On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 08:15:42PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Rex Eastbourne wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > If I already have a program, such as Emacs, that comes with Cygwin,
> > should I keep my own version, or get the Cygwin version? (The shell
> > doesn't recognize the 'em
According to
http://www.fr.linuxfromscratch.org/view/blfs-cvs/postlfs/inputrc.html,
comments can not be on the same line as commands in .inputrc. I have
corrected this in my .inputrc and everything work great now.
Thanks for your help
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Daniel Landry wrote:
>Running bind a
The below patch to rebaseall will avoid errors when rebasing dlls used
by the shell which is executing it.
It might be interesting to automatically write a .bat file which
performed the final step of renaming the rebased in-use dlls to their
correct names but it's too late to do that.
cgf
--- /b
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 12:09:11AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>It's a readshortcut double free problem. As mentioned in another
>>message, cygwin is using a new version of malloc and it appears to be
>>more sensitive to these programming errors.
>>
>>The patch below f
Christopher Faylor wrote:
It's a readshortcut double free problem. As mentioned in another
message, cygwin is using a new version of malloc and it appears to be
more sensitive to these programming errors.
The patch below fixes it.
Chuck, ok to check in? If so, I'll also get rid of all of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Lev Bishop on 7/7/2005 9:50 PM:
>>bash$ echo `echo '${'`
>>
>
> Actually, this is a bad example, because even if bash did parse
> correctly, there would be still an incomplete ${ substitution for the
> outer echo
No, because by POSIX XCU
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Lev Bishop wrote:
> On 07/07/05, Eric Blake wrote:
>
> > zsh$ bash
> > bash$ echo `echo '${'`
> > >
> > # Hmm - I was just incorrectly presented PS2, asking to try to continue
> > what bash thought was an incomplete ${ variable substitution
>
> Actually, this is a bad example,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jon A. Lambert on 7/7/2005 4:24 PM:
> I solved the problem.
> My orignal cygwin.bat file contained:
> SET HOME=c:\cygwin\home
> My profile conatined:
> set HOME=\home\$USER
>
> This used to work just fine in bash-2. Doesn't work in bash
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 08:24:20PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>According to Christopher Faylor on 7/7/2005 8:05 PM:
>>>Option B would be to write a C or C++ program to do the job of what
>>>rebaseall currently does. That's even more work.
>>
>> I was going to suggest that but it requires that the u
On 07/07/05, Eric Blake wrote:
> zsh$ bash
> bash$ echo `echo '${'`
> >
> # Hmm - I was just incorrectly presented PS2, asking to try to continue
> what bash thought was an incomplete ${ variable substitution
Actually, this is a bad example, because even if bash did parse
correctly, there would b
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:21:29PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 06:41:31PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
>>
>> >Option B would be to write a C or C++ program to do the job of what
>> >rebaseall currently does. That's even
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:27:15AM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
> I said "virus program". That would be something like
> Norton AV, McAfee VirusScan, etc.
Hmm, is there any way cygcheck could report on intrusive software like
virus scanners and firewalls? Though my knowlege on the subject is
close t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Igor Pechtchanski on 7/7/2005 6:34 PM:
> Yep. The new /bin/sh is bash. Apparently, bash doesn't like the
> following line:
>
> if [ "`echo $dllname | sed 's{^lib/.*\.dll${{'`" != "$dllname" ]; then
>
> because in bash, ${ has special m
Eric Blake wrote:
> Except that even the /bin/sh postinstalls often did mv, cp, or some other
> action involving one of the coreutils. It's hard to do much of anything
> without using the coreutils, which have depended on iconv and intl since
> their 5.2.1 days.
You're right. As I said, I hadn'
Thank you both for the information and clarification on Cygwin. I
guess I will download the Windows version of J2EE instead..
