Re: [css-d] Aural Style Sheets

d for surfing the web is probably the single most common misconception about assistive technologies. They can and do interface to IE and Firefox, but they are used for a lot more than that. Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons h

Re: [css-d] Aural Style Sheets

actually working on after 40 minutes. If you're using Windows already you can also do this using Virtual PC from Microsoft - it's now free to download. Of course, in both cases, you'll need a Windows install disc to create the original disk image. HTH

Re: [css-d] Everything looks great...except Safari!

ot;[85] BaseChar ::= [#x0041-#x005A]" (continues at length...) Where #x0041-#x005A denotes the characters A to Z. Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [

Re: [css-d] Firefox & IE Scaling Issue Goes Deeper than Fonts

t way we won't see it.) It's much better to post a link to the problematic page so people can test with the precise content that you're having problems with. Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __

Re: [css-d] Safari form input height

in this: "CSS 2.1 does not define which properties apply to form controls and frames, or how CSS can be used to style them. User agents may apply CSS properties to these elements. Authors are recommended to treat such support as experimental." <http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/conform.h

Re: [css-d] [solved] Background shorthand: Quick question

erpreted, > right?). It still sounds like an invitation to use the "x y" order :) Although "top 5%" is invalid, that's only because the horizontal position must come first if one of the values is not a keyword; so &quo

Re: [css-d] [solved] Background shorthand: Quick question

> From: Rafael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nick Fitzsimons wrote: > Although "top 5%" is invalid, that's only because the > horizontal position > must come first if one of the values is not a keyword; > so "5% top" or "left >

Re: [css-d] IE6 to IE7 to IE6 design

as everything else. The best thing you can do, if you have it working in IE 6, is to throw it away and start again. Trying to go in the direction of getting IE 6-compatible CSS to work in proper browsers is the road to insanity.

Re: [css-d] Font-size checker

uld see, they realised that it was better to work to the limitations of the destination technology, rather than show the client beautifully smooth designs which were not, in reality, achieveable in a web browser on Windows. Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ _

Re: [css-d] Font-size checker

of the destination > technology, > >>rather than show the client beautifully smooth designs > which were not, in > >>reality, achieveable in a web browser on Windows. > > Thats a very good idea, I will suggest it, I think it'll go > down like a lead > balloon

Re: [css-d] Font-size checker

aying that, even if the colour was changed using a "!important" rule elsewhere (which would be the only way to override the specificity of that attribute), that DOM property would remain unchanged, because it reflects what was in the page source, not the computed style. R

Re: [css-d] * in css

to be admin of this list - hi Eric :-) <http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/05/31/universal-child-replacement/> Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.c

Re: [css-d] * in css

to be admin of this list - hi Eric :-) <http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2005/05/31/universal-child-replacement/> Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.c

Re: [css-d] I'm not that good with tables.

need the colspan="2" attribute. ... ... ... ... should do it. But you shouldn't use tables for layout. Use CSS: the list wiki will help you find the resources where you can learn how to do a simple header/two columns

Re: [css-d] I'm not that good with tables.

On 19 Sep 2007, at 18:50, Nick Fitzsimons wrote: > But you shouldn't use tables for layout. Ah, just seen your earlier post about this being for an HTML newsletter; forget what I said. For HTML email, it looks like we're stuck with tables for the foreseeable future. Incid

Re: [css-d] Safari background issue

reconsider their position. Version 2.0.4 will be around for quite some time to come. Yet another browser to support... Oh, link for those interested: <http://nightly.webkit.org/> Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/

Re: [css-d] Safari background issue

ld have been reporting bugs, not devising workarounds which were redundant in the finished product. It's the same with Safari 3; the time to start testing _our_ work is when the final version is released. Until that date we are testing _Apple'

Re: [css-d] Margin vs. Padding

ttp://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/box.html#collapsing-margins> Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://c

Re: [css-d] Margin vs. Padding

On 27 Sep 2007, at 14:40, Mark Story wrote: > Nick Fitzsimons wrote: >> On 27 Sep 2007, at 14:04, Scott Povlot wrote: >>> If I don't have a border, what is the difference >>> between using padding or margin to add space around an >>> element? Is there an

Re: [css-d] Question about attribute selectors

-- #fred[id="fred"]| 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | = 110 as 110 is greater than the 100 of #fred. Phew! Fun stuff, CSS, ain't it? :-D > am i just a complete fool and i'm doing something obviously wrong? Not a fool, and not _obvio

