On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 08:18:08AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> I presume this was triggered by the recent thread on -ports
> encouraging people to take ownership of unloved ports. Unfortunately,
> this (and the other FreeBSD compat ports) are exceptions where the
> general rule that "maintainer =
On Sat, 2006-Jun-03 12:18:47 -0300, Marcus Alves Grando wrote:
>Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
>> misc/compat5xMakefile pkg-descr
>> Log:
>> - Take maintainership
>
>Why? Many critical ports, maintainer is [EMAIL PROTECTED] And keep this are a
>good
>idea.
I presume this was triggered
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> sat 2006-06-03 13:55:52 UTC
>
> FreeBSD ports repository
>
> Modified files:
> misc/compat5xMakefile pkg-descr
> Log:
> - Take maintainership
> - Pet portlint(1)
>
> PR: ports/97965
> Submitted by: Rene Ladan <[EMAIL P
sat 2006-06-03 13:55:52 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
misc/compat5xMakefile pkg-descr
Log:
- Take maintainership
- Pet portlint(1)
PR: ports/97965
Submitted by: Rene Ladan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Revision ChangesPath
1.11
