On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 08:11:47PM +, Cy Schubert wrote:
> FreeBSD ports repository
> Modified files:
> mail/mutt-devel Makefile
Given I don't think we'll ever see a Mutt 1.6 and some (many IT folks?)
are scared off by the "-devel" desgination; what do you think about
renaming 'm
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:00:28PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
> crees 2012-05-31 22:00:28 UTC
...
> Approved by:maintainer timeout on previous commit that this is to fix,
> so this is implicit
What maintainer timeout? I've seen no emails from you in the past few
days.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:38:20PM -0500, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> On 12/15/2010 8:23 PM, David E. O'Brien wrote:
> > PR: 152917
> > Submitted by: obrien
> > Approved by:pgollucci
> I didn't approve this nor am I able to :)
>
> Responsible Changed
> From-To: freebsd
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:30:41AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 05/11/10 00:47, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
> >
> > Doug, the OPTIONS patch as you posted it on ports@ does not play so
> > well with shells/bash-static. I've created shells/bash-static in order
> > to have packages created by the build clu
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 06:18:49PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> Ew, I don't like that at all. Why should I rebuild (say) bash just
> because someone fixes a typo in the description? The port is already
> installed, and I have no intention of reading the description until
> *maybe* the next t
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 09:23:25PM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:14:13PM +0000, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:34:26PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > > David O'Brien wrote:
> > > >There is zero reason
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:34:26PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:54:01AM +, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
> >>osa 2009-03-12 09:54:01 UTC
> >> FreeBSD ports repository
> >> Modified files:
> &
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:59:19AM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
> The following line should be removed from MOVED:
> shells/bash3|shells/bash|2004-08-11|move latest stable version to unnumbered
> directory
Emanuel, thanks! Committed.
___
cvs-all@freebsd
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:34:26PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:54:01AM +, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
>>> osa 2009-03-12 09:54:01 UTC
>>> FreeBSD ports repository
>>> Modified files:
>&g
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:54:01AM +, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
> osa 2009-03-12 09:54:01 UTC
> FreeBSD ports repository
> Modified files:
> shells/bash Makefile pkg-plist
> Log:
> Fix pkg-plist.
> Bump PORTREVISION.
Thanks for fixing the PLIST (much appreciated),
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 01:16:29PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:47:55 -0800, "David O'Brien"
> wrote:
> >> freefall can be used for doc builds (at least it is suposed to, so
> >> poke clusteradm if it can't at some poi
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:11:28AM +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> On 2009.01.31 09:17:30 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:48:07 + (UTC), "David E. O'Brien"
> > wrote:
> > > obrien 2009-01-30 18:48:07 UTC
> > >
> > > FreeBSD doc repository
> > >
> > > Modif
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 08:37:27AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 07:56:11AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
>>> David E. O'Brien wrote:
>>>
>>>> obrien 2008-09-23 14:45:10 UTC
>>>> Fr
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 05:21:04PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> Below you have changed a few places back to actually use bcmp instead
> of memcmp.
> I see lots of or more places in our kernel using memcmp. Are you
> saying that they all need to be memcmp instead of bcmp and had been
> unproper re
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 08:13:53AM -0700, David O'Brien (@FreeBSD) wrote:
> So provide a proper memcmp(9), but it is a C implementation not
> a tuned assembly implementation. Therefore bcmp(9) should be
> preferred over memcmp(9).
Perhaps I should have mentioned
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 07:56:11AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
> David E. O'Brien wrote:
>> obrien 2008-09-23 14:45:10 UTC
>> FreeBSD src repository
>> Modified files:
>> sys/conf files sys/fs/tmpfs tmpfs.h
>> tmpfs_subr.c tmpfs_vnops.c sys/i386/i386b
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 03:13:00PM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>>> SVN rev 182551 on 2008-08-31 17:23:45Z by nwhitehorn
>>> Back out r182439 to move device bm to PowerPC-specific NOTES, and
>>> replace it by an MFC of r179646, which does the same thing.
