On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 02:44:43AM +0600, Max Khon wrote:
> Ho!
>
> Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>
> >>>John Birrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Log:
> Fix strict alias warnings.
> >>>A much simpler solution (relative to the previous revision):
> >>>
> >>>@@ -131,10 +131,10 @@
> >>>
On Tuesday 04 December 2007 04:08:21 pm M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> : > On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 04:57:33PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> : > > On Monday 03 Decem
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Max Laier wrote:
On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 04:57:33PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday 03 December 2007 10:24:52 am Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
John Birrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Log:
Fix strict alias warnin
Ho!
Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
John Birrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Log:
Fix strict alias warnings.
A much simpler solution (relative to the previous revision):
@@ -131,10 +131,10 @@
sum += oddbyte;
}
/* "Pseudo-header" data */
- ptr = (u_short *) & (pip->
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
: > On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 04:57:33PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
: > > On Monday 03 December 2007 10:24:52 am Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
: > > > John Birrell <[
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 05:25:35PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
*ptr++ would choke since pointer arith on (void *) is undefined AFAIK.
I've been under impression that ++ on void * whould simply increase it
by one.
This behaviour is documented for GCC:
http://www.mcs.vuw
Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 05:25:35PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > *ptr++ would choke since pointer arith on (void *) is undefined AFAIK.
>
> I've been under impression that ++ on void * whould simply increase it
> by one.
This behaviour is documented for GCC:
http://www.mcs.vuw.ac.nz/cgi-bin/inf
On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 04:57:33PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Monday 03 December 2007 10:24:52 am Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> > > John Birrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Log:
> > > > Fix strict alias warnings.
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 04:57:33PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday 03 December 2007 10:24:52 am Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> > John Birrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Log:
> > > Fix strict alias warnings.
> >
> > A much simpler solution (relative to the previous revision):
> >
On Monday 03 December 2007 10:24:52 am Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> John Birrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Log:
> > Fix strict alias warnings.
>
> A much simpler solution (relative to the previous revision):
>
> @@ -131,10 +131,10 @@
> sum += oddbyte;
> }
> /* "
John Birrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Log:
> Fix strict alias warnings.
A much simpler solution (relative to the previous revision):
@@ -131,10 +131,10 @@
sum += oddbyte;
}
/* "Pseudo-header" data */
- ptr = (u_short *) & (pip->ip_dst);
+ ptr = (void
11 matches
Mail list logo