On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 11:16:00AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 12:06 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 06:29:13AM +, Ken Smith wrote:
> > > kensmith2007-12-22 06:29:13 UTC
> > >
> > > FreeBSD src repository
> > >
> > > Modified files:
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 12:06 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 06:29:13AM +, Ken Smith wrote:
> > kensmith2007-12-22 06:29:13 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD src repository
> >
> > Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_7)
> > release Makefile
> > Log:
>
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 06:29:13AM +, Ken Smith wrote:
> kensmith2007-12-22 06:29:13 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_7)
> release Makefile
> Log:
> MFC v1.887.2.22:
>
> > Add support for disc3. Depending on architec
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 06:42:12PM +0100, Max Laier wrote:
> On Sunday 09 December 2007, David E. O'Brien wrote:
> > obrien 2007-12-09 04:24:09 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD src repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > release Makefile
> > Log:
> > Make it easier to experiment wit
On Sunday 09 December 2007, David E. O'Brien wrote:
> obrien 2007-12-09 04:24:09 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> release Makefile
> Log:
> Make it easier to experiment with alternate compression.
>
> Reviewed by:kensmith
>
> Revision Chang
On Nov 17, 2007 3:26 AM, John Birrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 09:00:50PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
> > - Yes, people have asked about doing DVDs instead but
> > I haven't had time and nobody else progressed past the
> > question phase. :-) If nobod
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 09:00:50PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
> - Yes, people have asked about doing DVDs instead but
> I haven't had time and nobody else progressed past the
> question phase. :-) If nobody else does I'll start
> screwing around with it in HEAD after th
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 22:04 +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 01:14:27PM +, Ken Smith wrote:
> > kensmith2007-11-16 13:14:27 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD src repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > release Makefile
> > Log:
> > The i386 disc1 size w
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 01:14:27PM +, Ken Smith wrote:
> kensmith2007-11-16 13:14:27 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> release Makefile
> Log:
> The i386 disc1 size wandered above what fits on 650Mb media which has been
> our target previousl
On 2007.11.16 13:14:27 +, Ken Smith wrote:
> kensmith2007-11-16 13:14:27 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> release Makefile
> Log:
> The i386 disc1 size wandered above what fits on 650Mb media which has been
> our target previously. So i386
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 07:54:37PM +, Ruslan Ermilov wrote..
ru 2006-09-08 19:54:37 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
release Makefile
release/scripts kernels-install.sh
Log:
Stop cutting the tarball names to eight symbol
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 07:54:37PM +, Ruslan Ermilov wrote..
> ru 2006-09-08 19:54:37 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> release Makefile
> release/scripts kernels-install.sh
> Log:
> Stop cutting the tarball names to eight symbol
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm, I wonder why do we need two copies of cdboot in the tree.
> sys/i386/boot/cdboot
> vs
> sys/boot/i386/cdboot
>
> It doesn't look right to me.
It's my fault. I already fixed.
---
TAKAHASHI Yoshihiro <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hmm, I wonder why do we need two copies of cdboot in the tree.
sys/i386/boot/cdboot
vs
sys/boot/i386/cdboot
It doesn't look right to me.
-Maxim
Takahashi Yoshihiro wrote:
nyan2006-06-16 13:14:15 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
release
Colin Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Log:
> When deleting empty directories prior to building the release tarballs,
> pass the "-empty" flag to find(1). This change has no effect other
> than to get rid of a few pages of "rmdir: ...: Directory not empty"
> error messages. (Note
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
: > This talk of KERNELS reminds me of a patchset I've had for quite a
: > while.
: >
: > Currently, 'make buildkernel' builds all the kernels you list in
: > KERNCONF, but installs only
On Fri, 2006-Mar-10 16:34:03 +0100, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
>I'd have to learn Forth first. Can you recommend a good (and short)
>primer?
If you are used to RPN (eg HP calculators), this isn't too difficult.
"Starting Forth" is probably the best, but (AFAIK) it's out of print.
(Though the foll
Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dan Sobral and I have talked about exactly this in the past. What you
> want to do is merge libregex into the loader and add the calling shims
> so that it can be accessd as 4th words. [...]