Re: [css-d] Absolute position problem in IE

uld cause the problem you are encountering. You could use one of the usual methods, preferably a conditional comment, to give IE6 "height: 400px;" as IE 6 treats "height" as "min- height". HTH, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ ___

Re: [css-d] CSS specifictity conundrum

r than a rule with a selector, 0 otherwise (= a) (In HTML, values of an element's "style" attribute are style sheet rules. These rules have no selectors, so a=1, b=0, c=0, and d=0.)" <http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/cascade.html#specificity> So the style attribute

Re: [css-d] reserved words as properties?

your editor; even IE doesn't have _that_ degree of a problem parsing CSS. Assuming your editor isn't so cheeky as to auto-correct it (pun inevitable, I'm afraid) to something else, it won't be a problem. Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __

Re: [css-d] FW: IE6 and IE7 issues Need help

? > Absolute and relative font-size keywords, CSS 2.1: <http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/fonts.html#value-def-absolute-size> HTH, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: [css-d] IE8 beta1 parses IE5 mac band pass filter

t; Probably a more reliable way of communicating with them than expecting them to go off and check somebody else's wiki every day on the offchance there's something new there :-) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons h

Re: [css-d] IE8 beta1 parses IE5 mac band pass filter

ry sensibly) they drew on that body of existing and known-good code for the work on IE 8, and this CSS-comment -parsing bug has crept in along with the good stuff? Just a thought... Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/

Re: [css-d] IE8 is better but still slightly broken

e changes you've made out again. Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incu

Re: [css-d] how big is a space in ems?

the most common word spacing was a thick, or 1/3 of an em - 0.33em should be accurate enough :-) HTH, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/cs

Re: [css-d] Targeting IE8

e can make to the web development community is to inform them of these issues. <http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2008/03/05/ie8-beta-feedback.aspx> Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-dis

Re: [css-d] PNG transparency in IE6 and below

t; 7 an alternate background image in a format it can cope with. Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- ht

Re: [css-d] Conditional Commenting

Explorer 5 was in fact the only decent browser on the market - the intention was to allow fallback content for such lesser browsers as Netscape 3 and 4. Now that the roles are reversed, simply read "downlevel" as "uplevel" and vice ve

Re: [css-d] top border for list items not showing in ie

ng can display any less than one pixel anyway - a pixel is an indivisible thing, so you should just set the size of the border to be 1px - either the browser will round it up to 1px or round it down to 0px, when it becomes invisible. HTH, Nick. -- Nick Fitz

Re: [css-d] Font-color issue

aces on ems: <http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/bugs/browsers/css/IE-Win/ie_percent_test.html> Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/

Re: [css-d] Font sizing

nits> Even if you specify your font sizes in pixels, every browser other than IE will scale them up if the user hits Ctrl+ (and down with Ctrl-). In addition, a user who has set their minimum font size to be, say, 16px won't see your 9px and 14px text at

Re: [css-d] Is a missing ";" OK?

; > -- > ianpi...@mac.com > 07590 685840 | 01926 811383 > > > > > > > __ > css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://cs

Re: [css-d] Small-as-possible text in Opera?

but working in the browser, it's the browser whose notions get enforced. Opera has a minimum font size enabled by default, so playing with 1px text is never going to work with the default settings in that browser. This is why most people recommend using other techniques. R

Re: [css-d] CSS color names values versus accessibility

per had been involved in implementing that bit of code, and automatically used the English spelling. As a result, browsers nowadays support both "lightgrey" and "lightgray" for backwards compatibility... although none of those extended colour names appear in any formal s

Re: [css-d] CSS color names values versus accessibility

On 30 Mar 2007, at 14:26:14, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Nick Fitzsimons wrote: >> Incidentally, the "gray"/"grey" issue isn't helped by the fact that >> Netscape Navigator had an extensive list of colour names, which >> included both "gray"

Re: [css-d] min-height and IE

6 applies the rule; and the final comment lets IE Mac see whatever comes after. Have a look in the list wiki under Tan hack and star-html hack for more info. HTH, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discus

Re: [css-d] Another try: Flickering in Firefox

you don't see it unless loading from the server (network latency). Hope this helps you work out what direction to seek a solution in, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] h

Re: [css-d] Flickering in Firefox: the saga continues

nd. Big John said he > was > still experiencing it. Is that still true after my latest change, John. > Anyone else seeing the flicker in FF? > Looks fine at this end - no flicker at all. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsim

