>From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 12:18:47PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>+> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes:
>+>
>+> >Of course we need to consider things like localization, etc.
>+>
>+> I'm sorry, but localization of messages
>From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Wednesday 09 November 2005 09:30 am, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 03:08:39PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> +> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pawel Jakub
>> Dawidek writes: +>
>> +>
>> +> >In current world order you can decid
>From: Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Some time ago, I was surprised to find that my son's oldish (mid 2003)
>system was happy to try and boot off a USB memory stick.
The BIOSes have been able to do this feat for a while now. There are two
caveats though:
1. It's slow, since BIOSes tend to u
>From: =?ISO646-US?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=3Frgrav?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sergey Babkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 1. It's slow, since BIOSes tend to use USB 1.x speeds, and even that
>> not in a really fast way. So the big images are best to be
>> avoide
>On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 04:38:02PM +, John Baldwin wrote:
>...
>> Submitted by: Andrzej Tobola ato at iem dot pw dot edu dot pl
>
>i understand that this is an attempt to prevent email harvesting,
>but don't you think that such programs will be smart enough
>to recognize sequences of 'foo
>Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The cost to check for free space is the cost of a fstatfs() system
>> call on the file descriptor of the log file. This should be handled
>> without touching the disk, so while it's not a cheap system call
>> compared to, say, getpid(), as it acqu
>From: Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Warner Losh writes:
>>
>> >> I've not been very impressed with what I've seen from sources using
>> >> this approach, but I guess having the prototypes with one line
>> >> comments is better than nothing.
>> >
>> >Doxygen d
>From: Tom Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> I think they should be moved to /usr/share/examples/etc/ (like
>> make.conf), with files in /etc/ representing good (short) defaults
>> with a minimum of comments and probably references to examples.
>> Like no /etc/hosts.allow file at all:
>>
>> """
>> A
Garance A Drosehn wrote:
>
> I think you misunderstand the goal. This is meant to benefit every
> single user who *updates* FreeBSD. That is a much larger audience
> than committers. This split has nothing to do with merging changes
> into the FreeBSD source repository.
>
> The merge we are ta
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Quoting Christian Brueffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> I don't agree to these changes, see below for details (also I don't see where
>> exactly you removed second person usage, it's still being used in the new
>> version).
>
>We want to aviod to use words like "you", "your"
babkin 2006-06-25 18:37:45 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
sys/amd64/conf GENERIC
sys/conf NOTES options
sys/i386/confGENERIC
sys/ia64/confGENERIC
sys/kern vfs_subr.c
sys/pc98/confGENERIC
s
babkin 2006-06-26 22:03:22 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
sys/amd64/conf GENERIC
sys/conf NOTES options
sys/i386/confGENERIC
sys/ia64/confGENERIC
sys/kern vfs_subr.c
sys/pc98/confGENERIC
s
Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Sergey Babkin wrote:
>
> > The common UID/GID space implementation. It has been discussed on -arch
> > in 1999, and there are changes to the sysctl names compared to PR,
> > according to that discussion. The descr
13 matches
Mail list logo
