18:25, ls-cygwin-2006 wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> You need to get it in writing, from Redhat's legal dept.
Fine. Even links to the Cygwin FAQ (if it had such a section touching
on the topic)? I'm a tad surprised.
> Nothing else is worth your time and effort.
* (Fri, 11 May 2007 19:25:01 +0200)
> Actually I seriously resent that you trying to portrait me as a fool
> who doesn't know what he doing. That coming from a visible member of
> the Cygwin project will certainly keep any others from giving any
> useful hints on that topic in this thread, after y
What explains this peculiar behavior of max_memory and heap_chunk_in_mb?
Following the instructions at:
http://www.cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/setup-maxmem.html, I increased
Cygwin's memory limit to 1024MB:
$ regtool -i set /HKLM/Software/Cygnus\ Solutions/Cygwin/heap_chunk_in_mb 1024
and after cl
On 11 May 2007 18:25, ls-cygwin-2006 wrote:
[snip]
You need to get it in writing, from Redhat's legal dept. Nothing else is
worth your time and effort. To the best of my knowledge there has never been
any discussion before of anything remotely like this issue on the mailing
list. I think the
Dear Christopher Faylor,
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:13:12AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Nonetheless I continue to be thankful for anybody's input (esp. if I
>>just missed a plainly visible and well known document on that topic
>>somewhere).
>
> It is unclear to me what kind of insight y
On 10 May 2007 17:06, John J. Culkin wrote:
> I tried putting UMask commands in both places and neither seem to have
> any effect on files created by sftp
Ah.
http://www.derkeiler.com/Newsgroups/comp.security.ssh/2005-09/0093.html
http://www.derkeiler.com/Newsgroups/comp.security.ssh/2005-09/0
I use it daily.
A tip to fix or remove fACL's: first fix the directory, then the file.
2007/5/11, John J. Culkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Has anyone tried using setfacl so set ACL's on files?
John J. Culkin wrote:
> I tried putting UMask commands in both places and neither seem to have
> any effe
Has anyone tried using setfacl so set ACL's on files?
-- John C.
John J. Culkin wrote:
I tried putting UMask commands in both places and neither seem to have
any effect on files created by sftp
-- John C.
--
John J. Culkin Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED] The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Matt Marnell on 5/10/2007 11:17 PM:
> So I have uninstalled/reinstalled several times from several mirrors and
> am still getting the same errors. My condition appears identical to the
> below. I have attached my setup.log.full file and
24 matches
Mail list logo