Re: [css-d] Aligning List Of Name:Value Pairs On Colon

suse of tables to achieve presentational goals. Table elements are there for the purpose of displaying tabular data, so if your data is tabular, use a table at that point on your page. That way your markup is semantically sound. Nick. -- N

Re: [css-d] Styling COL and COLGROUP

; is, if anything, _adding_ semantic information to the markup, which is as it should be. As Albert Einstein said in his early career as a web developer, "Markup should be as simple as possible, but no simpler." The extra classes have relevant names, so you shouldn'

Re: [css-d] CSS and HTML emails

which I could derive one scintilla of information in yonks, but if they'd sent plain text, I probably would have glanced through it :-) -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css

Re: [css-d] text being pushed below image

ther, but I'm at work and really should be concentrating on something else, so I'll leave that as an exercise for the reader :-) HTH, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://

Re: [css-d] always having this Problem with IE and linebreaks

all > ... > IE Win, for reasons unknown, treats even an empty element as being one line high. To fix it, apply: font-size: 0; and the gap closes up. HTH, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [E

Re: [css-d] XHTML Layout

ands out at the bottom of the > browser, even though there isn't enought content to populate the entire > screen? And _should_ there be more than enough content, it should just > drop the footer to the end of the content. > Have a look at http://www.themaninblue.com/writing/perspecti

Re: [css-d] 2 divs in centered, floating

> Sorry I'm not helping you further, but I'm desperate to leave > work right now. Enjoy your evening :-) Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www

Re: [css-d] risks of using p.initial:first-letter?

Thus, authors may use these elements in conjunction with style sheets, the lang attribute, etc., to tailor HTML to their own needs and tastes." <http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/global.html#edef-SPAN> So I'd say don't worry about i

Re: [css-d] Problem in WinXP SP2 (Correct E-mail)

wser setting to check "Automatically" (Tools menu > Internet Options dialog > General tab > Temporary Internet Files fieldset > Settings... button) and see if that fixes it. If so, you can relax, as this is the default setting, meaning 99% of visitors won't

Re: [css-d] Site Check, Please; Some Questions

then the h1 will have margins of 14 pixels, not 10. Personally, I find having the 10px base size so useful in specifying the structure of the page that I don't mind reaching for the calculator occasionally when dealing with that kind of case, b

Re: [css-d] IE5/PC compatible liquid layout?

in the right direction: <http://positioniseverything.net/articles/onetruelayout/appendix/holygrail> HTH, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.o

Re: [css-d] recomendation of 3column layouts

talking about :-) HTH, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evo

Re: [css-d] Float containment problem in IE/Win

, prevents one tehcnology being dependant on another for correct operation. Just my tuppence, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/l

Re: [css-d] Unable to fix font size in specific class

k you once again for offering to help. You might want to have a look at Dan Cederholm's new book "Bulletproof Web Design", which addresses exactly this kind of issue. > > Isn't this list great :) Works for me :-) Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz

Re: [css-d] IE and Sliding Doors image replacement - flashing imagesproblem

d OK all the way back out. After you reload the page the flicker should have vanished. This is mentioned in the notes to Sliding Doors 2, BTW: <http://www.alistapart.com/articles/slidingdoors2/> HTH, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ _

Re: [css-d] #idname.classname - IE Support

x27;ll have to find a workaround if IE6-Win is important to you (which I assume it is :-) HTH, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-

Re: [css-d] database tabular data

. After all, that's what they're for; they're only evil when used for just about any purpose other than yours :-) Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] htt

Re: [css-d] symmetry: Horizontal centering divs

l me I am overlooking something. > Published today, at Drew McLellan's "24 ways to impress your friends": "Centered Tabs with CSS by Ethan Marcotte. Enjoy! <http://24ways.org/advent/centered-tabs-with-css> Regards, N

Re: [css-d] Problem (?) with img border inside a:link in Firefox

) and IE (Win and Mac, IIRC) there is a default border on images within links, apparently to maintain compatibility with the behaviour of browsers back to Netscape 2 and IE 3 (and probably even earlier). Adding a img { border-style: none; } should fix things. HTH, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimon

Re: [css-d] wrapping a list around an image

image/hope it > would have no effect. > No, lists (ol, ul and dl) are defined as block level elements. Check the HTML 4 DTD: <http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/sgml/dtd.html> regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/