..
>> I though the FreeBSD committe
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 11:19:52AM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
> As this is not a sole change (and it is a part of a bigger plan) I
> intended to do a __FreeBSD_version bump just once all the changes are
> in place.
It is better to bump it when the incompatibility is committed.
You can bump __FreeBS
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 06:24:42PM +0200, Pawel Worach wrote:
> David E. O'Brien wrote:
>> obrien 2008-08-19 14:23:31 UTC
>> FreeBSD src repository
>> Modified files:
>> etc/defaults rc.conf share/man/man5 rc.conf.5
>> Added files:
>> etc/rc.d kerne
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 04:58:05PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> There is a better way to do what you want though. You're using loader
> still, right?
Correct - however loader.conf is ignored.
> I have old code kicking around that allowed linking the
> kernel against a hal module properly. I did t
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 05:51:12PM -0700, David O'Brien (@FreeBSD) wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 04:58:05PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > I think you should leave it in Juniper's tree for a tad longer:
> > ../../../kern/link_elf_obj.c:88: error: redefin
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 04:58:05PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:37 PM, David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:35:35AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 9:35 AM, David E. O'Bri
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:35:35AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 9:35 AM, David E. O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Author: obrien
> > Date: Thu Jul 10 16:35:57 2008
> > New Revision: 180431
> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/180431
> >
> > Log:
> > Allow 'el
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 08:42:08AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Speed of grep is a tier-1 feature.
>
> I agree with you on that, but keep in mind that _if_ we want to ship
> 8.0-RELEASE with a BSD licensed grep the default would have to be changed
> in HEAD sooner rather than later. That's the o
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 11:39:22PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> I've attached a patch which does what I described above for CPIO, and
> adds a knob to turn off building of GNU grep. When we get to the point
> where bsd grep is imported into the base system, I would do the same in
> HEAD/8-current fo
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 05:23:27PM +0200, Joel wrote:
> George V. Neville-Neil skrev:
>> gnn 2008-06-12 19:46:57 UTC
>> FreeBSD src repository
>> Modified files:
>> .access Log:
>> SVN rev 179764 on 2008-06-12 19:46:57Z by gnn
>> Add Ivan Voras as a src c
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 06:31:17AM +, John Birrell wrote:
> jb 2008-06-09 06:31:17 UTC
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> sys/conf kern.pre.mk
> Log:
> SVN rev 179665 on 2008-06-09 06:31:17Z by jb
>
> Remove some sparc-specific stuff from my e
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 05:37:24PM -0700, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Well, as I said it might not be something strictly required, but why not be
> nice to ISVs and users? Ability to run binaries compiled on 6.4 on previous
> 6.x releases is really important in many situations.
No, it can be quite er
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 02:41:06PM -0700, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Xin LI wrote:
>> delphij 2008-05-27 20:04:27 UTC
>> FreeBSD src repository
>> Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
>> include string.h lib/libc/string Makefile.inc
>> memchr.3 sys/sys
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 08:31:02AM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
> According to our tier documentation, sun4v is a tier 2 platform -- either
> on the way up, or on the way down, depending on how you look at it. All of
> the other tier 2 platforms, including ARM, PowerPC, ia64 and sparc64,
> appear
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 09:27:12AM -0400, Coleman Kane wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 18:35 -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:16:39AM -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
> > > I'm looking forward to when we can remove both GNU cpio and our current
&
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:16:39AM -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
> I'm looking forward to when we can remove both GNU cpio and our current
> pax implementation from the tree,
I don't see a reason to remove pax from the tree. It is already BSDL'ed
and is faster than libarchive based archivers. Ple
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 09:38:28AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Back to this case. There are non-GPL implementations of libdwarf out
> there. I think the API is well and truly fair game at this point.
