Windows kbhit() function

Hi, I do have a Cygwin application (Windows 2000), which includes a kbhit() function and the Windows ethernet socket for TCP/UDP communication. But both doesn't work together. In this case I had to link the libmoldname.a in order to use the kbhit() function. Do you have any idea ? Or do you know a

IPC message queue through JNI may not work because of java exec !

Hi folks, I have a java graphical debugging tool which communicates with a process (written in C) both shall communicate through IPC message queue (historic : the tools where running under solaris) The point is : >From java side, ipc message queue is created with the help of a native dll beeing

Bug in dumper

Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: Does dumper.exe work? Well, i should have answered this, but unfortunately, i have no access to windows machine right now to debug, or even verify this. Upon execution I see the following in the cygwin console: $ ./div.exe 7 [main] div 2296 handle_exceptions

Re: bash's (built-in) type command can not handle spaces in paths

At 01:51 AM 2/28/2003 -0800, Jeremy Hetzler wrote: What is different about your particular installation, I have no idea. Actually, one idea. Your 'type' might be an alias or function that fails to quote its arguments properly. Try "builtin type -a type". If it doesn't return precisely "type is

Re: bash's (built-in) type command can not handle spaces in paths

At 03:19 PM 2/27/2003 -0800, Curtis Siemens wrote: Cygwin's type command (built into bash.exe) does not work for executables that are under a directory that has spaces. Well, it seems to work OK for me: --- 501 $ mkdir /foo\ bar 502 $ touch /foo\ bar/baz 503 $ chmod a+x /foo\ bar/baz 504 $ PATH=/us

Re: Permission bits

On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 09:21:29PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:23:07PM -0800, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > >I really wish I understood Windows security and ACLs, etc and how they > >map or don't map to Cygwin's Posix file permissions but alas I don't. > >Can somebody

English speller to spell plain files

Is there any English speller in Cygwin to spell plain files from command line ? = Alex Vinokur mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.simtel.net/pub/oth/19088.html = -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#

Re: getopts, POSIX, and the sh(1) man page

On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 10:03:36PM -0600, Peter Seebach wrote: >Shouldn't the sh(1) man page mention the lack of getopts, rather than >documenting a feature which apparently got taken out? Yep. I'll remove it. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting:

Re: use cygwin generated dll in vc program

On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, xiao chen wrote: > > > dear everyone, > > > > another question is, > > how can i apply the dll generated in cygwin to windows? > > when i link my program to dll and compile in cygwin enviroment, it does > > work. but when i link

Re: use cygwin generated dll in vc program

On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, xiao chen wrote: > dear everyone, > > another question is, > how can i apply the dll generated in cygwin to windows? > when i link my program to dll and compile in cygwin enviroment, it does > work. but when i link the .a file generated to vc++ enviroment and try to > compile

getopts, POSIX, and the sh(1) man page

Shouldn't the sh(1) man page mention the lack of getopts, rather than documenting a feature which apparently got taken out? For that matter, it seems to me that taking out a core POSIX feature is not a very good way to make a shell smaller. getopts(1) was standardized because it's VERY USEFUL. A

Re: Dumper.exe problems

On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 10:52:56PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >"dumper.exe" is part of the "cygwin" package: > > >There were some problems in the past with rebuilding from source tarballs >(you'll need at least the w32api sourc

Re: cpp0.exe- entry point not found

Chenxiao, On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, xiao chen wrote: > dear everyone, > can anyone help me to handle this error? > " the prodedure entry point _ctype_ could not be located in the dynamic link > library cygwin1.dll" > > i guess the problem comes due to the mismatch of cygwin1.dll in my > enviroment and

use cygwin generated dll in vc program

dear everyone, another question is, how can i apply the dll generated in cygwin to windows? when i link my program to dll and compile in cygwin enviroment, it does work. but when i link the .a file generated to vc++ enviroment and try to compile my program, it fails at running.. can someone hel

cpp0.exe- entry point not found

dear everyone, can anyone help me to handle this error? " the prodedure entry point _ctype_ could not be located in the dynamic link library cygwin1.dll" i guess the problem comes due to the mismatch of cygwin1.dll in my enviroment and in my project..they have different size and version. how can

Re: Dumper.exe problems

On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Jon A. Lambert wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:02:24PM -0500, Jon A. Lambert wrote: > > >Does dumper.exe work? > > > > > >I am unable to get the dumper utility to produce a core dump. > > >I have read the FAQ, the webpages and searched

Re: Printing from cygwin?

