On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Is there any chance to get bind back w/o threading support? I guess
the question is more to Doug than to you.
My perspective on this is that the BIND in the base should have a solid
default configuration that fits the needs of the majority of our use
On Fri, 12.10.2007 at 08:27:47 +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> Is there any chance to get bind back w/o threading support? I guess
> the question is more to Doug than to you.
>
> I found it usefull especially for (CF) installations where I
> neither needed pppctl nor any other thing that depended o
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there any chance to get bind back w/o threading support? I guess
> the question is more to Doug than to you.
>
> I found it usefull especially for (CF) installations where I
> neither needed pppctl nor any other thing that depended on a threading
>
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
Hi,
ru 2007-10-12 08:03:51 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
share/mk bsd.own.mk
Log:
Though it was possible to configure our BIND to build even when
libpthread support isn't present, our maintainer felt it's an
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 04:39:42AM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> phk 2006-03-19 04:39:42 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> share/mk bsd.own.mk
> Log:
> Add default for MK_PROFILE
>
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.46 +1 -0 sr
