On Sun, 9 Apr 2006, Dave Korn wrote:
On 08 April 2006 01:30, Peter A. Castro wrote:
This is quite strange. It says it was added April 7th, 2006, yet its got
10 reviews, all dated quite some time before then (version 1.3.22-1 and
12-Nov-2003) and also lists 173,253 downloads. It also says the
On 08 April 2006 01:30, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> This is quite strange. It says it was added April 7th, 2006, yet its got
> 10 reviews, all dated quite some time before then (version 1.3.22-1 and
> 12-Nov-2003) and also lists 173,253 downloads. It also says the
> publisher is "Cygnus Solutions".
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 01:58:27AM +0700, Alexander J. Herrmann wrote:
>
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>>On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 02:12:32PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>>Guy Larri wrote:
gprof reports run times 1.56 times too fast on some machines under
cygwin. On another cygwin inst
Ugh, top-posting... Reformatted.
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Mark A. Ziesemer wrote:
> > From: Igor Peshansky cs.nyu.edu>
> > Subject: Re: sshd_conf and AllowGroups - how to make work with non-primary
> > groups?
> > Newsgroups: gmane.os.cygwin
> > Date: 2006-03-01 16:55:50 GMT (5 weeks, 3 days and 19
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 02:12:32PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
Guy Larri wrote:
gprof reports run times 1.56 times too fast on some machines under cygwin.
On another cygwin installation it reports the correct run time.
Yikes! Now Cygwin is too
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 02:12:32PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>Guy Larri wrote:
>>gprof reports run times 1.56 times too fast on some machines under cygwin.
>>On another cygwin installation it reports the correct run time.
>
>Yikes! Now Cygwin is too fast!! Please someone do *something* to
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 01:25:13PM -0400, Luis P Caamano wrote:
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: (J. David Boyd)
>> To: cygwin
>> Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 16:29:59 -0400
>> Subject: Re: when is using cygserver recommended? (thx)
>> Christopher Faylor writes:
>>
>> >
>> > In that ca
Guy Larri wrote:
Dear Cygwin'ers
gprof reports run times 1.56 times too fast on some machines under cygwin.
On another cygwin installation it reports the correct run time.
Yikes! Now Cygwin is too fast!! Please someone do *something* to slow it
down! This is just not acceptable!!! ;-)
-
Never mind. I just made a rookie mistake and looked in the wrong
location for the file. The tools below helped me solve the problem.
User Waldo wrote:
I found cron-config and cron_diagnose.sh and did find some problems
and fixed those, but I still can't seem to get cron to acutally run a
job
User Waldo wrote:
I thought I had everything setup correctly to run cron jobs.
I can not get anything I put in crontab -e to run.
I've attached my cygcheck.out. If someone can give me some ideas I
would much appreciate it.
It's always important to say *how* something doesn't work for you wh
I found cron-config and cron_diagnose.sh and did find some problems and
fixed those, but I still can't seem to get cron to acutally run a job as
simple as creating a file with touch file name.
User Waldo wrote:
I thought I had everything setup correctly to run cron jobs.
I can not get anythi
Oanh Trinh wrote:
Hi all,
I am new to cygwin and I am trying yo port an
application from Linux to MS Windows. This application
is linked with librt.a library in Linux, however this
library is not available under cygwin. Is there any
substitution library under cygwin or is there anyway
to work ar
I think I found part of the problem...
I found the source for "id" which calls either "getgroups()" or
"getugroups()" depending upon the usage (if passed without or with a
specific username, respectively). getugroups() is the one with the
problem. It uses setgrent() / getgrent() / endgrent()
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (J. David Boyd)
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 16:29:59 -0400
> Subject: Re: when is using cygserver recommended? (thx)
> Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
> > In that case, my previous reply is
>
> Thank you very much - much appreciated.
>
> Version 4.2.27 had the same problem but 4.3.0 worked.
Glad I could help. Hmm, even though 4.3.0 is marked
alpha quality upstream, compared to stable 4.2.27,
maybe I should go ahead and make 4.3.0 the current
version for cygwin, since there have be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter A. Castro wrote:
>
> This is quite strange. It says it was added April 7th, 2006, yet its got
> 10 reviews, all dated quite some time before then (version 1.3.22-1 and
> 12-Nov-2003) and also lists 173,253 downloads. It also says the
> publish
On receiving this message, Paul Eggert of the coreutils group suggested
I send this information to the cygwin mailing list, since he is using
the Linux version.
The message at the bottom shows my original report to Paul along with
his demonstration of ptx working as expected.
The message abo
Hi Eric,
Thank you very much - much appreciated.
Version 4.2.27 had the same problem but 4.3.0 worked.
I also learned a bit more about how to use setup. :-)
I also didn't even know of the existance of cygcheck.
It's a bad day when you don't learn something :-)
I'm not sure what the significan
18 matches
Mail list logo
