On 17.12.2010 16:15, Doug Barton wrote:
In no particular order, new rc.d scripts should not be added with the
.sh extension. I've attached a patch to the current version, but when
the final result is committed it should be minidlna.in.
Thanks for the diff, Doug. Regarding the .sh extension, ther
On 22.02.2011 11:54, Erwin Lansing wrote:
Just reinstating it to PORTREVISON+1 should be good enough. There's no
need to get the, few, people that may have upgraded during the time to
upgrade again to +2. PKGVERSION needs to be the same or higher, it just
cannot go down.
Since the package remai
On 22.02.2011 11:08, Greg Larkin wrote:
What's the proper fix at this point - rebump to current PORTREVISION+2,
or is a PORTEPOCH bump required?
Since the pointyhat had not started then, I don't think, there is
anything to be fixed at all now...
-mi
On 14.12.2010 02:27, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 06:11:04AM +, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
mi 2010-12-14 06:11:04 UTC
Added files:
net/minidlna Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist
net/minidlna/files BSDmakefile config.h getifaddr.c
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 09:34:05PM -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
Rong-en Fan wrote:
On 3/15/07, Colin Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Modified files:
usr.bin/tar write.c
Log:
Don't consider an lstat(2) failure to be an error (in the sen