On Fri, 30 May 2008, Ceri Davies wrote:
Thats something that the admin should take care for.
How might they do that? Remember that any command that works only when
the jail IP is "unambiguous" will become effectively non-deterministic as
a result of un-garbage collected jails. So
Is it
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Robert Watson wrote:
> > How might they do that? Remember that any command that works only
> > when the jail IP is "unambiguous" will become effectively
> > non-deterministic as a result of un-garbage collected jails. So
>
> Is it feasible to change the ho
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 04:50:51PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 29 May 2008 15:56:50
> +0100 (BST)):
>
>> On Thu, 29 May 2008, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 03:14:20PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: ...
Th
Quoting Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 29 May 2008
15:56:50 +0100 (BST)):
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 03:14:20PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: ...
The other concept that might be of benefit is a "dead" jail vs. a
"live" jail -- with
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
Log:
Fix some bugs/complaints:
- make addr2jid static
- add -h Flag for hostname/ip-number search
- s,strncmp,strcmp, in addr2jid
- return jid only if found once
Requested by: some
FWIW, I thin
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
Log:
Fix some bugs/complaints:
- make addr2jid static
- add -h Flag for hostname/ip-number search
- s,strncmp,strcmp, in addr2jid
- return jid only if found once
Requested by: some
FWIW, I think recent changes have made jexec behave in a
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 03:14:20PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: ...
The other concept that might be of benefit is a "dead" jail vs. a "live"
jail -- with TCP connections taking a while to run down, there can often be
dangling jail references that
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 03:14:20PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
...
> The other concept that might be of benefit is a "dead" jail vs. a "live"
> jail -- with TCP connections taking a while to run down, there can often be
> dangling jail references that don't garbage collect for a few minutes.
> P
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 04:16:49PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 May 2008, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > I think that an admin who decides to use jexec with IP
> > > numbers or hostnames should be expected to be aware that
> > > there can be ambiguities, and th
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Thu, 29 May 2008, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > I think that an admin who decides to use jexec with IP
> > numbers or hostnames should be expected to be aware that
> > there can be ambiguities, and that he should make sure
> > that his IP numbers and/or hostnames are uni
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 01:09:49PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: ...
Maybe make it only work if it only matches a single jail? That would work
for the common case while avoiding ambiguities in the complex cases.
Yes. Thats a good suggestion and
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 01:09:49PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
...
>
> Maybe make it only work if it only matches a single jail? That would work
> for
> the common case while avoiding ambiguities in the complex cases.
>
Yes.
Thats a good suggestion and the road I'll go.
Thanks!
--
Bye/2
---
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:57:49AM +, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> > mr 2008-05-26 11:57:49 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD src repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > usr.sbin/jexec jexec.8 jexec.c
> > Log:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:57:49AM +, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> > mr 2008-05-26 11:57:49 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD src repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > usr.sbin/jexec jexec.8 jexec.c
> > Log:
> > Extend jexec to accept hos
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:57:49AM +, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> mr 2008-05-26 11:57:49 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> usr.sbin/jexec jexec.8 jexec.c
> Log:
> Extend jexec to accept hostname or ip-number besides jail-id.
As many already su
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 01:09:49PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday 26 May 2008 10:07:35 am Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> > On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 02:49:16PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
> > > On Mon, 26 May 2008, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> > >
> > > > Extend jexec to accept hostname or i
On Monday 26 May 2008 10:07:35 am Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 02:49:16PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 May 2008, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> >
> > > Extend jexec to accept hostname or ip-number besides jail-id.
> >
> > It might be worth adding a caution in
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Frank Behrens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Mon, 26 May 2008
20:48:23 +0200):
The rc.conf jail framework also requires unique hostnames for jails,
because the jail-ids are
write to /var/run.
On a related note: JIDs are not known in advance, so doing some rc.d
18 matches
Mail list logo