CJ
On 7/7/05, Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> According to C Jennings on 7/7/2005 8:03 PM:
> > Hello,
> > Th
From: "Peter A. Castro"
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 16:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
::On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Spack wrote:
::
::> I've tried to change the default shell (bash) to zsh by changing the
::> appropriated line in the /etc/passwd file but when I reload cygwin I'm
::> always on bash. How can I change the defa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Brian Dessent on 7/7/2005 8:21 PM:
>>coreutils already requires libintl and libiconv since 5.2.1 days, so most
>>useful actions in a postinstall script have already depended on having
>>libraries available as part of Base. Based on severa
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>This would seem to indicate that the .inputrc either isn't read, or is
>overridden.
>Try running 'bind "set input-meta on"; bind "set output-meta on"', and
>then see if that lets you input French characters. If it does,
>investigate why your .inputr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to C Jennings on 7/7/2005 8:03 PM:
> Hello,
> This might be a stupid question but is it possible to install Linux
> software onto Cygwin.
Cygwin is (well, strives to be) a SOURCE-compatible environment. To run a
linux program in cygwin, th
C Jennings wrote:
> This might be a stupid question but is it possible to install Linux
> software onto Cygwin.
No.
> I currently have Cygwin + 3.1.4 KDE installed on my Windows XP box.
> I've downloaded (wget) a tar file of the Java J2EE SDK v1.3.1 and
> installed it using the following command
Eric Blake wrote:
> Or, you could make rebaseall a #!/bin/ash script, which would require that
> we never kill ash from the distribution, while freeing you from bash's
> dynamic linking.
Ah, hadn't thought of that. This seems like the best short-term
solution, since it involves minimal changes.
Eric Blake wrote:
> coreutils already requires libintl and libiconv since 5.2.1 days, so most
> useful actions in a postinstall script have already depended on having
> libraries available as part of Base. Based on several months of no
> complaints, I think we can discount the theoretical problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Christopher Faylor on 7/7/2005 8:05 PM:
>>Option B would be to write a C or C++ program to do the job of what
>>rebaseall currently does. That's even more work.
>
> I was going to suggest that but it requires that the user had loaded
> t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: i686
OS: cygwin
Compiler: gcc
Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash.exe' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='i686'
- -DCONF_OSTYPE='cygwin' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='i686-pc-cygwin' -DCONF_VENDOR='pc'
- -
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 06:41:31PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
>
> >Option B would be to write a C or C++ program to do the job of what
> >rebaseall currently does. That's even more work.
>
> I was going to suggest that but it requires that the user
Why?, install the native JVM, then your j2ee jars.
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, C Jennings wrote:
Hello,
This might be a stupid question but is it possible to install Linux
software onto Cygwin.
I currently have Cygwin + 3.1.4 KDE installed on my Windows XP box.
I've downloaded (wget) a tar file of
Ugh, top-posting. Reformatted.
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Daniel Landry wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>
> >At which point this stops being an X-related problem, and is better
> >discussed on the main list. I've set the Reply-To: accordingly (though
> >the xfree list is likely t
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 06:41:31PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>I think we will require a statically linked bash, or some kind of
>>>trickery in the rebaseall script. One potential way around this might
>>>be for it to output a .cmd file (or .bat under 9x, grrr) and th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Brian Dessent on 7/7/2005 7:41 PM:
>
> Option B would be to write a C or C++ program to do the job of what
> rebaseall currently does. That's even more work.
True - there are many actions where scripts are just more convenient than
full
Hello,
This might be a stupid question but is it possible to install Linux
software onto Cygwin.
I currently have Cygwin + 3.1.4 KDE installed on my Windows XP box.
I've downloaded (wget) a tar file of the Java J2EE SDK v1.3.1 and
installed it using the following command provided on Sun's website
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Igor Pechtchanski on 7/7/2005 6:34 PM:
> I suspect this may actually be a bug in bash, since single
> quotes ought to stop it from trying to expand variable references. This
> only happens when the single quotes are inside a shell substit
Could we split the "Why is your package so out of date?" question out of
the "Why isn't package available in Cygwin?" and add something like
the below?
cgf
Q) Why is your package XYZ so out of date?