On Thu Feb 27 15:53:59 2003, Rick Rankin wrote: > Do you know for sure which lpr you're using? Win2K has one in > C:\WINNT\system32. Try /cygdrive/c/WINNT/system32/lpr -S server -P printer filename it worked for me. -ajay > > --Rick > --- Charles Krug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm having t

Re: setup dies on local install

On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Randall R Schulz wrote: > At 18:27 2003-02-27, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Randall R Schulz wrote: > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > This whole business comes under the "going against the grain" theme. > > > You're going to have much better luck, far fewer head

Re: setup dies on local install

Steve, Well, you don't _have_ to use Setup.exe, but if you don't, you need to know how it re-arranges the directory structure between the mirror host and the local directory. Again, check out the messages I referred to and choose either Michael Chase's (Perl) or my (BASH) scripts to do the dow

Re: setup dies on local install

Randall, In one word oh. Didn't think that setup could do that ... but I didn't try setup.exe in the first place 'cause I was on a Linux box. It might be nice if there were some way to download w/o resorting to an exe file. When I get the chance, I'll run setup.exe from a Windows machine

Re: Permission bits

Igor Pechtchanski wrote: I have experienced similar symptoms on SAMBA drives. Try comparing the output of "id" with the numbers in the "ls -ln" output. I have a feeling either your /etc/passwd is not up to date on your work machine (i.e., you forgot to do "mkpasswd -d -u adefaria >> /etc/passwd

Re: setup dies on local install

At 18:27 2003-02-27, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Randall R Schulz wrote: > [snip] > > This whole business comes under the "going against the grain" theme. > You're going to have much better luck, far fewer headaches and keep you > hair a lot longer if you do things the way they'r

Re: Dumper.exe problems

Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 12:02:24PM -0500, Jon A. Lambert wrote: > >Does dumper.exe work? > > > >I am unable to get the dumper utility to produce a core dump. > >I have read the FAQ, the webpages and searched the mailing lists. > > > >My cygwin.bat startup file contains t

Re: setup dies on local install

On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Randall R Schulz wrote: > [snip] > > This whole business comes under the "going against the grain" theme. > You're going to have much better luck, far fewer headaches and keep you > hair a lot longer if you do things the way they're intended to be done. > Furthermore, you're g

Re: Permission bits

On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:23:07PM -0800, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >I really wish I understood Windows security and ACLs, etc and how they >map or don't map to Cygwin's Posix file permissions but alas I don't. >Can somebody explain to me the following: > >On my Windows XP box at home I can easily ma

Re: setup dies on local install

Steve, Did you use Setup to do the download, or did you use some other tool? If it was the latter, then most likely you did not create the proper directory naming convention required by Setup.exe. As for providing Cygwin in a single grotesque tarball, that's really infeasible. Updates happen f

Re: Permission bits

On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > I really wish I understood Windows security and ACLs, etc and how they > map or don't map to Cygwin's Posix file permissions but alas I don't. > Can somebody explain to me the following: > > On my Windows XP box at home I can easily manipulate permissio

Re: Setup "Download from Internet" Question

On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [snip] > 2. If you already have Cygwin installed, then this isn't helping if what you > want is a complete ground level download. I've found it convenient to render > Windows temporarily Cygwin-unaware by typing > umount -A > at the Cygwin prompt,

setup dies on local install

Hi, I downloaded everything labeled "base" and whatever else I wanted from a Cygwin mirror, preserving the directory tree, so I could burn a CD for installs on two machines that will not have internet access. (Why, oh why, dear God, can't Red Hat just make a big archive file?) So before burning

Re: file name case sensitivity

Gerald S. Williams wrote: [snip] But as I said, this is OT for Cygwin. Even if it is added to Cygwin, it will almost certainly not be the default behavior. But for people like me trying to maintain Cygwin versions of Unix projects, it could be a real boon. Indeed. In my case, it would require modi