In fact SGI's first libdwarf library release was under a BSDL. So if API
in the release is the o
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 11:40:09AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> The other big problem of course is that if a file is set to 'o'
> expansion mode (preserve keywords, eg: cvs admin -ko or cvs import
> -ko), then 'cvs update -A' always repeats the checkout, over and over
> again.
..
> This is a pretty d
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:33:27PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 March 2008 10:47:03 am David E. O'Brien wrote:
> > obrien 2008-03-19 14:47:03 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD src repository
> >
> > src/contrib/cvs - Imported sources
> > Update of /home/ncvs/src/contrib/cvs
> > In
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 05:41:18PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Oleksandr Tymoshenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > gonzo 2008-04-29 11:17:45 UTC
> > Modified files:
> > sys/sys user.h
> > Log:
> > Define KINFO_PROC_SIZE for mips.
..
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 09:59:05AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 09:35:24PM +, Sam Leffler wrote:
>>> .exclude Log:
>>> add iwn firmware
>>
>> Hi Sam,
>> I notice w
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 09:35:24PM +, Sam Leffler wrote:
> .exclude
> Log:
> add iwn firmware
Hi Sam,
I notice we keep excluding $FreeBSD$ from uuencoded firmware files.
At least looking at sys/contrib/dev/iwn/iwlwifi-4965-4.44.17.fw.uu,
which has a Copyright notic
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 12:31:08AM +, John Birrell wrote:
> At any point later in the lifecycle of these files, to see a diff of
> the changes from HEAD to the latest version of the file on the vendor
> branch, you have to diff against the tag of the latest import on the
> vendor branch.
Actua
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 09:00:05AM +, John Birrell wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 08:53:57AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 05:09:19AM +, John Birrell wrote:
> > > jb 2008-04-26 05:09:19 UTC
> > >
> > > FreeBSD src repository
> > >
> > > Modified
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 04:03:49AM +, John Birrell wrote:
> The remaining two lines:
> ^src/cddl/contrib/opensolaris
> ^src/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris
> need to stay.
Why do they need to stay, if we've made changes to every one of the files
in these trees (the claim I've heard).
--
-- Davi
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:21:08AM +, John Birrell wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 04:58:11PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 09:47:11PM +, John Birrell wrote:
> > > jb 2008-03-28 21:47:11 UTC
> > >
> > > FreeB
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 04:16:36AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
> "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This is what should be committed?
>
> No. My code was intended to replace Martin's, not to be merged with it
> into some kind of Frank
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 09:47:11PM +, John Birrell wrote:
> jb 2008-03-28 21:47:11 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> .exclude
> Log:
> Add the new CDDL paths which contain external src without FreeBSD IDs.
Why are these being exclu
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 07:29:28PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
> > I think this should be mentioned in the developer's handbook because,
> > IIRC, the sample .emacs file in there is bogus and doesn't really
> > respect style(9).
DES,
This is what should be committed?
Index: freebsd.el
==
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 06:02:44PM -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote:
>> Vim function to style(9).
>> Issue ':call FreeBSD_Style()' while editing a file.
>
> Should this file (and the Emacs file? Nah! :)) be documented somewhere
> (maybe the committer's guide or style(9)) to make it easier to find?
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:23:44AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
> "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Uggg!! Very sorry about that - I was using GENERIC so I could keep an up
> > to date bootable kernel between the commits.