Q) Why is the version of package XYZ older than the version that
I can download from the XYZ
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >I think we will require a statically linked bash, or some kind of
> >trickery in the rebaseall script. One potential way around this might
> >be for it to output a .cmd file (or .bat under 9x, grrr) and then exec()
> >$COMSPEC to run the commands. This would have the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Brian Dessent on 7/7/2005 7:15 PM:
> This is a problem with the new bash version 3.0, which is dynamically
> linked to the readline, libiconv, and ncurses DLLs:
>
> The prior version of bash, 2.05b-17, is statically linked:
The problem i
Herman Poon wrote:
> I'm wondering why the release of rsync that is in the current Cygwin
> setup is only 2.6.3, when 2.6.4 was released on March 30, 2005 and
> 2.6.5 was released on June 1, 2005. Rsync is even at 2.6.6pre1 now (I
> got the announcement today via rsync-announce).
>
> I'm not "com
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 06:15:36PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
>I think we will require a statically linked bash, or some kind of
>trickery in the rebaseall script. One potential way around this might
>be for it to output a .cmd file (or .bat under 9x, grrr) and then exec()
>$COMSPEC to run the co
In Xterm, running bash, the result is:
$ echo \351
e (e acute is displayed correctly)
$ bind -v | grep meta
set convert-meta off
set input-meta off
set meta-flag off
set output-meta off
My complete .bashrc is (I have removed only the line beginning by #):
# User dependent .bashrc
"Adye, TJ (Tim)" wrote:
> % rebaseall
> ReBaseImage (/usr/bin/cygiconv-2.dll) failed with last error = 6
>
> cygiconv-2.dll is used by bash, but rebaseall is a bash script. What can
> I do?
This is a problem with the new bash version 3.0, which is dynamically
linked to the readline, libiconv, an
Hello,
My apologies if this is a dumb question. I did look in both the cygwin
and cygwin-apps mailing list archives for this information, and also
tried Googling for it but could not find an answer.
I'm wondering why the release of rsync that is in the current Cygwin
setup is only 2.6.3, when 2.6
"Gerrit P. Haase" wrote:
> However, I see the same problem as I had with my own Apache2 in January,
> I'm getting only 8k and then it stops transmission...
> ...
> What the heck is going on here?
Try adding 'EnableSendfile Off' to httpd.conf to see if it makes a
difference.
Brian
--
Unsubscribe
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> Last morning I have made a build of ROOT (a CERN application) using the
> snapshot 20050705, bash-3.0-3-test, ash-20040127-1, coreutils-5.3.0-6
> GCC-3.3.3-3. The buid takes almost 1.5 h
>
> After upgrading to bash-3.0-7, ash-20040127-3, coreutils-5.3.0
Thanks for your response...
> Ok, so what are you expecting to find in /etc/shells and how does that
> relate to you running your shell of choice?
This file lists all available shells, no ?
And I indeed start cygwin from the icon. I'll test mkzsh...
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml
At 04:56 PM 7/7/2005, you wrote:
>Mikael wrote:
>>I love cygwin and the tools ported to it. I wish I was a more knowledgeable
>>person so I could contribute to the project and just not praise it.
>
>I started with zero knowledge about Cygwin and zero knowledge about
>programming five years back.
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Rex Eastbourne wrote:
> Hi all,
> If I already have a program, such as Emacs, that comes with Cygwin,
> should I keep my own version, or get the Cygwin version? (The shell
> doesn't recognize the 'emacs' command, but I presume I can fix that by
> changing my $PATH). Are there a
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out why the libtiff library in the cygwin
distribution is so old (v3.7.0beta2-1 vs the current release 3.7.3).
