On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:59:32PM -0500, Louis Mamakos wrote:
L> I suppose the problem is that I had no expectation that a kernel module,
L> would
L> consume unbounded amounts of kernel resources.
It is bounded.
L> I certainly didn't expect
L> that
L> it would have a need to store "a lot
On Feb 5, 2008, at 9:17 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 11:36:49AM -0500, Louis Mamakos wrote:
L> > Gleb Smirnoff пишет:
L> >> you should have asked me for review before committing! This is
L> >> not a bug, this is a feature. This was quite clear from the
comments,
L> >> th
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 11:36:49AM -0500, Louis Mamakos wrote:
L> > Gleb Smirnoff пишет:
L> >> you should have asked me for review before committing! This is
L> >> not a bug, this is a feature. This was quite clear from the comments,
L> >> that you removed:
L> >> - /* if export hook disconne
On Feb 2, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
Gleb Smirnoff пишет:
you should have asked me for review before committing! This is
not a bug, this is a feature. This was quite clear from the comments,
that you removed:
- /* if export hook disconnected stop running expire(). */
This
Gleb Smirnoff пишет:
you should have asked me for review before committing! This is
not a bug, this is a feature. This was quite clear from the comments,
that you removed:
- /* if export hook disconnected stop running expire(). */
This is intended behavior. We must not lose informatio
Alexander,
you should have asked me for review before committing! This is
not a bug, this is a feature. This was quite clear from the comments,
that you removed:
- /* if export hook disconnected stop running expire(). */
This is intended behavior. We must not lose information unless
