On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 03:18:13PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
>Linda Walsh wrote:
>>I didn't see Science Guy mention procexp? Um, hey, S.G., are you using
>>Process Explorer?
>
>There are probably other programs that use the same technique and cause
>the same effect, like windows update.
>
>>I re
Linda Walsh wrote:
[snip]
>Vim 7 seems to still have a few kinks to work out and doesn't
> seem nearly as stable as vim64. Since vim7 is already out as vim,
> maybe vim6.4 could be made available as a separete vim6 or vim64
> package for those not wanting to be on the bleeding edge?
It is ava
Linda Walsh wrote:
> I didn't see Science Guy mention procexp? Um, hey, S.G.,
> are you using Process Explorer?
There are probably other programs that use the same technique and cause
the same effect, like windows update.
> I remember the ProcExp bug, but it only happened when I tried t
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I have updated the version of vim on cygwin.com to 7.0.017-1.
This is the long awaited vim 7.0, latest patchlevel 17. Cygwin Vim
still builds from the vanilla sources.
---
Vim 7 seems to still have a few kinks to work out and doesn't
seem nearly as stable as vim64
Brian Dessent wrote:
Science Guy wrote:
This problem has been noted before by someone else,
http://www.mail-archive.com/cygwin@cygwin.com/msg37532.html
but I followed the threads and can find no resolution.
When I fire-up a cygwin bash window, everything is fine for a few minutes.
--On 16 June 2006 16:49 -0400 "Hochstedler, Ben (GE Healthcare)" wrote:
fork() can fail when the system runs out of non-interactive heap space
(because there's not enough heap memory to allocate to the launched
process).
If we, as end-users, suffer from fork() failing for the above reason, whi
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Igor Peshansky wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Jim Easton wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Tue, 16 May 2006 I wrote:
> > > Would someone please tell me what file(s) I would have to take with
> > > me (eg. on a disk) to someone else's machine, both running windows XP,
> > > whereby I cou
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Jim Easton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tue, 16 May 2006 I wrote:
> > Would someone please tell me what file(s) I would have to take with
> > me (eg. on a disk) to someone else's machine, both running windows XP,
> > whereby I could get setup to download the same cygwin components that
>
Just sending the OPs reply so that it is in the mailing list archive.
Mark Hessling wrote:
Mark Hessling wrote:
Actually, what you describe is clear enough, but since CRLF handling
isn't done by the Linux version of sed either, you would have the same
problem on Linux. The question here is how
Hi,
Tue, 16 May 2006 I wrote:
> Would someone please tell me what file(s) I would have to take with
> me (eg. on a disk) to someone else's machine, both running windows XP,
> whereby I could get setup to download the same cygwin components that
> are on my machine?
Wed, 17 May 2006 I wrote:
> I s
10 matches
Mail list logo