>
> GENERIC
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:25:51PM +, Robert Watson wrote:
> To be specific, it's about code on the order of the following -- in the
> include file:
> vfs_quotactl_t nnpfs_quotactl;
>
> In the .c file here nnpfs_quotactl is implemented:
> int
> nnpfs_quotactl(struct mount *mp, int cmd,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:29:57PM +, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
>> Umm, OK, I didn't spot that. It's unfortunate that David didn't change
>> our own file system code to match (or even build LINT, which would have
>> shown him the problem), so that
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 02:43:17AM -0800, David O'Brien (@FreeBSD) wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:35:51AM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > David E. O'Brien wrote:
> >> obrien 2008-02-25 08:55:02 UTC
> >> FreeBSD src repository
> >&
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:35:51AM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> David E. O'Brien wrote:
>> obrien 2008-02-25 08:55:02 UTC
>> FreeBSD src repository
>> Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
>> sys/fs/nullfsnull_vfsops.c sys/fs/nwfs
>> nwfs_vfsops.c sys/fs/
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:34:49AM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> David E. O'Brien wrote:
>> obrien 2008-02-25 06:30:24 UTC
>> FreeBSD src repository
>> Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
>> sys/ufs/ffs ffs_alloc.c ffs_balloc.c ffs_inode.c
>> ff
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 12:42:29AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
> Andrew Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Added files:
> > sys/geom/lvm g_lvm.c g_lvm.h
> > share/man/man4 geom_lvm.4
> > Log:
> > Add a geom class to map Linux LVM logical volumes.
>
> I real
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 10:28:53PM +, Wesley Shields wrote:
> Modified files:
> sysutils/lsofMakefile
> Log:
> Add MASTER_SITE_LOCAL since the primary distribution site rejects
> connections without working reverse DNS.
This is a mistake. ISPs that aren't providing revers
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 06:24:56PM +0600, Max Khon wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 09:16:11AM +, Max Khon wrote:
>>> fjoe2007-03-08 09:16:11 UTC
>>> Modified files:
>>> usr.bin/make
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:12:02AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Mike Makonnen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 00:33 +, Doug Barton wrote:
> >> dougb 2008-01-29 00:33:16 UTC
> >>
> >> FreeBSD src repository
> >>
> >> Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6)
> >> etc/rc.d
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 08:38:13AM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 08:33:34PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 05:09:41PM +, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > > o For things that should be at least 64 bits wide, use long long
> >
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 05:09:41PM +, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> o For things that should be at least 64 bits wide, use long long
> and not int64_t, as the latter is an optional type.
I don't follow - int64_t is an ISO-C99 type, and we have it in FreeBSD.
Is this code expected to be taken from
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 10:00:40PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> How about if we restore the check whose aim was to avoid cluttering
> mailing lists with questions about upsupported source upgrades, but
> make it correspond to 6.0-RELEASE:
>
> %%%
> Index: Makefile.inc1
>
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 03:54:52PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> Also, if there are ports distfiles that unzip doesn't handle then there are
> likely other zip files in the wild that users may run into that it won't
> handle either. In that case, I think the ports distfiles are a good canary
> f
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 02:35:07AM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Tim Kientzle wrote:
Of course, giving those four ports a build-time dependency
on the Info-Zip version is arguably the right approach
in any case.
>>>
>>> That would probably be undesirable because it would mean having
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 09:16:11AM +, Max Khon wrote:
> fjoe2007-03-08 09:16:11 UTC
> Modified files:
> usr.bin/make globals.h job.c job.h main.c make.1
> make.h parse.c
> Log:
> Implement "Remaking Makefiles" feature:
>
> After reading
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:34:03AM -0800, Sam Leffler wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
> The flip side of this is that I just tried to resolve some compile issues
> with netstat in the RELENG_7 branch and diff's against HEAD hit all the
> gratuitous "style changes"
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 10:31:49PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> 2) merge conflicts cause everybody pain. It is no fun getting 100 conflicts
> because somebody just did a de-__P() sweep.
>
> Having said that, we have grown overly sensitive to both 1) and 2).
I agree. We seem to have become overly
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:39:11PM +0100, Max Laier wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 January 2008, David E. O'Brien wrote:
> > obrien 2008-01-08 19:08:58 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD src repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > sys/netinet6 frag6.c icmp6.c in6.c in6_ifattach.c
> >
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:47:36AM +, Sren Schmidt wrote:
> sos 2007-12-13 11:47:36 UTC
> Modified files:
> sys/dev/ata ata-all.h ata-chipset.c ata-dma.c
> ata-lowlevel.c
> Log:
> Implement a workaround of the datacorruption problem on serve
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 06:59:21PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> David E. O'Brien wrote:
>> obrien 2008-01-02 01:45:31 UTC
>> FreeBSD src repository
>> Modified files:
>> sys/cam cam_xpt.c Log:
>> style(9)
>> Revision ChangesPath
>> 1.193 +73 -73src/sys
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 10:20:11PM +, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> kientzle2008-01-01 22:20:11 UTC
> Log:
> The .uu files in libarchive/test don't require $FreeBSD$ keywords.