Re: Setup "Download from Internet" Question

David, At 13:51 2003-02-27, David Starks-Browning wrote: On Thursday 27 Feb 03, BB writes: > As a followup question, In order to create a CD to install from, would it be > better to simply ftp the files from one of the mirror sites. Yes. > What would the correct directory structure have to be f

objdump creates huge file

Hi.. I'm trying to compiled my code into a small binary image. I used ld --strip-all to link together a PE executable of 22K, but when I used objcopy to convert it to a raw binary, I got an image that was over twice that size.(54K) What is causing it to be so big? How can I make it smaller? J

Re: Printing from cygwin?

Do you know for sure which lpr you're using? Win2K has one in C:\WINNT\system32. --Rick --- Charles Krug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm having trouble with cygwin lpr printing to my default Win2k printer. > A search of the archives revealed many mailings from people who > similarly could not pri

No/ntsec + ACL + Mount Options = ???

Hi, [ I composed this this morning before Andrew DeFaria sent his recent message: "Subject: Permission bits" and didn't know whether to sent it. I guess I will, as a second to Andrew's request. ] As I understand it, the following factors all contribute to the ultimate determination of the POSI

Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH not accessible through java under cygwin for JNI

Alan, Thanks for that. Actually, I had an ulterior motive in directing Gilles here--I'm just about to embark on my first attempt at JNI programming and I need to evaluate the suitability of using Cygwin and / or MinGW for producing JNI libraries to use with the Sun JVM and any pointers I can g

Permission bits

I really wish I understood Windows security and ACLs, etc and how they map or don't map to Cygwin's Posix file permissions but alas I don't. Can somebody explain to me the following: On my Windows XP box at home I can easily manipulate permissions: [Home XP]: touch file [Home XP]: ls -l file -r

Re: Setup "Download from Internet" Question

This works for me. I'd hate to guarantee anything, particularly if you have a version of Cygwin running already. But I've done it more than once, and on more than one version of Windows. 1. I think ftp, unless controlled in a not at all simple or obvious way, will bring you the entire Cygwin resou

bash's (built-in) type command can not handle spaces in paths

My platform is Windows 2000 (with all the latest patches). This problem probably occurs on a number of Windows platforms. I'm using the latest released Cygwin with Cygwin DLL release version 1.3.20-1 I've searched the Web/Faq/Documentation/Mailing-Lists and haven't seen any reference to this prob

Re: change bc to use readline

On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 02:41:53PM -0800, Philip Nemec wrote: >I recently installed another fresh copy of cygwin and was reminded of a >complaint I have with bc... Perhaps you'd like to be the bc maintainer? I rarely use it and have no burning desire to continue to support it. If so, peruse htt

Algum brasileiro usa Cygwin ?

I need to get it working. http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-01/msg00048.html -- [EMAIL PROTECTED], dyndns.org} -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ:

Re: threads question

On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:49:15PM -0600, wayne wrote: >I was wondering what the current status of using threads are for >cygwin? I have a project that I am starting and am considering using >threads. The clients would be all flavors of Windows including 95 to >XP. I know this is rather vague bu

Printing from cygwin?

I'm having trouble with cygwin lpr printing to my default Win2k printer. A search of the archives revealed many mailings from people who similarly could not print using the cygwin lpr, but I couldn't find any stories of "success." I invoke: lpr -Pserver\\printer file Printer is considered by

change bc to use readline

I recently installed another fresh copy of cygwin and was reminded of a complaint I have with bc... It doesn't ship with readline support built in - and the source doesn't ship in a way that builds. To get bc to compile (grabbing source using setup - the simple case): * scan.l -- comment out th

Re: threads question

-Original Message- From: wayne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:49:15 -0600 Subject: threads question I was wondering what the current status of using threads are for cygwin? I have a project that I am starting and am considering using threads. The cl

Re: Setup "Download from Internet" Question

David Starks-Browning wrote: > On Thursday 27 Feb 03, BB writes: >> As a followup question, In order to create a CD to install from, >> would it be better to simply ftp the files from one of the mirror >> sites. > > Yes. Partially. A plain FTP mirror will get you current and previous versions of e

