kientzle2008-07-05 05:17:33 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
usr.bin/cpio Makefile
Log:
SVN rev 180280 on 2008-07-05 05:17:33Z by kientzle
bsdcpio is now at version 1.0.0.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +1 -1 src/usr.bin/cpio/Makefile
_
dougb 2008-06-16 07:24:05 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
usr.bin/cpio Makefile
Log:
SVN rev 179816 on 2008-06-16 07:24:05Z by dougb
Include bsd.own.mk to pick up the definition of MK_GNU_CPIO
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +2 -0 src/usr
David O'Brien wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:16:39AM -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
I'm looking forward to when we can remove both GNU cpio and
our current pax implementation from the tree,
I don't see a reason to remove pax from the tree. It is already
BSDL'ed and is faster than libarchive
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 06:58 -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 09:27:12AM -0400, Coleman Kane wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 18:35 -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:16:39AM -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
> > > > I'm looking forward to when we can remove
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 09:27:12AM -0400, Coleman Kane wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 18:35 -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:16:39AM -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
> > > I'm looking forward to when we can remove both GNU cpio and our current
> > > pax implementation from the
On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 18:35 -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:16:39AM -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
> > I'm looking forward to when we can remove both GNU cpio and our current
> > pax implementation from the tree,
>
> I don't see a reason to remove pax from the tree. It is a
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:16:39AM -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
> I'm looking forward to when we can remove both GNU cpio and our current
> pax implementation from the tree,
I don't see a reason to remove pax from the tree. It is already BSDL'ed
and is faster than libarchive based archivers. Ple
