Re: bug in bash completion?

2005-09-20 Thread Mike Miller
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Scott Evans wrote: I just did a big Cygwin upgrade, which included a jump to bash 3.00.16(11) from 2.x. Completion now seems a bit broken: [tmp] $ ls a.(press TAB) a.ela.html a.txt [tmp] $ ls a.. (extra period shown but not really there) My PS1

Re: bug in bash completion?

2005-09-20 Thread Brian Dessent
Scott Evans wrote: > [tmp] $ ls a.(press TAB) > a.ela.html a.txt > [tmp] $ ls a.. (extra period shown but not really there) This has been reported and discussed numerous times. It is a bug in readline somewhere, but no one has been able to definitively track it down ye

bug in bash completion?

2005-09-20 Thread Scott Evans
I just did a big Cygwin upgrade, which included a jump to bash 3.00.16(11) from 2.x. Completion now seems a bit broken: [tmp] $ ls a.(press TAB) a.ela.html a.txt [tmp] $ ls a.. (extra period shown but not really there) My PS1 is set thusly: PS1="\[\e]2;\H (\u) \w\a\]

Re: SA_SIGINFO seems to be ignored

2005-09-20 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 05:03:08PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: >signal.h defines SA_SIGINFO, but it doesn't seem to work; in the following >testcase, hiphup gets info passed as NULL. Right. It's not implemented. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Pr

SA_SIGINFO seems to be ignored

2005-09-20 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
signal.h defines SA_SIGINFO, but it doesn't seem to work; in the following testcase, hiphup gets info passed as NULL. #include #include void hiphup(int signo, siginfo_t *info, void *context) { if (info == NULL) { printf("info NULL!\n"); return; } printf("got signal\nsigno: %d, info->si_sign

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: perl-libwin32-0.26-1

2005-09-20 Thread Brian Dessent
Angelo Graziosi wrote: > It seems that the new release is in [prev], while the previous in > '[curr]'. http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2005-09/msg00402.html -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation:

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: perl-libwin32-0.26-1

2005-09-20 Thread Angelo Graziosi
Perhaps there is an error in setup.ini 20050920 17:00: @ perl-libwin32 .. install: release/perl/perl-libwin32/perl-libwin32-0.191-4.tar.bz2 1179120 0d34ca5470a62cc190786bde5e238ab1 source: release/perl/perl-libwin32/perl-libwin32

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bzr 0.0.8 -- Next-generation distributed GNU Arch compatible version control.

2005-09-20 Thread Jari Aalto
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION === Home page: http://freshmeat.net/projects/bzr/ License : GPL Next-generation distributed GNU Arch compatible version control. Distributed version control system that is powerful, friendly, and scalable implemented in Python. - Just one .bzr directory at

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: perl-libwin32-0.26-1

2005-09-20 Thread Reini Urban
This email is to inform you about the release of the updated perl-libwin32 package for the current perl-5.8.8 through http://cygwin.com/setup.exe. The changes in this release are as follows: * all patches accepted upstream. It matches the CPAN release besides the two issues below: * added APIFi

Message could not be delivered

2005-09-20 Thread wireless
Your message was not delivered due to the following reason(s): Your message could not be delivered because the destination server was unreachable within the allowed queue period. The amount of time a message is queued before it is returned depends on local configura- tion parameters. Most likely

A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

2005-09-20 Thread William Deegan
Greetings, I pulled the 0919, and 0920 snapshots and both don't run .bat files correctly. With the 0901 snapshot and with 1.5.18-1, when I run duh.bat (which contains the following and is attached), I see: REM AHA echo "AHAHAHA" With either the 0919, 0920 snapshot I see the following: duh.bat:

RE: MKPASSWD on multi-domain systems

2005-09-20 Thread James.Bassett
>On Sep 20 09:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Greetings >> I have been searching the mailing lists and googeling every thing in >> site but have not found exactly what I need. I saw in one post where >> mkpasswd had trouble when the PC was a member of one domain and the >> users logged into an

Re: expect script exits ..yet ssh.exe never exits;fixed now in snapshot..

2005-09-20 Thread Tom Rodman
This problem is gone w/recent snapshots (I'm using the 9/19 snapshot). -- thanks, Tom On Sat 8/13/05 15:37 CDT Tom Rodman wrote: > Greetings: > > Our expect script, starts an ssh session on the localhost (w/password > authentication; login shell is bash), then starts another script. The > benefi

RE: strange behavior of bash

2005-09-20 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message >From: faif cn >Sent: 20 September 2005 17:26 > Hello all, > > I deleted some values in Windows Local Environment variable "PATH". > My original "HOME" is c:/home/myname/. And then: it broke. So put them back! If that doesn't fix it, -> http://cygwin.com/prob

strange behavior of bash

2005-09-20 Thread faif cn
Hello all, I deleted some values in Windows Local Environment variable "PATH". My original "HOME" is c:/home/myname/. And then: In DOS promote: If I type "bash" in any other directories, the bash promote can be shown successfully and I can use bash environment. If I type "bash" in my ho