Issue when running non-cygwin programs with rsh

Hello, I've noticed that stdout doesn't seem to be properly redirected when a non-cygwin program is executed via rsh. You can easily observe the problem. For that, compile your favorite hello world program with and without the no-cygwin flag: home $ gcc -o hello_cygwin hello.c home $ gcc -

threads question

I was wondering what the current status of using threads are for cygwin? I have a project that I am starting and am considering using threads. The clients would be all flavors of Windows including 95 to XP. I know this is rather vague but I am really only looking for info about wither I should t

Re: Setup "Download from Internet" Question

On Thursday 27 Feb 03, BB writes: > As a followup question, In order to create a CD to install from, would it be > better to simply ftp the files from one of the mirror sites. Yes. > What would the > correct directory structure have to be for setup to install from the > d:\cygwin-setup as a loca

bug report - DLL failure on win ME with gcc-3

Hi I have come across a problem with dlopened dlls and fork() on Windows ME, that is not related to the rebase issue. The problem does not occur on win 2k. Dlls linked using gcc-3 and loaded with dlopen() will cause the program to fail if it fork()s. In my testing, this is true of every dll I have

Re: Setup "Download from Internet" Question

As a followup question, In order to create a CD to install from, would it be better to simply ftp the files from one of the mirror sites. What would the correct directory structure have to be for setup to install from the d:\cygwin-setup as a local source assuming d: was a cd? Would this be enoug

Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH not accessible through java under cygwin for JNI

Gilles - The following should work for you under Cygwin: HelloWorld.c: - #include using namespace std; #include "HelloWorld_jni.h" JNIEXPORT void JNICALL Java_HelloWorld_sayHello( JNIEnv *env, jclass c ) { cerr << "Hello World fr

Setup "Download from Internet" Question

What is the correct way to use setup's "Download from Internet" option to download all of the Cygwin packages without installing them? I am trying to download all of the Cygwin packages so I can put them on a CD. I have to install Cygwin on a machine without internet access. Below is a summary o

Re: tetex 2.0.1-1 listed under 'previous' in setup.ini

I was just discussing this with Jan Nieuwenhuizen, and I believe he's going to take care of it. --Rick --- Ton van Overbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I noticed when tetex and lilypond were released yesterday, that only > lilypond showed up in setup.exe. Checking the downloaded setup.ini made >

Re: cygwin1.dll archive?

C. J. wrote: > Cygwin 1.3.20-1 contains some regressions from 1.3.19 that break our > tcsh scripts and our build process. I haven't taken the time to try > to isolate them enough to submit a bug report (beyond verifying that > installing 1.3.19 fixes the problems) so when 1.3.21 is released my > p

cygwin1.dll archive?

Cygwin 1.3.20-1 contains some regressions from 1.3.19 that break our tcsh scripts and our build process. I haven't taken the time to try to isolate them enough to submit a bug report (beyond verifying that installing 1.3.19 fixes the problems) so when 1.3.21 is released my problems may still

tetex 2.0.1-1 listed under 'previous' in setup.ini

I noticed when tetex and lilypond were released yesterday, that only lilypond showed up in setup.exe. Checking the downloaded setup.ini made clear why: tetex 20020911-1 is still listed as the current version, while tetex 2.0.1-1 is now listed as the previous version. Probably the automated product

Re: 1.30 gcc cannot exec \'cc1\'

Sergey Okhapkin wrote: > gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `cc1': No such file or directory > configure: failed program was: > You might want to look and see if you have any broken symlinks. I only find one for cc1.exe and that would be because of using mingw32 (I think) and it doesn't appe

RE: Cygwin & DLL

Hello from Gregg C Levine No the Internet record, is 20. Mostly a rambling collection of nonsense. But I did see a revolting line of gibberish that posed as the signature. -- Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Try not. Do. Or do not. There is no try." Master Yoda -

Re: Cygwin & DLL

* Frederic BOYER (03-02-27 19:32 +0100) > [...] > [Disclaimer] I /love/ the disclaimer: *fifteen* lines! God! Does anyone know if this a new record? World record? Internet record? Cygwin Mailing List record? Still impressed, Thorsten -- Disclaimer: I am in no way responsible for any of the s

Re: Cygwin & DLL

Frederic BOYER wrote: > Hello, > > I read the documentation about Cygwin and try to compile a C++ program > which use a Open Client Sybase Lib. It compile correctly but at the > link I've > got the following message : > > It seems that CW does not find the reference symbol. The DLL is in my > path.