However, the $FreeBSD$ in uuencoded files do not cause a problem.
Since having the keyword makes it easier to see what
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 01:36:27PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:34:02
> -0800):
>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 09:23:55AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>> This change does make it so one
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 09:23:55AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>> Also set LATEST_LINK so 'pkg_add -r linux_base' works.
>
> I'm indifferent between "good idea" and "I don't care": Why do you want
> to do such a pkg_add? Shouldn't "pkg_add -r " do the right thing
> (add the right linux_ba
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:33:50AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, David E. O'Brien wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to just convert the port to use the OPTIONS
> framework?
It already is if you define WITH_OPTIONS/WITH_VIM_OPTIONS.
___
c
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 05:26:34PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> This is a completely awesome demonstration of the proverbial bikeshed. I
> only wish that, someday, an important subsystem that I spend months/years
> working on will be judged by the names and prefixes that I
> used in it. I can bare
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 11:23:03AM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
> Let's see what we can do it in the future: teach pkg_search about how to
> download an INDEX file for use, something that you don't have to install
> the whole ports tree and can do easily.
That is a great idea.
> I think this is a very us
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 10:59:13AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> You can accomplish the same thing by doing:
> cd /usr/ports
> make search name=blah
>
> Note, I'm not commenting on the value of the pkg_search tool, or the
> worth of including it in the base, or anything else other than to say
> that
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 11:01:58AM +, Kirill Ponomarew wrote:
> Backout previous commit, since it's done without maintainers
> approval. These changes were approved by adding it as port to
> ports/ tree, but not for src/.
You know - you should have asked me my motivation for adding this
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 04:13:54PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> Quoting Kirill Ponomarew, who wrote on Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 11:01:58AM +
> ..
> > krion 2007-12-09 11:01:58 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD src repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > usr.sbin/pkg_install Makefile
> > usr.s
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 11:52:15AM +0100, Kirill Ponomarew wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 02:06:03AM +, David E. O'Brien wrote:
> > obrien 2007-12-09 02:06:00 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD src repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > usr.sbin/pkg_install Makefile
> > usr.sbin/pkg_inst
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 06:42:12PM +0100, Max Laier wrote:
> On Sunday 09 December 2007, David E. O'Brien wrote:
> > obrien 2007-12-09 04:24:09 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD src repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > release Makefile
> > Log:
> > Make it easier to experiment wit
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 09:50:40PM +, John Birrell wrote:
> jb 2007-11-28 21:50:40 UTC
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Added files:
> sys/compat/opensolaris/sys bitmap.h cpupart.h cpuvar.h
>cyclic.h elf.h mman.h modctl.h
>
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 06:51:03PM -0800, Kip Macy wrote:
> I have FSF paperwork for GDB - do you know if that extends to other
> pieces of FSF source?
It does not.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
___
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.free
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 12:10:08AM +, John Birrell wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 01:03:30AM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > John Birrell wrote:
> > >jb 2007-11-23 23:54:45 UTC
> > >
> > > FreeBSD src repository
> > >
> > > Modified files:
> > >contrib/binutils/opcodes ppc-dis.
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 12:10:08AM +, John Birrell wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 01:03:30AM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > John Birrell wrote:
> > >jb 2007-11-23 23:54:45 UTC
> > >
> > > FreeBSD src repository
> > >
> > > Modified files:
> > >contrib/binutils/opcodes ppc-dis.
