Benno Rice пишет:
benno 2008-02-01 07:17:26 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
sys/netgraph ng_pppoe.c
Log:
Band-aid recent commit by mav by replacing a variable in a CTR statement with
the variable that appears as if it should've been there.
Thanks and s
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:42:29AM +0100, Joao Barros wrote:
J> > FreeBSD src repository
J> >
J> > Modified files:
J> >sys/netgraph ng_pppoe.c
J> > Log:
J> > - Use log(9) instead of printf(9).
J> > - Print node ID, where possible.
J> > - Prepend log messages with function name, or
On 8/7/06, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
glebius 2006-08-07 08:05:10 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
sys/netgraph ng_pppoe.c
Log:
- Use log(9) instead of printf(9).
- Print node ID, where possible.
- Prepend log messages with function name, or a
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 08:58:18PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
B> >The other change I'm planning to do is the following - if the
B> >original PADI had empty Service-Name, and we are servicing a
B> >specific Service-Name, then return remove empty one from PADO,
B> >returning only our specific Servi
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Hi,
some brain-dump...
The other change I'm planning to do is the following - if the
original PADI had empty Service-Name, and we are servicing a
specific Service-Name, then return remove empty one from PADO,
returning only our
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Hi,
some brain-dump...
The other change I'm planning to do is the following - if the
original PADI had empty Service-Name, and we are servicing a
specific Service-Name, then return remove empty one from PADO,
returning only our specific Service-Name.
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 11:49:08AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
J> try not to change the behaviour of the LMI and PPPoE modules too much.
J> the modules as they were, were certified by MCI as being complient with
J> their
J> PPPoE requirements.
J> Some of the required beh
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 11:49:08AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
J> try not to change the behaviour of the LMI and PPPoE modules too much.
J> the modules as they were, were certified by MCI as being complient with
J> their
J> PPPoE requirements.
J> Some of the required behaviours were odd to me be
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
try not to change the behaviour of the LMI and PPPoE modules too much.
the modules as they were, were certified by MCI as being complient with
their
PPPoE requirements.
Some of the required behaviours were odd to me becasue they were not
specified by the spec.
(e.g. this
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 01:06:50PM +, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
T> This change makes FreeBSD AC compatible with D-Link DI-614+ and
T> D-Link DI-624+ SOHO routers, and probably others.
... but don't hurry to buy them. The PPPoE part is compatible now
with HEAD, and I think will be compatible wit
10 matches
Mail list logo