Does it need to be put into cygwin by a libtiff developer or does
someone in this group handle installing the updates?
I'm not one of the core developers on
At 02:54 PM 7/7/2005, you wrote:
>Hi Larry,
>
>Sorry, I assumed that the rebasing problem was ancient history, since I
>hadn't encountered it for so long (and remembered a long-ago comment
>about rebaseall being a stop-gap measure). Thanks for putting me right.
Well, it's not entirely a stop-gap
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Rex Eastbourne wrote:
> Is it advisable to edit one's .bashrc? I'd like to put in a bunch of
> customizations, aliases, etc., but I'm intimidated by the message
> saying that my .bashrc will not be updated by setup.exe if I modify
> it. Does this mean that I'll have to put in c
Last morning I have made a build of ROOT (a CERN application) using the
snapshot 20050705, bash-3.0-3-test, ash-20040127-1, coreutils-5.3.0-6
GCC-3.3.3-3. The buid takes almost 1.5 h
After upgrading to bash-3.0-7, ash-20040127-3, coreutils-5.3.0-7 I have
tried a new build. This time the buid stop
> Is it advisable to edit one's .bashrc? I'd like to put in a bunch of
> customizations, aliases, etc., but I'm intimidated by the message
> saying that my .bashrc will not be updated by setup.exe if I modify
> it. Does this mean that I'll have to put in changes for new programs
> manually? If so,
Is it advisable to edit one's .bashrc? I'd like to put in a bunch of
customizations, aliases, etc., but I'm intimidated by the message
saying that my .bashrc will not be updated by setup.exe if I modify
it. Does this mean that I'll have to put in changes for new programs
manually? If so, how can I
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Spack wrote:
I've tried to change the default shell (bash) to zsh by changing the
appropriated line in the /etc/passwd file but when I reload cygwin I'm
always on bash. How can I change the default shell ?
The stock startup script (cygwin.bat) has bash hardcoded in it, so i
Hi all,
If I already have a program, such as Emacs, that comes with Cygwin,
should I keep my own version, or get the Cygwin version? (The shell
doesn't recognize the 'emacs' command, but I presume I can fix that by
changing my $PATH). Are there any other advantages to the Cygwin
versions?
Best,
Rex
Jon A. Lambert wrote:
Jon A. Lambert wrote:
What happened to my tilde?
It looks like it points to /home instead of /home/jlambert
How do I fix this?
I would add that if I telnet or ssh in to my cygwin shell everything
is fine and my ~/.bash_profile is invoked correctly and cd ~ does
take me t
I've tried to change the default shell (bash) to zsh by changing the
appropriated line in the /etc/passwd file but when I reload cygwin I'm
always on bash. How can I change the default shell ?
PS: I've installed zsh but I've not looking for the /etc/shells file.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://c
> I just installed bash 3.0-7 and immediately noticed my colors where gone and
> my delete key no longer worked.
>
> Anyways I'm a bit clueless but it seems something wierd is happening to ~
> I can verify my profile is executed and my .bash_profile and .bashrc are
> not.
Well, if your .bash_pr
Daniel,
Please make sure your mailer respects the Reply-To: header -- I set it for
a reason. There was no need to Cc: me -- I read the list.
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Daniel Landry wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >Ah. I'm going to venture a guess and say that it's not simply
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:03:01PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>
>>>Wouldn't this problem be ameliorated slightly if the perl DLLs all
>>>loaded in unique addresses to begin with? Isn't the problem that all
>>>perl DLLs (and probably others) are loading in address 0x1
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:45:14PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>>On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 02:08:40PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
>>
>>>At 01:10 PM 7/7/2005, you wrote:
>>>
In an attempt to work round the problem with readshortcut I reported
earlier, I thought I'd
> I updated my Cygwin installation this morning and picked up the new
> version of Bash (3.0-7). When I started a new shell (running under
> rxvt) I was suprised to see that my prompt displayed differently than
> before the upgrade. I use the following prompt
>
> PS1='\[\e]0;[EMAIL PROTECTED
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Wouldn't this problem be ameliorated slightly if the perl DLLs all
loaded in unique addresses to begin with? Isn't the problem that all
perl DLLs (and probably others) are loading in address 0x1000?
