Re: Building Perl modules

2005-02-11 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Alejandro Calbazana wrote: Attached is my output of cygcheck -s -r -v. I see nothing unusual besides the LIB environment setting which causes problems with perl frequently. Remove this from the cygwin environment: LIB = `c:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2003\SDK\v1.1\Lib\' $ unset LIB

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: zsh-4.2.4-1

2005-02-11 Thread zzapper
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:35:19 +0100 (CET), wrote: >An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.2.4-1) has been released and should be >at a mirror near you real soon. > Peter On my Pc echo $ZSH_VERSION always revealed 4.2.0 Then I remembered I'd had this b4, I then used W-Explorer to copy /usr/bin/zsh-4.2

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: zsh-4.2.4-1

2005-02-11 Thread zzapper
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:35:19 +0100 (CET), wrote: >An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.2.4-1) has been released and should be >at a mirror near you real soon. > Peter On my Pc echo $ZSH_VERSION always revealed 4.2.0 Then I remembered I'd had this b4, I then used W-Explorer to copy /usr/bin/zsh-4.2

Re: scponly for chrooted sftp server in cygwin

2005-02-11 Thread Christian Weinberger
> I still get the following error during the make phase. > > gcc -g -O2 -I. -I. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H > -DDEBUGFILE='"/usr/local/etc/scponly/debuglev > el"' -o helper.o -c helper.c > helper.c:174: warning: passing arg 1 of `strdup' makes pointer from > integer with > out a cast >

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: zsh-4.2.4-1

2005-02-11 Thread zzapper
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:35:19 +0100 (CET), wrote: >An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.2.4-1) has been released and should be >at a mirror near you real soon. > Peter (I don't seem to be able to post today) On my Pc echo $ZSH_VERSION always revealed 4.2.0 Then I remembered I'd had this b4, I then u

cygheap version mismatch detected

2005-02-11 Thread CV
I seem to have managed to completely crash my cygwin installation :o( After trying some of the recent snapshots I noticed KDE would not start. So I tried with different snapshots (including the original cygwin1.dll) a few times, rebooting and running rebaseall -v between tries. Now neither KDE

Re: Cannot download package "CVS" - bzip2 archive is broken

2005-02-11 Thread Brian Dessent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I cannot download the package "CVS". The archives are broken, > independent of the download site. > There weren't any problems with other packages. > A manual FTP download of the archives shows the same: Archives are > broken since december. > Has no one else encountered

RE: rsh command gives: "rlogin: read: Operation not permitted"

2005-02-11 Thread Larry Hall
At 04:29 AM 2/11/2005, you wrote: > >>CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.5(0.94/3/2) (g1gpv0j) (tty0) > > ^^ >This says you're using using Cygwin DLL version 1.5.5. The current version >is 1.5.12. Please upgrade and try again. > >This is the login prompt of my laptop I try to connect to and not

Cannot download package "CVS" - bzip2 archive is broken

2005-02-11 Thread 6281a02
I cannot download the package "CVS". The archives are broken, independent of the download site. There weren't any problems with other packages. A manual FTP download of the archives shows the same: Archives are broken since december. Has no one else encountered this problem? -- Unsubscribe info:

Re: AT&T ksh93

2005-02-11 Thread Glenn Fowler
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:21:07 +0100 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Feb 9 16:25, Glenn Fowler wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 19:01:58 +0100 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > I don't understand your problem with being Cygwin maintainer for this > > > package if you patch and build it anyway. The maintenan

Re: An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.2.4-1)

2005-02-11 Thread Peter A. Castro
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, David Rayner wrote: > Peter Hi David, (I've cc: the list as this is relevent). > An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.2.4-1) has been released and should be > >at a mirror near you real soon. > > > Peter (I don't seem to be able to post today) > > On my Pc > echo $ZSH_VERSION