Re: [css-d] Weirdest IE bug I've ever seen

> Hi folks, > > Is this a known bug? I've got a colleague who has a series of DIVs as > follows: > This is the IE duplicate characters bug, described in detail at: <http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/dup-characters.html> HTH, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons

Re: [css-d] Question about EM's

7;s perfectly happy to scroll sideways; he just appreciates being able to see and read the site as nature (and the deisgner) intended. He sees the entire world through a very narrow viewport anyway, so why should he be bothered by a scrollbar? Just my 0.02GBP... Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons htt

Re: [css-d] Box Model

tever site you're on, click the link and it will display "BackCompat" for quirks mode, and "CSS1Compat" if the page is in standards mode (assuming JavaScript is enabled in the browser). This also works in Firefox (but probably not in Op

Re: [css-d] Need help with some class names

on those pages and use either #superfluous { visibility: hidden; } or #superfluous { display: none; } as appropriate. HTH, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http:/

Re: [css-d] css & fonts

is entirely down to how the browser maps real-world measurements like pt, in and cm to the output device - see the discussion of "absolute length units" at [1]. [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#length-units> Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/

Re: [css-d] Specificity Problem

nnot support multiple IDs per element. I would suggest that the lack of specific exclusion of multiple IDs per element in HTML 4.01 is an oversight in the specs. [1]<http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#h-4.10> [2]<http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/stru

Re: [css-d] Specificity Problem

And now I see your retraction (sigh). Ah well, maybe having the links in the archive will be of value if this discussion ever comes up again :-) Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss

Re: [css-d] forms vertical spacing

bly want a bit of spacing, adjust the 0 to suit (e.g. 0.25em). Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http

Re: [css-d] Doctype and CSS

. [1] <http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/#recommendations> [2] <http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/sgml/loosedtd.html> [3] <http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/sgml/dtd.html> [4] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-20040204/#dt-doctype> [5] <http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Liberty%21_Equality%21

Re: [css-d] htc and other css drop down nightmares

htc which ought to do it. (I don't have a server at hand to test on, but it looks about right.) A longer term solution is to modify server.conf; speak to the web server administrator about that. I'll stop now as this is distinctly off topic for the list, HTH, Nick.

Re: [css-d] IE6 Handling of Margins In Floated DIVs

the > margin (with or without padding or borders) IE needs more container > width. > Dan, There's a good chance you're seeing the IE doubled float margin bug, described (with workaround) at: <http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/doubled-margin.html>

Re: [css-d] Broken border in IE and Mac browser check

> Regarding the following: > "How could you do this? AFAIK IE7b2 isn't out yet..." > > I beg to differ > http://www.newsvine.com/_news/2006/01/23/67996-windows-ie7-beta-leaked-14-new-screenshots Forwarding a link to an invitation-only site isn't actually that helpful... unless you were invitin

Re: [css-d] [how to] tr background-image or block inheritance ?

means the cell should remain as a , because it is a table data cell. Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-

Re: [css-d] Inconsistent unordered list

at your code is valid can help you catch errors like this; see <http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=CodeValidation> in the list wiki. HTH, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [css-d] lte IE 6 - correct coding?

http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/01/31/520817.aspx [3] http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/10/12/480242.aspx regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-d

Re: [css-d] IE7 Beta goes Public

have stuff get zoomed on future browsers which support it (or on IE), so zoom it by a factor of 1. In other words, replace height: 1%; with zoom: 1; and all will be well. (Well, it is for me...) HTH, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/

Re: [css-d] IE7b2 horizontal scrollbar due to position:relative onnon-layout element

> http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/ie7b2_prscrollbar.html > > This bug is new, I think, > > Can anyone please confirm in IE7b2, the fix in IE7b2, and the absence of > the bug in IE6? > Looks OK (i.e. no scrollbar) on IE6, Win 2k Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http

Re: [css-d] IE 7 and max-width?

uot;Working around overflow:visible default behavior") [2] <http://msdn.microsoft.com/ie/> -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listi

Re: [css-d] Is there a CSS hack png transparency?

thod='crop'); } #imageContainer img { filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Alpha(opacity=0); } which makes the image 100% transparent, allowing the pseudo-background-image applied to the containing element to show through. I really must write all thi

Re: [css-d] How close is MS from releasing IE7?

n by somebody with no inside knowledge, and is therefore worthless. Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7

