RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gdb-20021215-1

2002-12-15 Thread Robb, Sam
> Any reason (besides lack of time/resources) for not updating to a > more recent release? Sigh. Please ignore the previous message and forgive my misinterpretation - I read and thought you were upgrading gdb *to* the release version from last April (5.2) That'll teach me to read "just one

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gdb-20021215-1

2002-12-15 Thread Robb, Sam
> I've made a new version of gdb available for download. This > version is > a refresh from the last version of gdb which was released in April of > 2001. It has a lot of bug fixes and probably some new bugs. Any reason (besides lack of time/resources) for not updating to a more recent releas

RE: New packages

2002-12-15 Thread Robert McNulty Junior
Never mind. I DL'd one at a time, instead of all three at once. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert McNulty Junior Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2002 11:49 PM To: Cygwin Subject: New packages The net downloads of gdb, groff and gcc-mingw

New packages

2002-12-15 Thread Robert McNulty Junior
The net downloads of gdb, groff and gcc-mingw gives me a "fail to change directory" error. I don't know what that means. I'll try later. Robert -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cyg

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gdb-20021215-1

2002-12-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
I've made a new version of gdb available for download. This version is a refresh from the last version of gdb which was released in April of 2001. It has a lot of bug fixes and probably some new bugs. I've made this available because, while the insight support is not quite right, gcc has been ev

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc-mingw-20020817-3

2002-12-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
I've made a new version of the gcc mingw package available for download. This version just fixes some problems with "uninstall", so it should now uninstall cleanly if that option is selected from setup.exe. This package is an adjunct to the gcc package. It adds the "-mno-cygwin" functionality to

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: groff-1.18.1-1

2002-12-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
I've made a new version of groff available for download. This is a refresh from the GNU web site, so it has whatever fixes are in this version. To update your installation, click on the "Install Cygwin now" link on the http://cygwin.com/ web page. This downloads setup.exe to your system. Then,

Re: Gcc 3.2 -mno-cygwin

2002-12-15 Thread Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
At 06:27 PM 12/15/2002, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 11:15:42AM -0800, Jim wrote: > >Someone broke GCC somewhere > > > >echo 'int main( void ) { return 1; }' >test.c > >gcc -mno-cygwin -c test.c > > > >results: > >gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `cc1': No such file

Re: Gcc 3.2 -mno-cygwin

2002-12-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
Redirecting this, too. On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 03:18:00PM -0800, Paul G. wrote: >Well, if your Win32 system doesn't support links (NT4 shortcuts), this >isn't really surprising. Did you actually read this email or were you just scanning for keywords like the word "link"? >NT4 has a shortcut/link

Re: Problems downloading and installing the basic package

2002-12-15 Thread Dmitry Epstein
At 11:17 AM 12/15/02 +, you wrote: Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 21:09:46 -0800 (PST) From: Elfyn McBratney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problems downloading and installing the basic package Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi, When you download

Re: Gcc 3.2 -mno-cygwin

2002-12-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 11:15:42AM -0800, Jim wrote: >Someone broke GCC somewhere > >echo 'int main( void ) { return 1; }' >test.c >gcc -mno-cygwin -c test.c > >results: >gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `cc1': No such file or directory > >there is definatly no cc1 with gcc 3.2 (not sure

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: patch-2.5.8-2

2002-12-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
I've updated the version of patch to 2.5.8-2. This is an official bug fix release. Three small Cygwin specific patches have been applied to allow input files with DOS line endings on binary mounted file systems. To update your installation, click on the "Install Cygwin now" link on the http://s

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cpio-2.5-1

2002-12-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
I've updated the version of cpio to 2.5-1. This is an official new release. To update your installation, click on the "Install Cygwin now" link on the http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin web page. This downloads setup.exe to your system. The, run setup and answer all of the questions. Note that

IBM Java 13 + JNI + Cygwin fails

2002-12-15 Thread Frank Traenkle
Hi, Calling a DLL under Cygwin from IBM Java13 via JNI fails if the DLL depends on cygwin1.dll. I am using the following versions: uname -a CYGWIN_NT-5.1 CALVIN 1.3.17(0.67/3/2) 2002-11-27 18:54 i686 unknown gcc-2 --version 2.95.3-10 java -version java version "1.3.0" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environ

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: less-378-1

2002-12-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
I've made a new version of less available for download. This is a refresh from the GNU web site, so it has whatever fixes are in this version. I've also linked this with the 'pcre' package so that perl regular expressions are available when searching. This means (among other things) that you can

anyone using distcc with cygwin without errors?

2002-12-15 Thread Heiko Elger
Hello, I'm trying distcc v0.15 - but without success. Using distcc like the following generates errors: $ distcc gcc -g -O0 -c -o modul1.o modul1.c distcc[2216] (dcc_scan_args) scanning arguments: gcc -g -O0 -c -o modul1.o modul1.c distcc[2216] (dcc_scan_args) found object/output file "modul1.o

Re: More pipe (and other) improvements in snapshot

2002-12-15 Thread Randall R Schulz
At 09:46 2002-12-15, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 01:36:29PM +0100, Arno Waschk wrote: >On Sat, 14 Dec 2002 21:11:28 -0500, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Absent any further details, this will be a potential problem in 1.3.18. > >If would be more than happy t

Re: More pipe (and other) improvements in snapshot

2002-12-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 01:36:29PM +0100, Arno Waschk wrote: >On Sat, 14 Dec 2002 21:11:28 -0500, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Absent any further details, this will be a potential problem in 1.3.18. > >If would be more than happy to provide further details, but it seems to >be di

Re: Giving up trying to get Cygwin OpenSSH3.5 to work on Win2000 Pro SP3

2002-12-15 Thread Max Bowsher
Emilio A Icaza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Can somebody help me figure out what can be wrong with this? I'll try. >> 1. Installed CYGWIN base and needed packages >> 2. Installed openssh 3.5p1-2 and requisites >> 3. Ran ssh-host-config to create keys, sshd user, and service, etc. Which does wo

Re: More pipe (and other) improvements in snapshot

2002-12-15 Thread Arno Waschk
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002 21:11:28 -0500, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 02:47:54AM +0100, Arno Waschk wrote: 2. Configure never complete "finding the maximum length of command-line arguments" test (found in many configures, e. g. gcc-CVS) which used to be lengt

RE: [list] Re: query

2002-12-15 Thread Chris January
> >hi > > > > i am new to cygwin enviornment i just downloaded it > >yesterday . i have an application written in linux > >downloaded from internet .it is a tar file . i want to > >run it on windows 2000 can i do it using cygwin . > > > > No but if you have the source you can build the applicatio

RE: can't manage to use "windows" command-line (C development)

2002-12-15 Thread Atreides
> >I explain : I want to launch "Pilot Install" from envicon.com with a text > >file (full path included) for parameter. I tried to launch it > using a cygwin > >shell, does not work... (argument is not understood by the > program). From a > >DOS Box (with properly arranged paths of course) : same