I'd have to learn Forth first. Can you recommend a good (and sh
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
This talk of KERNELS reminds me of a patchset I've had for quite a
while.
Currently, 'make buildkernel' builds all the kernels you list in
KERNCONF, but installs only one, to /boot/kernel. I've patched my
tree so it installs all of them into /boot/${KERN_IDENT}. The
This talk of KERNELS reminds me of a patchset I've had for quite a
while.
Currently, 'make buildkernel' builds all the kernels you list in
KERNCONF, but installs only one, to /boot/kernel. I've patched my
tree so it installs all of them into /boot/${KERN_IDENT}. The reason
why I haven't committe
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
ru 2006-03-09 17:55:08 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
release Makefile
Log:
Fix this to what I've actually submitted.
Revision ChangesPath
1.902 +1 -1 src/release/Makefile
http://cvsweb.FreeBSD.org/src/r
On Thursday 09 March 2006 13:35, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday 09 March 2006 12:11, Sam Leffler wrote:
> > sam 2006-03-09 17:11:18 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD src repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > release Makefile
> > Log:
> > handle KERNELS as before
> >
> >
On Thursday 09 March 2006 12:11, Sam Leffler wrote:
> sam 2006-03-09 17:11:18 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> release Makefile
> Log:
> handle KERNELS as before
>
> Submitted by: ru, andrew
Does this actually work though? I thought i
Sam Leffler wrote:
Log:
Revamp base system packaging of kernels to enable up/smp selection
at runtime and to support distributing additional kernels:
o remove kernel from the base tarball
o add new kernel tarballs
o build + package both SMP and GENERIC kernels when an /conf/SMP
co
Sewas Sam,
Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 7:02:32 PM, you wrote:
> Log:
> Revamp base system packaging of kernels to enable up/smp selection
> at runtime and to support distributing additional kernels:
> o remove kernel from the base tarball
> o add new kernel tarballs
> o build + package
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:03:05PM -0500, Tom Rhodes wrote:
> We need a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
And we Won't Invite You.
Mark "old farts rule!" Linimon
___
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To uns
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 14:38:40 -0800 (PST)
Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> > On 2 Feb, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> >
> >> Better: I still *have* an LSI-11/23 with 8" SMD. And a 11/73 with SCSI.
> >
> > Cool! I did some of the processor design
On 2 Feb, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> On 2 Feb, Wilko Bulte wrote:
>>
>>> Better: I still *have* an LSI-11/23 with 8" SMD. And a 11/73 with SCSI.
>>
>> Cool! I did some of the processor design and debug work on the J11
>> processor used in the 11/
On 2 Feb, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> Better: I still *have* an LSI-11/23 with 8" SMD. And a 11/73 with SCSI.
Cool! I did some of the processor design and debug work on the J11
processor used in the 11/73.
___
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://list
Matthew Jacob wrote:
Yeah!
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:05:16PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote..
I forgot- the world premier PDP-11 site is in .nl.
Is it? Which one do you mean?
http://www.pdp-11.nl/
Ah.
I am sure you will also appreciate Ge
Yeah!
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:05:16PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote..
I forgot- the world premier PDP-11 site is in .nl.
Is it? Which one do you mean?
http://www.pdp-11.nl/
Ah.
I am sure you will also appreciate Geert's museum at:
http://ww
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 01:05:16PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote..
>
>
> >>
> >>I forgot- the world premier PDP-11 site is in .nl.
> >
> >Is it? Which one do you mean?
>
> http://www.pdp-11.nl/
Ah.
I am sure you will also appreciate Geert's museum at:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~geerol/
Geert is a f
I forgot- the world premier PDP-11 site is in .nl.
Is it? Which one do you mean?
http://www.pdp-11.nl/
___
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:32:16AM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote..
>
>
> >>
> >>I ran an LSI-11/23 with 8" fujitsu SMD drives that had 256KB of memory.
> >
> >Better: I still *have* an LSI-11/23 with 8" SMD. And a 11/73 with SCSI.
>
> Got me there. I dumped mine back in '92.
>
> I forgot- the wo
I ran an LSI-11/23 with 8" fujitsu SMD drives that had 256KB of memory.
