Jani Tiainen wrote:
I'm trying to compile app that uses docbook but even I installed all
necessary packages I end up having error while running 'configure':
checking which XML catalog to use... /etc/xml/catalog
checking for DocBook XML DTD... configure: error: not found. Make sure
you have the D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jani Tiainen wrote:
| I'm trying to compile app that uses docbook but even I installed all
| necessary packages I end up having error while running 'configure':
|
| checking which XML catalog to use... /etc/xml/catalog
| checking for DocBook XML DTD...
I'm trying to compile app that uses docbook but even I installed all
necessary packages I end up having error while running 'configure':
checking which XML catalog to use... /etc/xml/catalog
checking for DocBook XML DTD... configure: error: not found. Make sure
you have the DocBook DTD installed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The following packages have been updated in the Cygwin distribution:
*** libwnck-2.8.1-1
This is an update to the newest upstream release.
Upstream NEWS:
~ - Only highlight sticky windows on the current workspace (Elijah Newren)
~ - Don't activat
Subversion, a version control system which aims to be a compelling
replacement for CVS, has been updated in the Cygwin net distribution to
version 1.1.1-1.
This is a new upstream feature release.
The release notes (*well worth reading*) are here:
http://subversion.tigris.org/svn_1.1_releasenotes.
Peter Ekberg wrote:
I have a problem with "make install" of a built executable.
I'm confused.
Background: the only reason you ever need a wrapper script for an
executable in a libtoolized project, is when that executable depends on
an uninstalled shared library. You need the wrapper script to se
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
libpthread should be in the list of libraries where these tests are
skipped, like it is for libstdc++ or libgcc and others,
Nope. MAYBE it should be skipped, like -lc and -lm are skipped. But
libstdc++ and libgcc are a different kettle of fish.
libtool specifically check
Reini Urban schrieb:
Mark Pizzolato schrieb:
...
patching file clamav-0.80/CYGWIN-PATCHES/README
patching file clamav-0.80/CYGWIN-PATCHES/postinstall.sh
patching file clamav-0.80/CYGWIN-PATCHES/preremove.sh
patching file clamav-0.80/INSTALL
patching file clamav-0.80/Makefile.in
patching file clamav
Mark Pizzolato schrieb:
I have updated the version of clamav on cygwin.com to 0.80-1.
This has now a shared version of the library and several updates.
Clam AntiVirus - GPL anti-virus toolkit
This distribution was built without the Windows UI.
You might want to use clamavwin (python wxWindows) inst
I'm having some problems with hyperthreading machines and cygwin.
AFAIK there was some kind of problem with hyperthreading on cygwin,
do anyone know if this problems has been fixed?
PD: Please answer to my address, as i'm not on the list. Thnx
--
Pablo Ruiz Garcia (Pci)
Security Consultancy - Tiger
HI, all
Greeting to all mates. This is my first time here.
I installed from a local downloaded directory. (Since I cannot access
Internet in my office), and after installed that, I found I missed vim
and w32api, these two tar.gz file were broken. So I downloaded them
individually, and copy them (
Hi Corinna,
CYGWIN should be quoted when passed to cygrunsrv,
otherwise one will not be able to use CYGWIN="server codepage:oem" as
sshd env. See the patch (but remove --interactive).
**
And then I have this service --interactive question:
My favorite term is putty which allows compared t
At 01:10 AM 10/26/2004, you wrote:
>"Larry Hall" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[snip]
>> So you mean that when you ran 'setup.exe' and got to the page titled
>> "Cygwin Setup - Choose Installation Directory", your "Root Directory"
>> read as 'C:\Cygwin\bin' and you did not change that t
I have updated the version of clamav on cygwin.com to 0.80-1.
This has now a shared version of the library and several updates.
Clam AntiVirus - GPL anti-virus toolkit
This distribution was built without the Windows UI.
You might want to use clamavwin (python wxWindows) instead.
