Re: truss status (was: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/lmc if_lmc.h)

2006-07-24 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Robert Watson píše v po 24. 07. 2006 v 13:10 +0100: > (3) truss is believed not to work properly with threaded applications. ktrace > has been extended to know about thread IDs, and has always been able to > generate traces properly for threaded apps, whereas truss likely doesn't >

Re: truss status (was: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/lmc if_lmc.h)

2006-07-24 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday 24 July 2006 08:10, Robert Watson wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > > > On Friday, 21 July 2006 at 13:29:38 +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote: > >> Tom Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> Wait. I'm lost. Isn't truss(1) broken on FreeBSD? > >> > >> Depends on

Re: truss status (was: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/lmc if_lmc.h)

2006-07-24 Thread Robert Watson
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Friday, 21 July 2006 at 13:29:38 +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote: Tom Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Wait. I'm lost. Isn't truss(1) broken on FreeBSD? Depends on your definition of broken. It kind of works provided you have /proc mou

truss status (was: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/lmc if_lmc.h)

2006-07-23 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Friday, 21 July 2006 at 13:29:38 +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote: > Tom Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Wait. I'm lost. Isn't truss(1) broken on FreeBSD? > > Depends on your definition of broken. It kind of works provided you > have /proc mounted. Still, there's really not much point i