Better: I still *have* an LSI-11/23 with 8" SMD. And a 11/73 with SCSI.
Got me there. I dumped mine back in '92.
I forgot- the world premier PDP-11 site is in .nl.
___
c
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:49:58AM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote..
> >>Or SCO V.old I always installed my SVR3.2 using a bootfloppy and then
> >>loaded the rest from 45MB QIC tapes :)
> >
> >I used to have a really old copy of SCO Xenix which worked surprisingly
> >well on machines with only 1Mb of
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Matthew Jacob wrote:
MJ>> > Or SCO V.old I always installed my SVR3.2 using a bootfloppy and then
MJ>> > loaded the rest from 45MB QIC tapes :)
MJ>>
MJ>> I used to have a really old copy of SCO Xenix which worked surprisingly
MJ>> well on machines with only 1Mb of memory. I s
Or SCO V.old I always installed my SVR3.2 using a bootfloppy and then
loaded the rest from 45MB QIC tapes :)
I used to have a really old copy of SCO Xenix which worked surprisingly well
on machines with only 1Mb of memory. I seem to remember that I had to quit
out of emacs before compiling an
On 31 Jan 2006, at 19:29, Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:27:30PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote..
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 08:25:45PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
Reminds me of Slackware version 0.0 or somesuch :) Or 386BSD 0.1
+ PK
for that matter :)))
I believe AT&T SysVR3 was 14
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Sergey Babkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
A 30MB image gets loaded from CD in no time, but loading it from an
USB flash drive took almost forever, easily half an hour or
so. Maybe the BIOSes became more clever since then.
It should not take more than ~30 seconds, e
Sergey Babkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A 30MB image gets loaded from CD in no time, but loading it from an
> USB flash drive took almost forever, easily half an hour or
> so. Maybe the BIOSes became more clever since then.
It should not take more than ~30 seconds, even with USB 1.x. If it
ta
>From: =?ISO646-US?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=3Frgrav?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sergey Babkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 1. It's slow, since BIOSes tend to use USB 1.x speeds, and even that
>> not in a really fast way. So the big images are best to be
>> avoided. Though probably it's still faster than flopp
Sergey Babkin wrote:
From: Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Some time ago, I was surprised to find that my son's oldish (mid 2003)
system was happy to try and boot off a USB memory stick.
The BIOSes have been able to do this feat for a while now. There are two
caveats though:
1. It's sl
Sergey Babkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. It's slow, since BIOSes tend to use USB 1.x speeds, and even that
> not in a really fast way. So the big images are best to be
> avoided. Though probably it's still faster than floppies.
It is significantly faster than a floppy, and comparable to a CD
Sergey Babkin skrev:
From: Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Some time ago, I was surprised to find that my son's oldish (mid 2003)
system was happy to try and boot off a USB memory stick.
The BIOSes have been able to do this feat for a while now. There are two
caveats though:
1. It's slow,
>From: Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Some time ago, I was surprised to find that my son's oldish (mid 2003)
>system was happy to try and boot off a USB memory stick.
The BIOSes have been able to do this feat for a while now. There are two
caveats though:
1. It's slow, since BIOSes tend to u
On Tue, 2006-Jan-31 13:39:33 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
>Note: this amounts to life support for floppies. The end IS coming. What
>we need is for people to start working out the kinks of using usb ram
>drives to run the installer. This isn't the same as running nanobsd or
>picobsd, this is abou
* Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Date: 2006-01-31 ]
[ w.r.t. Re: cvs commit: src/release Makefile ]
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 05:42:23PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote..
> > On Tue, 2006-Jan-31 23:31:05 +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > >On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 08:52:30A
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 05:42:23PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote..
> On Tue, 2006-Jan-31 23:31:05 +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 08:52:30AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote..
> >> On Wednesday 01 February 2006 07:45, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> >> > > I did when I first built them. :)
> >> >
On Tue, 2006-Jan-31 23:31:05 +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 08:52:30AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote..
>> On Wednesday 01 February 2006 07:45, Wilko Bulte wrote:
>> > > I did when I first built them. :)
>> >
>> > So did I when you first built them. And I probably even tried the
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 09:01, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 08:52:30AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote..
