Ivan Voras wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:35:10AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>>> It might be a good idea to drop msdosfs off of this list. Real physical
>>> filesystems in Windoze world are typically NTFS now, and FAT is used
>>> mainly in removable storage.
>> Not
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Stefan Esser wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071016 15:59] wrote:
While userland can tell if a filesystem is pseudo or not, (see lsvfs), I'm
not sure that we can reliably tell whether a device is removable or not
(cf. my camera, USB key,
David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:35:10AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>> It might be a good idea to drop msdosfs off of this list. Real physical
>> filesystems in Windoze world are typically NTFS now, and FAT is used
>> mainly in removable storage.
>
> Not nessisarly - vfat/fat
At 6:15 PM +0200 10/17/07, Stefan Esser wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071016 15:59] wrote:
While userland can tell if a filesystem is pseudo or not, (see lsvfs),
I'm not sure that we can reliably tell whether a device is removable or
not (cf. my camera, U
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:35:10AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> It might be a good idea to drop msdosfs off of this list. Real physical
> filesystems in Windoze world are typically NTFS now, and FAT is used
> mainly in removable storage.
Not nessisarly - vfat/fat32 is the only reliable FS tha
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071016 15:59] wrote:
>> While userland can tell if a filesystem is pseudo or not, (see lsvfs),
>> I'm not sure that we can reliably tell whether a device is removable or
>> not (cf. my camera, USB key, iPod, etc.).
>
> fstab(5) gives som
* Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071017 05:33] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > While userland can tell if a filesystem is pseudo or not, (see
> > > lsvfs), I'm not sure that we can reliably tell whether a device is
>
Circa Oct 17 2007, Stefan Esser wrote:
> Yes, I considered this. In fact, if there is consensus that FAT should
> be excluded, I'd add another category to the configuration parameters
> of the locate.updatedb script. Currently there is:
>
> $SEARCHPATHS(start points for the directory sca
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > While userland can tell if a filesystem is pseudo or not, (see
> > lsvfs), I'm not sure that we can reliably tell whether a device is
> > removable or not (cf. my camera, USB key, iPod, etc.).
> fstab(5) give
* Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [071016 15:59] wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 07:10:03PM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote:
> > Ceri Davies schrieb:
> > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:09:19PM +, Stefan Esser wrote:
> > >> se 2007-10-15 22:09:19 UTC
> > >>
> > >> FreeBSD src repository
> >
Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 07:10:03PM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote:
>> The second possibility is to extend the list in the update script. It
>> needs to contain at least:
>>
>> ufs ext2fs zfs
>>
>> and probably also:
>>
>> xfs msdosfs ntfs ntfs-3g (?)
>
> It might be
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 07:10:03PM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote:
> Ceri Davies schrieb:
> > On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:09:19PM +, Stefan Esser wrote:
> >> se 2007-10-15 22:09:19 UTC
> >>
> >> FreeBSD src repository
> >>
> >> Modified files:
> >> usr.bin/locate/locate updatedb.sh
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 07:10:03PM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote:
> Ceri Davies schrieb:
> > On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:09:19PM +, Stefan Esser wrote:
> >> se 2007-10-15 22:09:19 UTC
> >>
> >> FreeBSD src repository
> >>
> >> Modified files:
> >> usr.bin/locate/locate updatedb.sh
Ceri Davies schrieb:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:09:19PM +, Stefan Esser wrote:
>> se 2007-10-15 22:09:19 UTC
>>
>> FreeBSD src repository
>>
>> Modified files:
>> usr.bin/locate/locate updatedb.sh
>> Log:
>> Make the updatedb script installed as /usr/libexec/locate.updat
Christian S.J. Peron schrieb:
> You should claim ownership over PR: 116960 and change it to patched
> since the reporter was complaining about this issue.
Thanks for the information, I'll take care of it ...
I had sent a request for approval of the patch to the release engineer
a few hours before
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:09:19PM +, Stefan Esser wrote:
> se 2007-10-15 22:09:19 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> usr.bin/locate/locate updatedb.sh
> Log:
> Make the updatedb script installed as /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb
> inspect all local fil
You should claim ownership over PR: 116960 and change it to patched
since the reporter was complaining about this issue.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:09:19PM +, Stefan Esser wrote:
> se 2007-10-15 22:09:19 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> usr.bin/locate/loc
17 matches
Mail list logo