See /usr/share/doc/
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 11:45:06PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
>Max Bowsher schrieb:
>>Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>>>Reini Urban wrote:
Gerrit,
Shouldn't your next perl update also include our own perl libs?
>>>These are the libs required by upset?
>>
>>Indeed.
>>
>>Reini, why would you think the
Once again, there's "Nothing Quite Like Geeks Going Over-Board"...
Can we ignore, kill, or TITTTL this thread?
[ Mandatory flapping of arms and squawking like a chicken removed by
Kulack ]
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com
Max Bowsher schrieb:
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Reini Urban wrote:
Gerrit,
Shouldn't your next perl update also include our own perl libs?
These are the libs required by upset?
Indeed.
Reini, why would you think these highly specialized modules are worth
bundling in the main perl package?
well, why no
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Reini Urban wrote:
Gerrit,
Shouldn't your next perl update also include our own perl libs?
These are the libs required by upset?
Indeed.
Reini, why would you think these highly specialized modules are worth
bundling in the main perl package?
You could always ITP them sepera
Reini Urban wrote:
Gerrit,
Shouldn't your next perl update also include our own perl libs?
These are the libs required by upset?
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/Cygwin/
cvd -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/sourceware \
co -d /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/ infra/bin/cygwin/Cygwin
Gerrit
--
=
Michael W. J. West schrieb:
I recently followed the advice at
http://fairtomiddlin.blogspot.com/2004/09/cygwin.html
and noting:
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2004-01/msg00011.html
and apparently got libwin32-0.191 patched and handcrafted to build for
perl 5.8.5 on cygwin, pass many test
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 01:20:40PM -0700, Shankar Unni wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
People usually have very differing notions of what "sense" is "common".
:-)
Yeah, really! Why do they call it "common sense" when it's anything but
common?
YEAH! I'l
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 01:20:40PM -0700, Shankar Unni wrote:
>Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>>People usually have very differing notions of what "sense" is "common".
>>:-)
>
>Yeah, really! Why do they call it "common sense" when it's anything but
>common?
YEAH! I'll SAY! And don't get me started on
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
People usually have very differing notions of what "sense" is "common". :-)
Yeah, really! Why do they call it "common sense" when it's anything but
common?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Hannu E K Nevalainen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > FWIW, why not include a link to http://www.acronymfinder.com or
> > something similar.
>
> Argh! Never mind. :-d
0:-)
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,-
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Alex Vinokur wrote:
> "Igor Pechtchanski" wrote:
> [snip]
> > Please select "Reinstall" for all of the packages in your zzz3.txt file.
> [snip]
>
> "Select Packages" has the following actions:
> * Keep
> * Retrieve
> * Source
> * Uninstall
>
> I didn't find "Reinstall".
Dave
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 02:15:08PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>Would changing
>
> If you see an acronym not listed here on the list, please send
> comments and suggestions to the Cygwin list.
>
>to
>
> If you see an acronym not
Gerrit,
Shouldn't your next perl update also include our own perl libs?
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/Cygwin/
cvd -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/sourceware \
co -d /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/ infra/bin/cygwin/Cygwin
--
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/
--
Unsubscrib
"Igor Pechtchanski" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
> Please select "Reinstall" for all of the packages in your zzz3.txt file.
[snip]
"Select Packages" has the following actions:
* Keep
* Retrieve
* Source
* Uninstall
I didn't find "Reinstall".
--
Alex Vinokur
email: alex
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> FWIW, why not include a link to http://www.acronymfinder.com or
> something similar.
Argh! Never mind. :-d
/Hannu E K Nevalainen, B.Sc. EE Microcomputer systems--72-->
** mailing list preference; please keep replies on list **
-- printf("LocalTime: UTC+%
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 01:22:53PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of asmith
>>> Sent: 26 October 2004 13:18
>>
>>> 0a.important.mail
>>
>> Not so important you have to send it every ten minutes!
>>
>>> RFC not in l
Stepan Kasal schrieb:
Hello Gerrit,
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 05:40:19PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
I'm sorry, I don't know enough about autoconf / m4 programming to
integrate this into autoconf.
well, you don't need much special knowledge (I hope).