>
> > On Wednesday 01 February 2006 07:45, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > > > I did when I first built them. :)
> > >
> > > So did I when you first built them. And I probably even tr
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 08:52:30AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote..
> On Wednesday 01 February 2006 07:45, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > > I did when I first built them. :)
> >
> > So did I when you first built them. And I probably even tried the next
> > release built after that. BUt later ones... /me to
Scott Long wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 02:13:07PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote..
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 09:30 -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 14:24 +, Ken Smith wrote:
kensmith2006-01-30 14:24:31 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
M
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 07:45, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > I did when I first built them. :)
>
> So did I when you first built them. And I probably even tried the next
> release built after that. BUt later ones... /me too lazy :-P
If you're just testing booting then using qemu works pretty well
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Jordan K. Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: On Jan 31, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Scott Long wrote:
:
: > Note: this amounts to life support for floppies. The end IS coming.
:
: Say it ain't so! If you establish a dangerous trend like this in
: yo
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:29:33PM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote..
>
> On Jan 31, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Scott Long wrote:
>
> >Note: this amounts to life support for floppies. The end IS coming.
>
> Say it ain't so! If you establish a dangerous trend like this in
> your support for floppy boo
On Jan 31, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Scott Long wrote:
Note: this amounts to life support for floppies. The end IS coming.
Say it ain't so! If you establish a dangerous trend like this in
your support for floppy booting, the next thing you know, some
computer manufacturer will start shipping
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 03:48:04PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote..
> On Tuesday 31 January 2006 15:37, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:45:17PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote..
> >
> > > On Monday 30 January 2006 11:15, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 09:30:02AM -0500, Ke
On Tuesday 31 January 2006 15:37, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:45:17PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote..
>
> > On Monday 30 January 2006 11:15, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 09:30:02AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote..
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 14:24 +, Ken Smit
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 02:13:07PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote..
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 09:30 -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 14:24 +, Ken Smith wrote:
kensmith2006-01-30 14:24:31 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
rele
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:45:17PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote..
> On Monday 30 January 2006 11:15, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 09:30:02AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote..
> >
> > > On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 14:24 +, Ken Smith wrote:
> > > > kensmith2006-01-30 14:24:31 UTC
> > > >
> >
On Monday 30 January 2006 11:15, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 09:30:02AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote..
>
> > On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 14:24 +, Ken Smith wrote:
> > > kensmith2006-01-30 14:24:31 UTC
> > >
> > > FreeBSD src repository
> > >
> > > Modified files:
> > > release
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:27:30PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote..
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 08:25:45PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > Reminds me of Slackware version 0.0 or somesuch :) Or 386BSD 0.1 + PK
> > for that matter :)))
>
> I believe AT&T SysVR3 was 14. I can go upstairs and check :-)
Or S
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 08:25:45PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> Reminds me of Slackware version 0.0 or somesuch :) Or 386BSD 0.1 + PK
> for that matter :)))
I believe AT&T SysVR3 was 14. I can go upstairs and check :-)
mcl
___
cvs-all@freebsd.org maili
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 02:13:07PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote..
> On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 09:30 -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 14:24 +, Ken Smith wrote:
> > > kensmith2006-01-30 14:24:31 UTC
> > >
> > > FreeBSD src repository
> > >
> > > Modified files:
> > > release
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 09:30 -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 14:24 +, Ken Smith wrote:
> > kensmith2006-01-30 14:24:31 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD src repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > release Makefile
> > Log:
> > Enable splitting up the MFSROOT flop
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 09:30:02AM -0500, Ken Smith wrote..
> On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 14:24 +, Ken Smith wrote:
> > kensmith2006-01-30 14:24:31 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD src repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > release Makefile
> > Log:
> > Enable splitting up the MFSR
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 14:24 +, Ken Smith wrote:
> kensmith2006-01-30 14:24:31 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> release Makefile
> Log:
> Enable splitting up the MFSROOT floppy on amd64, the contents now overflow
> one floppy's worth of space
68 matches
Mail list logo