Re: [css-d] No scrollbar at all in IE

t is longer than the window there is no scrollbar at all. Sounds like the unscrollable content bug: <http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/unscrollable.html> HTH, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ c

Re: [css-d] vertical stretch .. just can't get it - ALMOST GOT IT

elieve me, I've seen the consequences of that mistake, and you don't want to make it. [Ref. 1] <http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/dhtml/overview/ccomment_ovw.asp> Regards, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ _

Re: [css-d] Any good sites about font sizes?

in reality, rather than the ideal world of their monitors. HTH, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http

Re: [css-d] IE Repeating Text

see, there aren't enough comments/hidden elements etc. in your page to cause the PiE bug. HTH, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinf

Re: [css-d] Any tricks to get IE:mac to refresh?

otocol (which I presume is what you mean). I always do my development using http, and I had the same issues with IE-Mac. For images, one trick is to use the "View image" (or whatever it says) context menu item, then force a proper reload, then hit the back but

Re: [css-d] Evil CMS generated IDs

ail clients don't mistake the (bracketed) stuff in the previous paragraph for smileys; the images displayed could be horrendous...) [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/types.html#type-id> [2] <http://www.bea.com/framework.jsp?CNT=index.htm&FP=/content/products/weblogic> HTH, Nick.

Re: [css-d] CSS image rollover - IE 6?

tell, as I don't know of any way to > resolve it. > This happens on developers' machines but normal people don't see it. See <http://archivist.incutio.com/viewlist/css-discuss/66818> in the list archives. Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ _

Re: [css-d] CSS image rollover - IE 6?

> Nick Fitzsimons wrote: >>> Mikhail Bozgounov wrote: >>>> Just a general question concerning CSS rollovers: >>>> >>>> You remember, that in *some cases* IE tries to download a CSS >>>> image background EVERY TIME you mouse over the link

Re: [css-d] CSS image rollover - IE 6?

> Oops, spoke too soon. Indeed, the effect is gone when I set my IE > to check for new versions of pages on "automatic". So, all those > people causing these many lines in my log were developers? > Possible I guess. > > Thanks for the explanation, and sorry for the too quick reply :-) > > -- > Els

Re: [css-d] IE7 hovers and a IE vertical list bug?

r the high-traffic, non-technical commercial site I'm currently working on. If IE5/Win is important to you (which your site's user agent stats can tell you) then go for the traditional Holly Hack with "height: 1%;" and use conditional comments to make su

Re: [css-d] IE (6?) Border Bug

nd I'm still at work ;-) But seriously, do persevere; I must have spent a couple of years really getting my head round CSS, but finally I can (most days) get it to do what I want. Best of luck, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ ___

Re: [css-d] IE (6?) Border Bug

Oh, I should point out that the "clear: both;" in the .myBit rule was just to get my stuff on a level playing field beneath your bit; if you want to float several such boxes next to each other, you'll want to remove it: > > .myBit { > clear: both; <-- You probably don't want this ___

Re: [css-d] Problem with content left alignment in IE Win

/blankGSA_template/links/index.htm > Sounds like the IE 3 pixel text jog: <http://positioniseverything.net/explorer/threepxtest.html> HTH, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAI

Re: [css-d] Styling Lists

check?verbose=1&uri=http://www.adl-bp.co.uk/home/] should point you to the answer: you are using "li" where you apparently meant "div" on your "search" section. HTH, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ ___

Re: [css-d] Mozilla - limited hover area on linked image

display as block anyway, so there's no need to explicitly add that. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 test

Re: [css-d] IE 7 Beta - Partial Hiding of List Item Text

view-of-mix06-release/> have already shown that it fixes a large number of the problems people are reporting in the Beta Preview. So don't worry about it. Just send your bug report via one of the mechanisms described on the IE Team blog: <http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/01/31

Re: [css-d] footerStickAlt

ounds so many, I don't see any redundancy myself. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-disc

Re: [css-d] footerStickAlt

ght: 100%; } #nonFooter { position: relative; min-height: 100%; } * html #nonFooter { height: 100%; } #footer { position: relative; margin-top: -7.5em; } which seems like a pretty simple template with layout CSS and no element styling :-) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick F

Re: [css-d] footerStickAlt

m; background-color: #600; height: 7.5em; } HTH, Nick. -- Nick Fitzsimons http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/ __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incuti

  1   2   >