anything* because pkg-desc changed?
> >> It's about the question - do you care what's on ftp mirrors?
> >> If you don't care, you don't raise PORTREVISION.
> >>
> >>> end of "Re: cvs commit: ports/shells/bash Makefile pkg-plist"
are what's on ftp mirrors?
>> If you don't care, you don't raise PORTREVISION.
>>
>>> end of "Re: cvs commit: ports/shells/bash Makefile pkg-plist" from Pav
>>> Lucistnik <<
>
> Just saying, why not have a line in the commit message
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 09:02:00AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 06:18:49PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> > Ew, I don't like that at all. Why should I rebuild (say) bash just
> > because someone fixes a typo in the description? The port is already
> > installed, a
At 9:02 AM -0700 3/30/09, David O'Brien wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> Ew, I don't like that at all. Why should I rebuild (say) bash just
because someone fixes a typo in the description? The port is already
installed, and I have no intention of reading the descripti
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 06:18:49PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> Ew, I don't like that at all. Why should I rebuild (say) bash just
> because someone fixes a typo in the description? The port is already
> installed, and I have no intention of reading the description until
> *maybe* the next t
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Setting FORCE_MAKE_JOBS would be another example which should not
> trigger a rebuild for the user.
Ahem, MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes.
Gerald
___
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, David O'Brien wrote:
>>> Is there ever a change then that doesn't require a bump in either
>>> PORTREVISION or PORTVERSION?
>> Just changing the maintainer should not require the user to do anything.
> That is the only case I can think of. Even changing the comment or
> pkg-de
mirrors?
If you don't care, you don't raise PORTREVISION.
end of "Re: cvs commit: ports/shells/bash Makefile pkg-plist" from Pav Lucistnik
<<
Just saying, why not have a line in the commit message that triggers a
rebuild without bumping the PORTREVISION.
Pac
rs?
> If you don't care, you don't raise PORTREVISION.
>
>> end of "Re: cvs commit: ports/shells/bash Makefile pkg-plist" from Pav
>> Lucistnik <<
Just saying, why not have a line in the commit message that triggers a
rebuild without bumping the PORTREV
Garance A Drosihn píše v čt 26. 03. 2009 v 14:40 -0400:
> Well, still, why rebuild *anything* because pkg-desc changed?
It's about the question - do you care what's on ftp mirrors?
If you don't care, you don't raise PORTREVISION.
--
Pav Lucistnik
A mouse is a device used to poin
At 9:37 AM +0100 3/26/09, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Garance A Drosihn píe v st 25. 03. 2009 v 18:18 -0400:
>That is the only case I can think of. Even changing the comment or
>pkg-descr should have its PORTREVISION bumped in order to get a new
>package built so users have the fresh description.
Garance A Drosihn píše v st 25. 03. 2009 v 18:18 -0400:
> >That is the only case I can think of. Even changing the comment or
> >pkg-descr should have its PORTREVISION bumped in order to get a new
> >package built so users have the fresh description.
>
> Ew, I don't like that at all. Why should
I've had this idea for a while now... feel free to shoot it down in flames.
PORTVERSION=1.0
PORTREVISION= 1
CHASEVERSION= 1.0 # this is my idea
Sets a version number that if you are upgrading from a version lesser
than this version, all dependent ports should be rebuilt as well. Minor
At 7:17 PM -0700 3/23/09, Doug Barton wrote:
David O'Brien wrote:
>
> If not, maybe we should do away with PORTREVISION and use
> something like:
>
${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}_${VCS_ID}
I actually have in mind a different scheme that replaces both
PORTREVISION and PORTEPOCH with a date str
At 9:30 PM -0700 3/23/09, David O'Brien wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 09:23:25PM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:14:13PM +, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:34:26PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > David O'Brien wrote:
> > >There is zero reason to
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 09:30:28PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 09:23:25PM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:14:13PM +, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:34:26PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > > > David O'Brien wrote:
> > >
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 09:23:25PM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:14:13PM +, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:34:26PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > > David O'Brien wrote:
> > > >There is zero reason to force a reinstall for a PLIST change.
> > > >
David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:34:26PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
>> David O'Brien wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:54:01AM +, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
osa 2009-03-12 09:54:01 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
shells/bash
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:14:13PM +, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:34:26PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > David O'Brien wrote:
> > >On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:54:01AM +, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
> > >>osa 2009-03-12 09:54:01 UTC
> > >> FreeBSD ports repository
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:34:26PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:54:01AM +, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
> >>osa 2009-03-12 09:54:01 UTC
> >> FreeBSD ports repository
> >> Modified files:
> >>shells/bash Makefile pkg-plist
>
Pav Lucistnik píše v pá 13. 03. 2009 v 17:39 +0100:
> BTW are you addressing that yacc-breakage? Looks like a blocker, broke
> some 20 ports in last run.
Taking this back, haven't noticed you already committed a fix. Thanks!
--
Pav Lucistnik
MIPS: Meaningless Information Provide
David O'Brien píše v pá 13. 03. 2009 v 08:56 -0700:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:34:26PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > David O'Brien wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:54:01AM +, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
> >>> osa 2009-03-12 09:54:01 UTC
> >>> FreeBSD ports repository
> >>> Mod
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:34:26PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:54:01AM +, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
>>> osa 2009-03-12 09:54:01 UTC
>>> FreeBSD ports repository
>>> Modified files:
>>> shells/bash Makefile pkg-plist L
David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:54:01AM +, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
osa 2009-03-12 09:54:01 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
shells/bash Makefile pkg-plist
Log:
Fix pkg-plist.
Bump PORTREVISION.
Thanks for fixing the PLIST (much a
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:39:56 -0700 David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:54:01AM +, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
> > osa 2009-03-12 09:54:01 UTC
> > FreeBSD ports repository
> > Modified files:
> > shells/bash Makefile pkg-plist
> > Log:
> > Fix pkg-plist.
>
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:54:01AM +, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
> osa 2009-03-12 09:54:01 UTC
> FreeBSD ports repository
> Modified files:
> shells/bash Makefile pkg-plist
> Log:
> Fix pkg-plist.
> Bump PORTREVISION.
Thanks for fixing the PLIST (much appreciated),
osa 2009-03-12 09:54:01 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
shells/bash Makefile pkg-plist
Log:
Fix pkg-plist.
Bump PORTREVISION.
Approved by:pav@ (portmgr)
Revision ChangesPath
1.110 +1 -1 ports/shells/bash/Makefile
1.25
pav 2007-06-25 23:37:34 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
shells/bash Makefile pkg-plist
Log:
- Fix plist
With hat: portmgr
Revision ChangesPath
1.95 +1 -0 ports/shells/bash/Makefile
1.21 +2 -1 ports/shells/bash
28 matches
Mail list logo