You wrote the most of the macro for me. Then I
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 01:51:43PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 01:22:53PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> >> >> -Original Message-
> >> >> From: cygwin-owner On
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 01:51:43PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 01:22:53PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> >> -Original Message-
>> >> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of asmith
>> >> Sent: 26 October 2004 13:18
>> >
>>
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 01:22:53PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of asmith
> >> Sent: 26 October 2004 13:18
> >
> >> 0a.important.mail
> >
> > Not so important you have to send it every te
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Alex Vinokur wrote:
> "Igor Pechtchanski" wrote:
>
> > I have a feeling your postinstall scripts didn't run properly because
> > of the screwed-up mounts. In fact, run
> >
> > find /etc/postinstall -name \*.done | sed 's/\.done$//' | xargs cygcheck -f | uniq
>
> $ find /etc/po
Jacek Trzmiel wrote:
svn checkout of file with svn:eol-style set to native does create:
a) on binary mount - file with unix endlines,
b) on text mode mount - also file with unix endlines.
I assume that correct behaviour in second case should be to create file
with windows endlines. Is my assumpti
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS) wrote:
> The following test case is distilled from the LAPACK timing test cases.
> These used to work on some previous versions of cygwin/g77, but now fail.
>
> The reduced test case is
>
> integer n
> parameter( n = 39*1024*1024 ) !
Alain,
Please send Cygwin-related questions to the Cygwin mailing list at . Not only will you get access to more expertise than
any one person can provide, but your questions and the replies to them
will get archived on the web for others to find.
I've forwarded this reply to the list and set th
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've confirmed that it works correctly, even on net-shares using zsh
> as starting shell, on my Windows NT SP6a.
Thanks.
> One minor glitch is that, name of window becomes bash.exe ;-)
Kind of expected behaviour documented in help text. Have a look at:
http://bi
svn checkout of file with svn:eol-style set to native does create:
a) on binary mount - file with unix endlines,
b) on text mode mount - also file with unix endlines.
I assume that correct behaviour in second case should be to create file
with windows endlines. Is my assumption correct, and the
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 01:22:53PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of asmith
>> Sent: 26 October 2004 13:18
>
>> 0a.important.mail
>
> Not so important you have to send it every ten minutes!
>
>> RFC not in list
>>
>> Request for Comment
>
>
Chuck wrote:
> New alpha versions of libtool available for test. This is
> very close to what libtool-2.0 will be. Please evaluate.
I have further problems in that linking against -ldxguid prevents
a library from being linked as a dll. I only get a static lib,
which is not what I want.
I realiz
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Alex Vinokur
> Sent: 26 October 2004 15:09
> "Dave Korn" wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Alex Vinokur
> > > Sent: 26 October 2004 06:08
> >
> > > "Dave K
"Dave Korn" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Alex Vinokur
> > Sent: 26 October 2004 06:08
>
> > "Dave Korn" wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [snip]
> > > Have you previously installed "For all users" and now
>
I recently followed the advice at
http://fairtomiddlin.blogspot.com/2004/09/cygwin.html
and noting:
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2004-01/msg00011.html
and apparently got libwin32-0.191 patched and handcrafted to build for
perl 5.8.5 on cygwin, pass many tests, and install. It ran about
Stepan Kasal wrote:
Hello Gerrit,
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 05:40:19PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
I'm sorry, I don't know enough about autoconf / m4 programming to
integrate this into autoconf.
well, you don't need much special knowledge (I hope).
You wrote the most of the macro for me. Then I u
Chuck wrote:
> New alpha versions of libtool available for test. This is
> very close to
> what libtool-2.0 will be. Please evaluate.
>
> NOTE: cygwin maintainers: do NOT release any updates of your packages
> built using this version of libtool! Be sure to revert back to
> "regular" libtool-de
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Gerrit P. Haase
> Sent: 26 October 2004 08:37
> Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS) wrote:
>
> >>From: David Billinghurst
> >>
> >>The following test case is distilled from the LAPACK timing
> test cases.
