On 12/04/2010 01:21, Ade Lovett wrote:
On Dec 04, 2010, at 03:13 , Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, Ade Lovett wrote:
Rework bsd.autotools.mk now that we have a single legacy
autoconf/automake (2.13/1.4) and an up-to-date version.
Hatemail to:ade
Thanks to: ade
Hah! Le
On Dec 04, 2010, at 03:13 , Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, Ade Lovett wrote:
>> Rework bsd.autotools.mk now that we have a single legacy autoconf/automake
>> (2.13/1.4) and an up-to-date version.
>>
>> Hatemail to:ade
>
> Thanks to:ade
Hah! Let's just make sure I didn't k
On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, Ade Lovett wrote:
> Rework bsd.autotools.mk now that we have a single legacy autoconf/automake
> (2.13/1.4) and an up-to-date version.
>
> Hatemail to:ade
Thanks to: ade
Gerald
___
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Modified files:
> Mk bsd.autotools.mk
> Log:
> Revert previous, bogus commit. Sorry!
Sorry! I immediately noticed the mistake, alas it wouldn't allow me
to do cvs admin -o 1.35 bsd.autotools.mk so an immediate explicit
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:23:57 -0500, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
linimon 2007-03-27 01:23:57 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
Mk bsd.autotools.mk
devel/libtool15 Makefile
Log:
I do not appreciate the attempt to play politics w
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:37:19PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Why not portmgr@ or back to ade@ in the MAINTAINER?
Simple error in haste. Fixed, thanks.
mcl
___
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
Ade Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mar 15, 2006, at 01:51 , Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> > libtool.m4, actually. devel/gnu-libtool installs it:
> So? devel/gnu-libtool was not touched by this change, nor, indeed,
> were any of the devel/gnu-* autotools.
So why are you telling people to
On Mar 15, 2006, at 01:51 , Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
libtool.m4, actually. devel/gnu-libtool installs it:
So? devel/gnu-libtool was not touched by this change, nor, indeed,
were any of the devel/gnu-* autotools.
Compare and contrast what happens with the old gnu-libtool installed:
A
Ade Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mar 14, 2006, at 05:10 , Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> > It used to be a breeze. It is now considerably harder, because
> > gnu-autoconf's aclocal can't find libtool.ac, so you can't build
> > anything that uses libtool.
> I don't see a libtool.ac anywher
On Mar 14, 2006, at 05:10 , Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Good! Now explain to me what good it does to have them around on an
ELF system. What functionality do you gain from .la files?
1. they provide a platform-independent method of indicating
dependencies
2. they're used by code that util
Ade Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mar 10, 2006, at 00:58 , Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> > The purpose of .la files is to record dependencies between libraries.
> I am fully aware of .la files do. Really.
Good! Now explain to me what good it does to have them around on an
ELF system. W
On Mar 10, 2006, at 00:58 , Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
The purpose of .la files is to record dependencies between libraries.
I am fully aware of .la files do. Really.
The ELF format stores these dependencies in the libraries themselves,
so the .la files serve no purpose, and it's actually h
Ade Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mar 07, 2006, at 16:59 , Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> > .la files are useless on an ELF system
> Cite, please? Given that around 35% of our libtool-using ports
> already installed .la files prior to this change, as well as
> extensive use of them in Linu
On Mar 07, 2006, at 16:59 , Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
.la files are useless on an ELF system
Cite, please? Given that around 35% of our libtool-using ports
already installed .la files prior to this change, as well as
extensive use of them in Linux and NetBSD's pkgsrc (both of which run
Ade Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * all the legacy hacks to libtool that we have been saddled with
> over the years have been removed. (eg: .la files are now
> installed) This brings us in line not only with Linux
> distributions, but also pkgsrc.
.la files are useless on an ELF sys
You rules! Thanks!
Cheers,
Mezz
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 04:43:34 -0600, Ade Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ade 2006-02-23 10:43:34 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
Mk bsd.autotools.mk
Log:
Conversion to a single libtool environment.
* devel/l
Am Thu, 23 Feb 2006 05:24:07 -0800
schrieb Ade Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> As with any major change, there will always be edge cases, and I'm
> sure my inbox will fill up with tales of woe over the coming days and
> weeks.
And that's the reason why I asked for an entry in UPDATING. Just say
On Feb 23, 2006, at 04:45 , Alexander Leidinger wrote:
According to cvsweb the revision for graphics/chbg wasn't bumped, so I
don't expect it to work.
Well, herein lies the problem. This is a *wide* ranging commit, and
as such, there is no way to please everybody. It's also a non-
trivial
Am Thu, 23 Feb 2006 04:30:29 -0800
schrieb Ade Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Feb 23, 2006, at 03:50 , Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Anything that should be added to UPDATING (e.g. "portupgrade -rf
> > x11-toolkits/gtk12" or something like that)?
>
> To be brutally honest, I don't know. In
On Feb 23, 2006, at 03:50 , Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Anything that should be added to UPDATING (e.g. "portupgrade -rf
x11-toolkits/gtk12" or something like that)?
To be brutally honest, I don't know. In the case of the glib/gtk
1.2.x stuff, it would be against devel/glib12 rather than x11
Am Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:43:34 + (UTC)
schrieb Ade Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ade 2006-02-23 10:43:34 UTC
>
> FreeBSD ports repository
>
> Modified files:
> Mk bsd.autotools.mk
> Log:
> Conversion to a single libtool environment.
Anything that should
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:54:39AM +, Ade Lovett wrote:
> Now that the mass-conversion is done, print out a helpful message
> (via .warning) for pending ports etc. that use the Old World Order
> for autotools.
oh oh...
I have this gnomeing feeling...
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis |
22 matches
Mail list logo