Gerrit, would you be willing to change this so that the DLLs load in
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
However, I see the same problem as I had with my own Apache2 in January,
I'm getting only 8k and then it stops transmission...
$ wget http://anfaenger.de/xmailgraph/pop3_daily.png
--22:22:04-- http://anfaenger.de/xmailgraph/pop3_daily.png
=> `pop3_daily.png'
Re
Mikael wrote:
So, I updated my cygwin installation today (something I hadn't done for a
few weeks or so) to get the latest version of cygwin itself, but I was also
interested in the new version of bash.
During the updating process some other programs were updated since new
(stable) versions we
> I updated my Cygwin installation this morning and picked up the new
> version of Bash (3.0-7). When I started a new shell (running under
> rxvt) I was suprised to see that my prompt displayed differently than
> before the upgrade. I use the following prompt
>
> PS1='\[\e]0;[EMAIL PROTECTED
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 02:08:40PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
At 01:10 PM 7/7/2005, you wrote:
In an attempt to work round the problem with readshortcut I reported
earlier, I thought I'd use a Perl script. Unfortunately the
Win32::Shortcut package seems to cause probl
Max,
I use my self compiled apr / apu, will reiinstall the distributed
version now. Hope that will help.
This makes a difference. It is running now. Sorry for the false alarm.
However, I see the same problem as I had with my own Apache2 in January,
I'm getting only 8k and then it stops tra
Jon A. Lambert wrote:
What happened to my tilde?
It looks like it points to /home instead of /home/jlambert
How do I fix this?
I would add that if I telnet or ssh in to my cygwin shell everything is fine
and my ~/.bash_profile is invoked correctly and cd ~ does take me to the
right user dire
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Max Bowsher wrote:
Apache httpd version 2.0, the popular web server, is now packaged for
the Cygwin distribution, and arriving soon to a mirror near you.
Getting this error:
[Thu Jul 07 21:43:44 2005] [crit] (22)Invalid argument: mod_rewrite:
could not create rewrit
So, I updated my cygwin installation today (something I hadn't done for a
few weeks or so) to get the latest version of cygwin itself, but I was also
interested in the new version of bash.
During the updating process some other programs were updated since new
(stable) versions were availabe and
Max Bowsher wrote:
Apache httpd version 2.0, the popular web server, is now packaged for
the Cygwin distribution, and arriving soon to a mirror near you.
Getting this error:
[Thu Jul 07 21:43:44 2005] [crit] (22)Invalid argument: mod_rewrite:
could not create rewrite_log_lock
Configuration
Answering my own question
> cygiconv-2.dll is used by bash, but rebaseall is a bash script.
> What can I do?
I found I could do this by saving the rebase command-line and file list
that rebaseall generates and then running the rebase command directly
from the DOS prompt. Now Perl's Win32::Shortcu
Hi Larry,
Sorry, I assumed that the rebasing problem was ancient history, since I
hadn't encountered it for so long (and remembered a long-ago comment
about rebaseall being a stop-gap measure). Thanks for putting me right.
Unfortunately I can't get rebaseall to work... running from a bash
prompt
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 01:31:27PM -0500, reader wrote:
> My aim is to retrieve from a pop3 server using fetchmail and deliver
> using procmail to wherever it needs to go for gnus to slurp the mail.
You should find the necessary information to do the above in the
following:
/usr/share/doc/Cyg
Eric Blake wrote:
A new release of bash, 3.0-7, is available, replacing 2.05b-17.
I just installed bash 3.0-7 and immediately noticed my colors where gone and
my delete key no longer worked.
