Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Doug,
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 08:58:25AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> No one is suggesting removing rc.local, and I would vigorously oppose doing
>> so.
>>
>> As I said in my last message, if users respond to the deprecation warning
>
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 10:25:49PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Doug,
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 08:58:25AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > No one is suggesting removing rc.local, and I would vigorously oppose
> > doing
> > so.
> >
> > As I said in my last mes
Doug,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 08:58:25AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> No one is suggesting removing rc.local, and I would vigorously oppose doing
> so.
>
> As I said in my last message, if users respond to the deprecation warning
> with a request not to remove it,
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 06:04:41AM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Doug Barton writes
:
If you truly want to run something literally before everything else, we'd
have to create something new, which perhaps is what yo
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 06:04:41AM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Doug Barton writes
:
If you truly want to run something literally before everything else, we'd
have to create something new, which perhaps is what yo
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 06:04:41AM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Doug Barton writes
> :
>
> >If you truly want to run something literally before everything else, we'd
> >have to create something new, which perhaps is what you were getting at
> >above. Before w
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 06:04:41AM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> I originally added /etc/rc.early to have a way to do things that
> needed to happen before fsck, such as arming watchdogs, tweaking
> drive parameters or get crypto key material necessary for filesystem
> access.
>
> None of thes
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Doug Barton writes
:
>If you truly want to run something literally before everything else, we'd
>have to create something new, which perhaps is what you were getting at
>above. Before we add such a thing though, I'd like to get an idea of why
>it would be needed.
>
> >This is precisely why we have rc.early and rc.local: so people who have
> >special (perhaps one-off) needs can do special (perhaps one-off) things
> >without jumping through too many hoops.
>
> No one is suggesting removing rc.local, and I would vigorously oppose
> doing so.
>
> As I sai
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 06:13:36PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, David O'Brien wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 05:29:30PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 07:30:14AM +, Doug Barton wrote:
Modified files:
etc/rc.d early.s
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > You didn't even bother to ask on freebsd-rc.
> It was discussed there at the time that I added support for local
> scripts in the overall boot order. The period of time between now and
> then is longer tha
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'm not opposed to that idea (in fact I seriously considered it) but
the reason I didn't do it is that I don't have a good sense of why we
need it. Once again as Mike pointed out, the reason that it was ther
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not opposed to that idea (in fact I seriously considered it) but
> the reason I didn't do it is that I don't have a good sense of why we
> need it. Once again as Mike pointed out, the reason that it was there,
> and the reason it was .sh was specificall
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, David O'Brien wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 05:29:30PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 07:30:14AM +, Doug Barton wrote:
Modified files:
etc/rc.d early.sh
Log:
Deprecate use of the early.sh script as advertised when the support
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 05:29:30PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 07:30:14AM +, Doug Barton wrote:
> > Modified files:
> > etc/rc.d early.sh
> > Log:
> > Deprecate use of the early.sh script as advertised when the support for
> > local rc.d script
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 05:07:45PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I must confess I don't really see the point of this change. Yes, people
> > can write rc.d scripts instead, but not (by far) as easily as they can
> > add a line or two to r
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 12:21:36PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
> "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 07:30:14AM +, Doug Barton wrote:
> > > Modified files:
> > > etc/rc.d early.sh
> > > Log:
> > > Deprecate use of the early.sh scri
Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I must confess I don't really see the point of this change. Yes, people
> can write rc.d scripts instead, but not (by far) as easily as they can
> add a line or two to rc.early.
>
> If the problem is that rc.early is sourced by early.sh which is so
"David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 07:30:14AM +, Doug Barton wrote:
> > Modified files:
> > etc/rc.d early.sh
> > Log:
> > Deprecate use of the early.sh script as advertised when the support for
> > local rc.d scripts in the overall bo
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 07:30:14AM +, Doug Barton wrote:
> Modified files:
> etc/rc.d early.sh
> Log:
> Deprecate use of the early.sh script as advertised when the support for
> local rc.d scripts in the overall boot order was added.
". /etc/rc.early" in /etc/rc will s
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
DB> dougb 2007-10-09 07:30:14 UTC
DB>
DB> FreeBSD src repository
DB>
DB> Modified files:
DB> etc/rc.d early.sh
DB> Log:
DB> Deprecate use of the early.sh script as advertised when the support for
DB> local rc.d scripts in th
21 matches
Mail list logo