Cygwin & DLL

Hello, I read the documentation about Cygwin and try to compile a C++ program which use a Open Client Sybase Lib. It compile correctly but at the link I've got the following message : It seems that CW does not find the reference symbol. The DLL is in my path. I've try to generate a .a lib with DL

Re: pdksh installation

"Paul Coltrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I am also looking forward to the release of a built-in ksh for > Cygwin. > > And, I can see that you wouldn't want to bug the maintainer with > frivilous questions that would delay what you are looking for. > > However,

Re: UW pop3 no mail listed

> > I think that a more appropriate mailing list for your question may be the UW > imapd list. > > http://www.washington.edu/imap/c-client-list.html > Sorry for the post. I thought this might've been cygwin related, but it's definitely not. Apparently the pop server is an interface to the ima

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: lilypond-1.6.8-2 for Cygwin

The 1.6.8-1 release from yesterday had an almost empty lilypond-doc package. That's fixed with this release. Yesterday's bulky release info: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2003-02/msg00034.html still applies, if you read -2 for -1 in the obvious places. Greetings, Jan. *** CYGW

Re: sh crashes when executing msgfmt

Andreas, I'm glad I was able to help. I have one comment, however. Your answer was addressed to me rather than the Cygwin list. Since I'm subscribed to the list, an answer there would get to me, but more importantly would be available to others, as well as being part of the mail archive, ind

Re: UW pop3 no mail listed

Wes, I think that a more appropriate mailing list for your question may be the UW imapd list. http://www.washington.edu/imap/c-client-list.html I don't use ipop3d, but I have been using imapd for quite awhile now without problems, however I've been running the 2000c version. If you are running

Re: pdksh installation

I am also looking forward to the release of a built-in ksh for Cygwin. And, I can see that you wouldn't want to bug the maintainer with frivilous questions that would delay what you are looking for. However, I don't see a problem with making and playing in your own mud-puddle. Here is what I

Re: pdksh installation

"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 10:06:25AM -0600, BB wrote: > >Well, I guess this would be the wrong mailing list for the question. > >Perhaps 'applications' would have been the correct place. But, I still > >think the ques

Re: pdksh installation

On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 10:06:25AM -0600, BB wrote: >Well, I guess this would be the wrong mailing list for the question. >Perhaps 'applications' would have been the correct place. But, I still >think the question is a good on that deserves and answer. I'm sure that >those that do know how to ins

Re: mem allocation / heap_chunk

Randall R Schulz wrote: Fabrice, It would seem that the answer is right there on the page you referenced. You can script a change to that registry entry via the Cygwin regtool script. You can do this in an install or post-install script or upon each invocation of your application, providing it

Re: mem allocation / heap_chunk

Fabrice, It would seem that the answer is right there on the page you referenced. You can script a change to that registry entry via the Cygwin regtool script. You can do this in an install or post-install script or upon each invocation of your application, providing it's invoked via a script.

Re: mem allocation / heap_chunk

On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Fabrice Marchal wrote: > Hi, > I have come accross the 384 Mb limit for allocating memory in cygwin. > (e.g. char* pnt = new char[ long size = 500*1024*1024 ]; will not work ) > > I have been able to modify this using the workaround documented in the > Users Guide (http://cyg

mem allocation / heap_chunk

Hi, I have come accross the 384 Mb limit for allocating memory in cygwin. (e.g. char* pnt = new char[ long size = 500*1024*1024 ]; will not work ) I have been able to modify this using the workaround documented in the Users Guide (http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/setup-maxmem.html) I would like to

Re: pdksh installation

"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:45:36PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, you (whoever you are) wrote: > >>I have read in the cygwin-apps list that pdksh is available. Until it > >>is officially an