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 11:57:05PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 05:46:09PM -0400, Ken Smith wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 13:30 -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 02:47:13PM -0400,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 05:46:09PM -0400, Ken Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 13:30 -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 02:47:13PM -0400, Ken Smith wrote:
> > > If portmgr@ uses RELENG_6 to base their builds on breaking forward
> > > co
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 01:32:52PM -0700, LI Xin wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 02:47:13PM -0400, Ken Smith wrote:
> >> If portmgr@ uses RELENG_6 to base their builds on breaking forward
> >> compat would mean all consumers of packages-
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 02:47:13PM -0400, Ken Smith wrote:
> If portmgr@ uses RELENG_6 to base their builds on breaking forward
> compat would mean all consumers of packages-6-stable would also need
> to use RELENG_6.
When did this sease being a requirement?
'pkg_add -r' certainly enforces this re
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 10:37:22AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> and I are saying about having a justification for changes.
..
> The ctype ABI change
> isn't like that at all; it's mandatory and it can't be
> worked around. We also asked that even justifiable changes be evaluated
> to see if there w
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 05:31:03PM -0400, Ken Smith wrote:
> What we need to try and avoid unless *absolutely* *necessary* is the
> part Scott quoted above - binaries compiled on 6.3-REL should work on
> 6.2-REL unless there was a really big issue and the solution to that
> issue required us to bre
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:35:10AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> It might be a good idea to drop msdosfs off of this list. Real physical
> filesystems in Windoze world are typically NTFS now, and FAT is used
> mainly in removable storage.
Not nessisarly - vfat/fat32 is the only reliable FS tha
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 03:23:09PM +, Mark Peek wrote:
> mp 2007-10-15 15:23:08 UTC
> FreeBSD src repository
> src/contrib/tcsh - Imported sources
> Update of /home/ncvs/src/contrib/tcsh
> In directory repoman.freebsd.org:/tmp/cvs-serv62768
>
> Log Message:
> Import two
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 06:04:41AM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> I originally added /etc/rc.early to have a way to do things that
> needed to happen before fsck, such as arming watchdogs, tweaking
> drive parameters or get crypto key material necessary for filesystem
> access.
>
> None of thes
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 03:47:24PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> Whatever happened to renumbering all symbol versioned libraries
> to libfoo.0? Or even libfoo.0.0. The whole point of symbol
> versioning is that we don't need to bump library versions
> for ABI breakage.
That's what I'd like to s
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 02:22:43PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday 11 October 2007 01:28:23 pm David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 12:58:36PM +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 09:29:57AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
>
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 06:13:36PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, David O'Brien wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 05:29:30PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 07:30:14AM +, Doug Barton wrote:
>>&
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 12:58:36PM +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 09:29:57AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > Shipping a libkse.so.3 in 7.0, would be yet another FreeBSD weirdism as
> > folks may wonder where .1 & 2 are.
>
> They are ri
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 05:29:30PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 07:30:14AM +, Doug Barton wrote:
> > Modified files:
> > etc/rc.d early.sh
> > Log:
> > Deprecate use of the early.sh script as advertised when
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 01:16:03PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
> "David E. O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Log:
> > Repo copy libpthreads to libkse.
> > This introduces the WITHOUT_LIBKSE nob,
> > and changes WITHOUT_LIBPTHREADS to mean with neither threading libs.
> > Appro
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 12:21:36PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
> "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 07:30:14AM +, Doug Barton wrote:
> > > Modified files:
> > > etc/rc.d early.sh
&g
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 07:30:14AM +, Doug Barton wrote:
> Modified files:
> etc/rc.d early.sh
> Log:
> Deprecate use of the early.sh script as advertised when the support for
> local rc.d scripts in the overall boot order was added.
". /etc/rc.early" in /etc/rc will s
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 01:36:21AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> Erik Trulsson wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 05:05:05PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
>>> On 10/5/07, Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 10:49:09PM +, Jack F Vogel wrote:
..
> Log:
> MFC o
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