Re: bash not running bash_profile or bashrc

2005-09-20 Thread Tom Rodman
Dave/all: mkpasswd does fail in our "huge" :-> domain. In the example I posted, I did not kill mkpasswd, it returned 1, and the message "mkpasswd (249): [5] Access is denied.". Here's the example again: ~ $ time mkpasswd -d |wc -l ; echo mkpasswd returned: ${PIPESTATUS[0]} #let it run, did

Re: win32::api on cygwin

2005-09-20 Thread Reini Urban
Jason Pearce schrieb: Sorry if you posted this to the list and I didn't reply. I have had very little time to keep up with the Cygwin list lately. I have uploaded Reini's version of Win32::API to a http server. http://www.btinternet.com/~jasebob.pearce/cygwin/Win32-API-0.42.tar.gz There is als

Re: MKPASSWD on multi-domain systems

2005-09-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sep 20 09:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Greetings > I have been searching the mailing lists and googeling every thing in > site but have not found exactly what I need. I saw in one post where > mkpasswd had trouble when the PC was a member of one domain and the > users logged into another. T

MKPASSWD on multi-domain systems

2005-09-20 Thread James.Bassett
Greetings I have been searching the mailing lists and googeling every thing in site but have not found exactly what I need. I saw in one post where mkpasswd had trouble when the PC was a member of one domain and the users logged into another. This is the same problem we are having. I verified t

RE: bash not running bash_profile or bashrc

2005-09-20 Thread Dave Korn
Original Message >From: Tom Rodman >Sent: 20 September 2005 14:51 > On Mon 9/19/05 21:21 EDT Poor Yorick wrote: > >> mkpasswd -d > /etc/passwd >> >> seems to hang. I get no output and it never completes. I don't suppose you've actually allowed it to run forever yet, so "never" comple

Re: bash not running bash_profile or bashrc

2005-09-20 Thread Tom Rodman
On Mon 9/19/05 21:21 EDT Poor Yorick wrote: > mkpasswd -d > /etc/passwd > > seems to hang. I get no output and it never completes. For us, "mkpasswd -d" dumps ~1500-2000 users and then errs out. Our domain is hugh. My work around is to build /etc/passwd with a script that repeatedly calls "

Re: cygwin on Vista 64-bit

2005-09-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sep 20 05:33, Tim Prince wrote: > Lapo Luchini wrote: > > >Tim Prince wrote: > > > >>I am aware of that policy, that no fix will be made to support such > >>software. Just thought there might be a work-around. If not, I will > >>consider Vista broken. > > > > > >FWIW, it seems to run fine on

Re: cygwin on Vista 64-bit

2005-09-20 Thread Tim Prince
Lapo Luchini wrote: Tim Prince wrote: >I am aware of that policy, that no fix will be made to support such >software. Just thought there might be a work-around. If not, I will >consider Vista broken. FWIW, it seems to run fine on WinXP x64. (in fact, I used it for a month now) Yes, conside

Re: bash not running bash_profile or bashrc

2005-09-20 Thread Poor Yorick
Eric Blake wrote: gets fired up with startxwin.bat correctly runs .bash_profile. However, if I start another xterm from that xterm, neither .bash_profile nor .bash_rc is run. PS1 gets reset to "$". The second xterm also loses tab-completion functionality. I do, however, in the second xterm

Re: A new day, a new snapshot, more testing required on the road to 1.5.19

2005-09-20 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:32:17PM -0700, David Rothenberger wrote: >On 9/19/2005 1:28 PM, David Rothenberger wrote: >>I've attached a sample Windows program that just invokes Sleep() as >>well as a driver script. Compile the Windows program with: > >The driver script didn't come through for some r

RE: stripping snapshots

2005-09-20 Thread Dave Korn
>>> Could snapshots be provided this way instead or in addition to with >>> unstripped executables? >> >> But wouldn't that remove any debugging info? >> (which is kinda needed, if a snapshot has got some bugs) >> > > > And besides, it

RE: stripping snapshots

2005-09-20 Thread Dave Korn
; > But wouldn't that remove any debugging info? > (which is kinda needed, if a snapshot has got some bugs) > And besides, it's _really_ easy to strip them yourself: tar -tjf cygwin-inst-20050920.tar.bz2 | grep \.exe | xargs strip cheers, DaveK -- Can't

Re: stripping snapshots

2005-09-20 Thread Lapo Luchini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > Could snapshots be provided this way instead or in addition to with > unstripped executables? But wouldn't that remove any debugging info? (which is kinda needed, if a snapshot has got some bugs) - -- L a p o L u c

Re: cygwin on Vista 64-bit

2005-09-20 Thread Lapo Luchini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Prince wrote: > I am aware of that policy, that no fix will be made to support such > software. Just thought there might be a work-around. If not, I will > consider Vista broken. FWIW, it seems to run fine on WinXP x64. (in fact, I used it for a