Hello all
Something just happened with my Cygwin installation. I just had to
reinstall Cygwin from the net because I accidentally broke some things.
Anyway, the reason doesn't matter.
The install went apparently fine until I noticed to absence of the Bin
directory. I've looked on Google for tha
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 09:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Of course I'm aware that cygwin is now *64* bit compiled, and that I'm
> looking to compile a *32* bit module. So I guess my first question, is
> there backward compatibilty? And, if there is, how can I invoke it for
> successful compilation?
Before the upgrade to 1.5* - 64 bit cygwin, this used to compile with the
default configuration just fine. Now it can't. I am aware that the entire
perl libwin32-0.191 distribution never did work completely with cygwin -
especially named pipes. However, the Win32::Semaphore module *did* - and
befor
Oops!! My goof - I meant Win32::Semaphore. DOH!
-bk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 11/15/2003 05:10:54 PM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:cpan/gcc cannot compile perl module after cygwin 1.5*
Before the upgrade t
Before the upgrade to 1.5* - 64 bit cygwin, this used to compile with the
default configuration just fine.
Now it can't. I am aware that the entire perl IPC distribution never did
ever work with cygwin - especially named pipes. However, the Semaphore
module *did* - and before the 1.5* upgrade, comp
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 03:39:36PM -0600, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 11:32:58PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> Lets recap:
>> 1) X posts a message about a non-cygwin topic
>
>Sorry, but X postings are off-topic for this list.
>
>(ducks)
Heh. Probably the funniest
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 11:32:58PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Lets recap:
> 1) X posts a message about a non-cygwin topic
Sorry, but X postings are off-topic for this list.
(ducks)
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com
> It doesn't. Cygwin != Linux.
>
> Also, AFAIK, if a Linux application is directly including linux/*, it is
> broken.
Not necessarily. Not every application is designed to work across different
platforms. Sometimes a programmer may choice to sacrifice portability for
some other advantage. In f
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 08:06, Christian Weinberger wrote:
> After some investigation I found an interim solution to get the current
> cygwin squid version (2.4-STABLE7) working with the new 1.5 DLL series.
> This has been tested and works for me with 1.5.5, but should work with
> all 1.5 versions
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 06:09, Brian Ford wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> > Btw, I've moved this discussion here from cygwin-patches because we are
> > talking about a change which could impact a number of people. Robert is
> > submitting patches which increase the maxim
> Anyway, can we *please* just drop this noise now.
Agreed - enough.
> I'll gladly relinquish it if it'll make you feel better.
HECK NO!! cgf doesn't give those out every day - and besides, in my not
so humble opinion you've contributed MORE than enough to deserve one
outside of this *noise* - a
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> BRAVO!
>
> My hearty congratulations to Mr. Ford.
>
> I'm sure it will look good on his resume.
>
> >>> *I was actually given Brian Ford*
>
> I thought slavery in this country ended with the Civil War, or is Mr. Ford
> a form of *artificial intellige
BRAVO!
My hearty congratulations to Mr. Ford.
I'm sure it will look good on his resume.
>>> *I was actually given Brian Ford*
I thought slavery in this country ended with the Civil War, or is Mr. Ford
a form of *artificial intelligence*?
Anyhow - how much do you want for him/it?
;-D
-bk
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 01:09:00PM -0600, Brian Ford wrote:
> >Well, since your soliciting opinions...
> >
> >I don't have much of one other than I'd really prefer to keep
> >PATH_MAX/MAX_PATH and define them to the largest allowable path so they
>
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 01:09:00PM -0600, Brian Ford wrote:
>On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> Btw, I've moved this discussion here from cygwin-patches because we are
>> talking about a change which could impact a number of people. Robert is
>> submitting patches which increase t
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 01:37:04PM -0500, Brian Kelly wrote:
>Why do I feel like I'm watching an Ed Wood movie?
>
>Thank God you guys write better code than you do comedy.
>
>Suggested ad copy for "attracting" more non-contributing end-users:
>
>Cygwin! - Come for the software, stay for the BERATEM
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Btw, I've moved this discussion here from cygwin-patches because we are
> talking about a change which could impact a number of people. Robert is
> submitting patches which increase the maximum path length for NT-class
> systems.
>
> My concern is
Why do I feel like I'm watching an Ed Wood movie?
Thank God you guys write better code than you do comedy.
Suggested ad copy for "attracting" more non-contributing end-users:
Cygwin! - Come for the software, stay for the BERATEMENT!
:-l
bits and bytes may break my code, but your 'word's will n
I am having trouble mounting a linking to a directory. The mounted file
doesn't go to "/" as I specified in the mount command instead it goes to
/cygdrive/c/Documents\ and\ Settings/erica. What am I doing wrong? This is
what I do:
$ mount -tf "c:\PalmDev" /PalmDev
$ ln -s "C:\Palm OS 5 SDK (6
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 11:21:41AM -0600, Brian Ford wrote:
>I'm sorry for being grumpy, but I just don't know what's left to tell.
>I guess WJM rubs off quickly, huh?
It's the subliminal messages we put in the cygwin DLL source code. As
soon as you start to become more knowledgeable about cygwin
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Lorenzo Travaglio wrote:
> > Ugh. Again, what OS and what filesystem, and:
> Sorry. Win98.
>
And FAT32, and did you read these?
> Brian Ford wrote:
> > More likely, you are running an NT variant at work and 9x at home? See:
> >
> > http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_toc.html#TOC45 a
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 11:45:34AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 07:07:26PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>>On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 15:43, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>Yes, I've already (obviously?) been to SUSv3. I wasn't talking about
>>>standards. I was talking about c
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 07:07:26PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 15:43, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>Yes, I've already (obviously?) been to SUSv3. I wasn't talking about
>>standards. I was talking about common practice.
>>
>>If you have a common practice web site that you wan
On 11/14/2003 5:42 PM, Randy W. Sims wrote:
> There is still a problem to be worked out, but I'm not yet sure where
the problem is. Can you tell post your perl & Cwd version.
>
> Dave, What versions of perl, Cwd, & M::B have you tested Alzabo with?
>
> This problem doesn't seem directly related t
Hi,
I started to use Cygwin recently. I'm having a problem with
authentication. I cannot login unless the user belongs to DomainAdmins
group.
I haven't modified my installation anyway. After installation I have
just added cygwin/bin directory to path environment variable and added
new environment
25 matches
Mail list logo
