>From: Kirk Hilliard
>Date: 03 Mar 2006 15:51:21 -0500
> On Mar 3 21:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> Is that a native Windows emacs? A Cygwin emacs shouldn't have any
>> problem.
>
> No, it is the cygwin emacs.
>
>``run emacs'' fails with
> 12 [main] emacs 900 C:\cygwin\bin\emacs.exe: *
Hi.
The jikes provided in Cygwin package jikes-1.22-1 fails to build GNU Classpath
[1], reporting input files not found during compilation.
Local build of jikes 1.22 with the following patch for Cygwin applied:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1202863&group_id=128803&ati
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roberto Bagnara wrote:
Tim Prince wrote:
Roberto Bagnara wrote:
Hi there,
the following little program
#include
int main() {
double d;
scanf("%lf", &d);
printf("%.1000g\n", d);
return 0;
}
does this on Linux/i686
$ gcc -W -Wall in.c
$ a.out
70.9
70.90
skaller wrote:
On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 12:44 +0100, Roberto Bagnara wrote:
Tim Prince wrote:
My
past reading of various relevant documents convinced me that digits
beyond the 17th in formatting of doubles are not required by any
standard to be consistent between implementations. They have no
On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 12:44 +0100, Roberto Bagnara wrote:
> Tim Prince wrote:
> My
> > past reading of various relevant documents convinced me that digits
> > beyond the 17th in formatting of doubles are not required by any
> > standard to be consistent between implementations. They have no us
Tim Prince wrote:
Roberto Bagnara wrote:
Hi there,
the following little program
#include
int main() {
double d;
scanf("%lf", &d);
printf("%.1000g\n", d);
return 0;
}
does this on Linux/i686
$ gcc -W -Wall in.c
$ a.out
70.9
70.905684341886080801486968994140625
and does
6 matches
Mail list logo