> >>These used to work on some p
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Alex Vinokur
> Sent: 26 October 2004 06:08
> "Dave Korn" wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [snip]
> > Have you previously installed "For all users" and now
> you're trying to install "Just for
> > me", or perhaps vice-versa
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Robert Schmidt
> Sent: 25 October 2004 22:56
> Mark Paulus wrote:
> > Have you tried using a -- to indicate end of arguments
> > to cygstart:
> >
> > cygstart -- tail --version
> >
>
> Thanks! No, I hadn't, and that works great.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of asmith
> Sent: 26 October 2004 13:18
> 0a.important.mail
Not so important you have to send it every ten minutes!
> RFC not in list
>
> Request for Comment
My comment is that it's not cygwin-specific.
cheers,
DaveK
-
0a.important.mail
RFC not in list
Request for Comment
--
Andrew in Edinburgh,Scotland
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com
Hi
I noticed that RFC wasn't on the list
Request for Comment
--
Andre in Edinburgh,Scotland
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygw
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Stephen Powell
> Sent: 25 October 2004 10:17
> I put "%f" in "/etc/email/email.sig" to get a quote from fortune in my
> signature, email sends the mail but without the signature line.
> Is it possible to run fortune as "/usr/bin/fortu
Markus Schönhaber wrote:
[snip]
nor from cygwin shell. Not a big problem, but annoying. Any ideas on
how to
get rid of it?
Assuming you created
C:\some\path\nul
using
del \\.\C:\some\path\nul
in the Windows console might help you to get rid of it.
I think even that will fail.
The trick I ususally
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 06:16:40PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
> I'd better fix it upstream so they'll get it without any notice.
even if it gets to autoconf and they upgrade, they sill have to put
AC_HEADER_RESOLV to their configure.ac (unless they use autoscan).
Stepan
--
Unsubscribe inf
Hello Gerrit,
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 05:40:19PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> I'm sorry, I don't know enough about autoconf / m4 programming to
> integrate this into autoconf.
well, you don't need much special knowledge (I hope).
You wrote the most of the macro for me. Then I used the definit
Mironov, Leonid {PBG} wrote:
Once when I felt particulary stupid, I've added redirection to 'nul' instead
of '/dev/null' to a program run from cygwin cron. Now I've got a file called
'nul' on NTFS disk and can do nothing about it neither with windows tools
nor from cygwin shell. Not a big problem,
Reini Urban wrote:
> Peter Ekberg schrieb:
>> Reini Urban wrote:
>>> Peter Ekberg schrieb:
>>>
I have one problem with libtool 1.9d, that I suspect is still
present in 1.9f. If I specify -lpthread when linking, libtool
searches for a real file matching -lpthread, like this:
>>
> Once when I felt particulary stupid, I've added redirection to 'nul'
> instead of '/dev/null' to a program run from cygwin cron. Now I've got a
> file called 'nul' on NTFS disk and can do nothing about it neither with
> windows tools nor from cygwin shell. Not a big problem, but annoying. Any
> i
Once when I felt particulary stupid, I've added redirection to 'nul' instead
of '/dev/null' to a program run from cygwin cron. Now I've got a file called
'nul' on NTFS disk and can do nothing about it neither with windows tools
nor from cygwin shell. Not a big problem, but annoying. Any ideas on ho
Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS) wrote:
From: David Billinghurst
The following test case is distilled from the LAPACK timing test cases.
These used to work on some previous versions of cygwin/g77, but now fail.
I translated the problem into C using f2c. It becomes:
$ cat labugc.c
int main() {
st
> From: David Billinghurst
>
> The following test case is distilled from the LAPACK timing test cases.
> These used to work on some previous versions of cygwin/g77, but now fail.
I translated the problem into C using f2c. It becomes:
$ cat labugc.c
int main() {
static float a[39*1024*1024];
63 matches
Mail list logo