Anyways I'm a bit clueless but it seems something wierd is happening to ~
I can verify my profile i
I updated my Cygwin installation this morning and picked up the new
version of Bash (3.0-7). When I started a new shell (running under
rxvt) I was suprised to see that my prompt displayed differently than
before the upgrade. I use the following prompt
PS1='\[\e]0;[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PRO
I've found quite a lot of info about fetchmail and procmail on google
but didn't really find something describing how to make them work with
winxp native mail tools. (My reader is not native winxp but Emacs news
reader Gnus).
I'm well acquainted with setting both up under a sendmail system but
rea
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 02:08:40PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
>At 01:10 PM 7/7/2005, you wrote:
>>In an attempt to work round the problem with readshortcut I reported
>>earlier, I thought I'd use a Perl script. Unfortunately the
>>Win32::Shortcut package seems to cause problems with process forking
>
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Btw, in case anyone is interested, I tracked this down by putting a
> breakpoint on free, and printing the address being freed. Then I
> cut/pasted that output to a file and sorted the file based on the
> address. This unearthed a few potential candidates for this pro
Larry Hall wrote:
>
> At 02:17 AM 7/7/2005, you wrote:
>
>
>
> >ohaya wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've been trying to configure Cygwin NFS running on a Windows 2003
> >> Server machine (machine: testwin2k3) to export directories so that I can
> >> eventually use these directories as home d
At 01:10 PM 7/7/2005, you wrote:
>In an attempt to work round the problem with readshortcut I reported
>earlier, I thought I'd use a Perl script. Unfortunately the
>Win32::Shortcut package seems to cause problems with process forking
>(unlike the readshortcut error, this one isn't specific to the l
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 05:29:25PM +0100, Adye, TJ (Tim) wrote:
>Hi,
>
>With cygwin-1.5.18-1, the |readshortcut| command crashes on exit if I
>specify a Cygwin-style path name. The crash goes away if I downgrade to
>cygwin 1.5.17-1.
It's a readshortcut double free problem. As mentioned in another
At 02:17 AM 7/7/2005, you wrote:
>ohaya wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been trying to configure Cygwin NFS running on a Windows 2003
>> Server machine (machine: testwin2k3) to export directories so that I can
>> eventually use these directories as home directories on Solaris
>> machines.
>>
>>
Hi,
In an attempt to work round the problem with readshortcut I reported
earlier, I thought I'd use a Perl script. Unfortunately the
Win32::Shortcut package seems to cause problems with process forking
(unlike the readshortcut error, this one isn't specific to the latest
cygwin DLL). I get an erro
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 06:37:08PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>On Jul 7 14:26, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>>>Eric Blake wrote:
An alternative is to investigate using the gnulib module in your code.
gnulib is currently designed for CVS use only (so there is no cygwi
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 7 14:26, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Eric Blake wrote:
An alternative is to investigate using the gnulib module in your code.
gnulib is currently designed for CVS use only (so there is no cygwin
distribution), but projects like coreutils use gnulib getline() and ot
Hi,
With cygwin-1.5.18-1, the |readshortcut| command crashes on exit if I
specify a Cygwin-style path name. The crash goes away if I downgrade to
cygwin 1.5.17-1.
% readshortcut "C:/Documents and Settings/All Users/Start
Menu/Programs/Accessories/Calculator"
/cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/system32/calc.exe
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 09:42:39PM -0400, Maloney, Michael wrote:
>I am having a problem using cygwin on both Windows 2k/2003. When I send
>a cmd into the background and then log out of the system, the process
>dies on me. I am using Ataman Telnet Server to login but that doesn't
>seem to be a fact
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, FischRon.external wrote:
> > > ~ $ getfacl /usr /usr/share /usr/share/misc
> > > # file: /usr
> > > # owner: Administrators
> > > # group: mkpasswd
> > ^^^
> > > user::rwx
> > > group::---
> > ^^
> > > group:SYSTEM:rwx
> > > mask:rwx
> > > other:---
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A new release of bash, 3.0-7, is available, replacing 2.05b-17.
