Mark Linimon wrote:
if I can suggest a file kind of like UPDATING which is a list of subsystems
that are believed to be broken/experimental, with a column for expiration
date, that might be enough.
CHOPPING_BLOCK ?
___
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing l
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 09:19:20PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
phk:
> > "Fix PCVT to be SMP locked, do the right things with TTYs,
> > work with whatever is the state of the art in keyboards.
> > And do so before August 1st OR ELSE".
> >
> >Now, in your own mind, think for a moment what
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Mon, 2006-May-22 10:37:09 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Jeremy writes:
The main reason it does not work is that whenever some feature is
put on notice, a number of very vocal people will come out defending
exactly that feature as t
On Mon, 2006-May-22 10:37:09 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Jeremy writes:
>The main reason it does not work is that whenever some feature is
>put on notice, a number of very vocal people will come out defending
>exactly that feature as the only reason the wo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Jeremy writes:
>I totally agree. My concern is the (apparent) lack of a formal process.
Blunt speaking time:
The reason why we don't have a more formal process is that whenever we
try that, it does not work.
The main reason it does not work is that wheneve
On Sun, 2006-May-21 18:27:31 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>> my intention to be offensive, merely to draw attention to problems we
>> have with product management. These problems remain.
I suspect that the e-mail grog is apologising for should have been
on a private mailing list rather than a public
> my intention to be offensive, merely to draw attention to problems we
> have with product management. These problems remain.
The pcvt removal has been long planned. I don't see how it points out
a problem in the project. The software didn't keep pace with the
development of the system, and th
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 07:45:56AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote..
> A number of people have contacted me expressing concern about the
> message I sent recently, and that I was being rude to phk. I formally
> apologize to phk and anybody else who might feel offended. It wasn't
> my intention t