Re: pdksh installation

"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:45:36PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, you (whoever you are) wrote: > >>I have read in the cygwin-apps list that pdksh is available. Until it > >>is officially an

Re: Can someone please answer this question I've posted repeatedlyeven if it is just to say slag off

On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 12:02:24PM -0500, Jon A. Lambert wrote: > >Does dumper.exe work? > >I am unable to get the dumper utility to produce a core dump. > >I have read the FAQ, the webpages and searched the mailing lists. > >My cygwin.bat startup fi

UW pop3 no mail listed

Hello, I built UW-imap & pop3 using the standard config (make cyg), and copied ipop3d to /usr/local/sbin I can run ipop3d from inetd or xinetd, and log in, but then I'm told I've have no mail (I've about 30 messages on the mailspool). When I log in via ssh, I see the $MAIL variable is properl

RE: Can someone please answer this question I've posted repeatedly even if it is just to say slag off

I've attached strace output of dumper attempt producing same message. I started a cat >/dev/null in another rxvt window and then after using ps -el strace dumper.exe --verbose -d /bin/cat.exe 4226590139 >dumper.cat.strace The screen had that same setting bfd architecture: No error message. What I f

Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH not accessible through java under cygwin for JNI

Ronald, At 04:10 2003-02-27, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, gilles bourgeois wrote: > hi folks, > > I am currently using my JNI so/dll library under solaris, linux and cygwin. > with solaris and linux, no problem, I bind to it using load(..) since the > LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set.

Re: make refuses to enter "unix-mode". Problem disappeared

Hi, sorry for disturbing. After an (involuntary) reinstall of Perl 5.8.0 the problem is not reproducable anymore. -Markus Markus Hanke wrote: > Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Markus Hanke wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > in short the following lines say most of the problem:

Re: exim 4.12-3 winsock problem (was Re: 1.3.21)

Pierre, On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 09:12:41AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > While you are at it, can you enhance the educational experience ^^ Serves me right for idle *and* public reflections... :,) > by looking at the starting wso

GNU C/C++ no longer works anymore...

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/My Documents/C++ $ cat time.cc #include #include int main() { time_t tp; tp = time(NULL); char *s = asctime(localtime(&tp)); cout << s << endl; return 0; } [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/My Documents/C++ $ c++ time.cc c++: installation problem, cannot exec `cc1plus': No su

RE: Can someone please answer this question I've posted repeatedly even if it is just to say slag off

I failed to mention that the process never exits when I force a core dump so it appears that the dumper never actually attaches to the process. -Original Message- From: Madsen, Mark Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 9:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Can someone please answer this

Re: Can someone please answer this question I've posted repeatedly even if it is just to say slag off

On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 12:02:24PM -0500, Jon A. Lambert wrote: >Does dumper.exe work? > >I am unable to get the dumper utility to produce a core dump. >I have read the FAQ, the webpages and searched the mailing lists. > >My cygwin.bat startup file contains the following: > set CYGWIN=error_start=

RE: Can someone please answer this question I've posted repeatedly even if it is just to say slag off

I experience the same problem on several different machines (all W2K), and on different versions of cygwin. I can not even force a core dump of a process that is just a simple infinite loop. This is the result of that: $ dumper -d c:/fcore 872 dumping process #872 to fcore.core setting bfd archit

enscript + lprng = cygthread::detach message?

Hi all, I'm using enscript to print some ascii pages with LPRng. Everything works fine and the documents print OK, but I get the following messages: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /c/tmp $ enscript.exe -B a_addr1.fld 6 [main] lpr 3644 cygthread::detach: WFSO sigwait failed, res 4294967295 1635 [mai

RE: 1.30 gcc cannot exec \'cc1\'

hi i had similiar problems with gcc and cygwin-1.3.20-1 switching back to cygwin-1.3.19-1 solved the problem for me. lg mike --- I have the same problem while attempting to configure in cygwin source tree, configure fails in opcodes directory. Note the f

Re: make refuses to enter "unix-mode"

