Re: State of NET_MPSAFE in -9 and/or -current?

hello. Thanks for the reply. I'll check out the document. Good to know TCP and UDP aren't yet MP safe. -Brian

Re: State of NET_MPSAFE in -9 and/or -current?

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 3:19 AM Brian Buhrow wrote: > > hello. I'm wondering if someone could comment on the state of using > NET_MPSAFE kernels? > Is it ready for production use yet? > -thanks > -Brian > It depends on your machine(s) and usages. doc/TODO.smpnet[1] lists up MP-safe com

daily CVS update output

Updating src tree: P src/doc/CHANGES P src/sys/arch/arm/xscale/pxa2x0_lcd.h P src/sys/arch/evbarm/fdt/fdt_machdep.c P src/sys/arch/evbppc/virtex/dcr.c P src/sys/arch/evbppc/virtex/dcr.h P src/sys/arch/mips/adm5120/dev/ahci.c P src/sys/arch/powerpc/include/bus_defs.h P src/sys/arch/powerpc/include

State of NET_MPSAFE in -9 and/or -current?

hello. I'm wondering if someone could comment on the state of using NET_MPSAFE kernels? Is it ready for production use yet? -thanks -Brian