Re: setup.exe timestamp 1108087248: mined-2000.10-1: minor glitch

2005-02-11 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 06:54:53PM +, fergus wrote: >> What is your *exact* problem? > >I visited the Cygwin site www.cygwin.com/setup.exe (as one does) and >trawled for updates. This was about 12 hours ago. There were none, >apparently. But I observed that setup.ini stamped ..7248 (just as it

Re: setup.exe timestamp 1108087248: mined-2000.10-1: minor glitch

2005-02-11 Thread fergus
> What is your *exact* problem? I visited the Cygwin site www.cygwin.com/setup.exe (as one does) and trawled for updates. This was about 12 hours ago. There were none, apparently. But I observed that setup.ini stamped ..7248 (just as it is now, in fact) had altered since my previous visit, and not

Re: setup.exe timestamp 1108087248: mined-2000.10-1: minor glitch

2005-02-11 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 06:28:50AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >There is an intrusive blank line in the entry for mined-2000.10-1 in >setup.ini timestamp 1108087248, preventing its download and installation. What is your *exact* problem? If blank lines in an ldesc are causing a problem then t

Re: more ctime bugs

2005-02-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 11 07:10, Eric Blake wrote: > According to Corinna Vinschen on 2/11/2005 2:35 AM: > > No problem with open and link, but I'm a bit reluctant to do this in > > write. Setting the file time on each WriteFile looks like a pretty > > time consuming operation, so I'm a bit in doubt if every writ

RE: more ctime bugs

2005-02-11 Thread Dave Korn
> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Eric Blake > Sent: 11 February 2005 14:11 > That idea is close to what I had in mind. Note that POSIX > wording in 4.7 > for updating file times, > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/xbd_cha > p04.html: > There i

Re: more ctime bugs

2005-02-11 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Corinna Vinschen on 2/11/2005 2:35 AM: > No problem with open and link, but I'm a bit reluctant to do this in > write. Setting the file time on each WriteFile looks like a pretty > time consuming operation, so I'm a bit in doubt if every

RE: more ctime bugs

2005-02-11 Thread Dave Korn
> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen > Sent: 11 February 2005 09:35 > On Feb 9 21:27, ericblake wrote: > > Corinna, since you've been fixing so many ctime bugs lately > to match SUSv3 > > and POSIX, could you also fix open(2) when O_TRUNC is set, > and

Re: Building Perl modules

2005-02-11 Thread Alejandro Calbazana
Attached is my output of cygcheck -s -r -v. Gerrit, was there something in particular that you wanted to point out to me regarding http://cygwin.com/problems.html? Thanks, Alejandro Cygwin Configuration Diagnostics Current System Time: Fri Feb 11 08:25:18 2005 Windows 2000 Professional Ver 5.

Re: AT&T ksh93

2005-02-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Glenn, On Feb 9 16:25, Glenn Fowler wrote: > On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 19:01:58 +0100 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > I don't understand your problem with being Cygwin maintainer for this > > package if you patch and build it anyway. The maintenance effort > > besides building and packing looks pretty smal

Re: more ctime bugs

2005-02-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Eric, On Feb 9 21:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Corinna, since you've been fixing so many ctime bugs lately to match SUSv3 > and POSIX, could you also fix open(2) when O_TRUNC is set, and write(2) and > link(2) in general, to touch ctime? No problem with open and link, but I'm a bit reluctant t

RE: rsh command gives: "rlogin: read: Operation not permitted"

2005-02-11 Thread Kouteren, Adrie van
>CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.5(0.94/3/2) (g1gpv0j) (tty0) ^^ This says you're using using Cygwin DLL version 1.5.5. The current version is 1.5.12. Please upgrade and try again. This is the login prompt of my laptop I try to connect to and not the version of client PC a try to connec

More: setup.exe timestamp 1108087248: mined-2000.10-1: minor glitch

2005-02-11 Thread fergus
> There is an intrusive blank line in the entry > for mined-2000.10-1 in setup.ini timestamp 1108087248, > preventing its download and installation. No, sorry, I'm talking rubbish I think, there are other mid-entry blank lines in setup.ini. But something meant that the files mined* didn't come dow