On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 12:08:18PM +0100, Markus Hanke wrote: >So it seems, that my environment variable "make_mode" is correctly set >to use posix style things. Wy does make work then, if I pass "--unix", >which should not be neccessary? I searched for the sources of >make.exe, but didn't find a

Re: cygwin1.dll, nontsec, and NTFS disk issue

On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:21:42PM +0800, Wu Yongwei wrote: >You are correct about file permissions, Christopher. > >We all know that Windows has loose file permissions and all files are >marked executable by default. When CYGWIN=nontsec, > >Old behaviour: when an executable is wanted, the system

Re: make refuses to enter "unix-mode"

Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Markus Hanke wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > in short the following lines say most of the problem: > > __ > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/.cpan/build/Digest-MD5-2.23 > > $ set | grep -i make_mode > > MAKE_MODE=unix > > > >

RE: file name case sensitivity

Sorry this is getting a bit OT... Shankar Unni wrote: > Very interesting. Once you do create such files [...], will regular > Windows programs be able to even look at that directory? Or will > they choke on those names [...] ? Obviously, you need to do something special to get at the files or the

Re: make refuses to enter "unix-mode"

On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Markus Hanke wrote: > Hi, > > in short the following lines say most of the problem: > __ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/.cpan/build/Digest-MD5-2.23 > $ set | grep -i make_mode > MAKE_MODE=unix > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/.cpan/build/Digest-MD5-2.23 >

Re: cc1.exe linking to missing export cygwin1.dll:_ctype_

xiao chen wrote: hi, can someone help me? i m using cygwin newest version to compile an old project. while i type "make", the error msg is "cc1.exe linking to the missing export cygwin1.dll:_ctype_"..i guess the cygwin1.dll in my old project doesnt match the new version in cygwin package i hv ju

Re: cygwin-1.3.20-1 breaks termcaps [actually permissions break them]

On Wednesday, February 26, 2003 at 17:14:24, Ronald Landheer-Cieslakq wrote: [...] > > Has someone a script to fix the permissions of all standard > > files to a reasonable value instead of +rx for all dirs and > > +r for all files? > $ chmod -R a+r * > ? > > or > $ find -type d -exec chmod go+rx

Re: cygwin1.dll, nontsec, and NTFS disk issue

THANKS. Your message solved my problem. I used to set CYGWIN=nontsec in my .bashrc. Now I set it in cygwin.bat, and all works well. Best regards, Wu Yongwei --- Original Message from Max Bowsher --- > New behaviour: when an executable is wanted, the system will check by > file permissions on

Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH not accessible through java under cygwin forJNI

On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, gilles bourgeois wrote: > hi folks, > I am currently using my JNI so/dll library under solaris, linux and cygwin. > with solaris and linux, no problem, I bind to it using load(..) since the > LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set. > BUT, under cygwin/windows, it does not work and I shall tell

Re: Can someone please answer this question I've posted repeatedlyeven if it is just to say slag off

Yes, dumper.exe works. On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Jon A. Lambert wrote: > Does dumper.exe work? > > I am unable to get the dumper utility to produce a core dump. > I have read the FAQ, the webpages and searched the mailing lists. > > My cygwin.bat startup file contains the following: > set CYGWIN=e

LD_LIBRARY_PATH not accessible through java under cygwin for JNI

hi folks, I am currently using my JNI so/dll library under solaris, linux and cygwin. with solaris and linux, no problem, I bind to it using load(..) since the LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set. BUT, under cygwin/windows, it does not work and I shall tell the absolute path when I load the library. I hav alrea

Re: cygwin1.dll, nontsec, and NTFS disk issue

Wu Yongwei wrote: > You are correct about file permissions, Christopher. > > We all know that Windows has loose file permissions and all files are > marked executable by default. When CYGWIN=nontsec, > > Old behaviour: when an executable is wanted, the system will check by > extension and conten

make refuses to enter "unix-mode"

Hi, in short the following lines say most of the problem: __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/.cpan/build/Digest-MD5-2.23 $ set | grep -i make_mode MAKE_MODE=unix [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/.cpan/build/Digest-MD5-2.23 $ make /c: Can't open /c: No such file or directory make: *

  1   2   >