CAUTION:
A bug in the postinstall script of ash-20040127-2 and bash-3.0-6 lets
you end up with no /bin/sh.exe at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A new release of coreutils, 5.3.0-7, is available.
NEWS
This is a minor patch release. The overall 5.3.0 series was designated
unstable by the upstream author (compared to the stable 5.2.1), because it
introduces some POSIX-compliance fixes for
> Wait for 20040127-3 and bash-3.0-7 to show up on the mirror and install
> these.
Did you really mean bash-3.0-7? I only see an announcement for
bash-3.0-6.
--
Ken Shaffer
- - - - - - - Appended by Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. - - - - - - -
This e-mail and any attachments may contain
* Corinna Vinschen (2005-07-07 13:45 +0100)
> On Jul 7 13:35, fergus wrote:
>> Just updated bash and ash, seems to involve losing /bin/sh.exe.
>>
>> (1) Now all scripts beginning #! /bin/sh fail; should there be a link
>> /bin/sh -> /bin/bash?
>
> No, the postinstall scripts of both, bash and as
> > ~ $ getfacl /usr /usr/share /usr/share/misc
> > # file: /usr
> > # owner: Administrators
> > # group: mkpasswd
> ^^^
> > user::rwx
> > group::---
> ^^
> > group:SYSTEM:rwx
> > mask:rwx
> > other:---
> > default:user:Administrators:rwx
> > default:group:SYSTEM:rwx
> > d
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, FischRon.external wrote:
> > Please make sure your mailer respects the Reply-To: header -- I set it
> > for a reason. There's no need to Cc: me on the messages, as I read
> > the list.
>
> Thank you for pointing this out! It's done correct now.
Yes it is. Thank you for notic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to fergus on 7/7/2005 7:17 AM:
> (2) There is no /bin/sh.exe.
As a temporary workaround for those who have already downloaded the BROKEN
ash-20050707-2 and bash-3.0-6, use Windows Explorer to copy
c:\cygwin\bin\bash.exe to c:\cygwin\
Thanks for getting back so quickly.
Sorry about annoying typo in Subject.
(1) and (2) answer your qq. Please see also (3).
(1) I installed using setup, selecting everything (including source). I
always update using setup.
(2) There is no /bin/sh.exe.
cat /var/log/setup.log reveals postinstall sc
I've updated the version of ash to 20040127-3.
CAUTION:
A bug in the postinstall script of ash-20040127-2 and bash-3.0-6 lets
you end up with no /bin/sh.exe at all. Do not install these versions
if your mirror of choice onl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Gerrit P. Haase on 7/7/2005 6:35 AM:
>>> An alternative is to investigate using the gnulib module in your code.
>
> Wouldn't it be nice to have it as a Cygwin package?
Unfortunately, the gnulib maintainers aren't ready for it to be a pac
On Jul 7 14:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 7 13:35, fergus wrote:
> > Just updated bash and ash, seems to involve losing /bin/sh.exe.
> >
> > (1) Now all scripts beginning #! /bin/sh fail; should there be a link
> > /bin/sh -> /bin/bash?
>
> No, the postinstall scripts of both, bash and a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Gerrit P. Haase on 7/7/2005 6:26 AM:
>>http://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/
>
> Same approach as libgen? Are dirname() and basename() included?
Gnulib uses source code sharing. There is no libgnulib.a, just a lot of
small modules that ca
On Jul 7 13:35, fergus wrote:
> Just updated bash and ash, seems to involve losing /bin/sh.exe.
>
> (1) Now all scripts beginning #! /bin/sh fail; should there be a link
> /bin/sh -> /bin/bash?
No, the postinstall scripts of both, bash and ash are copying bash.exe
to sh.exe. How did you install
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
