Re: [css-d] transparent divs

2007-04-24 Thread Barney Carroll
Ross Hulford wrote: > Hello, > > This works in FF- > > filter:alpha(opacity=60); >-moz-opacity: 0.6; >opacity: 0.6; > > Is it valid? > > Although it doesn't work in IE. Is there an ie transparency property that > validates? > > R. Ross, 'opacity' is a valid property and the

Re: [css-d] transparent divs

2007-04-24 Thread Simon White
> * Ross Hulford wrote: > >This works in FF- > > > >filter:alpha(opacity=60); > > -moz-opacity: 0.6; > > opacity: 0.6; > > > >Is it valid? > > No, in order to be valid, style sheets must exclude > properties that start with a "-" and other proprietary and > experimental properties li

Re: [css-d] transparent divs

2007-04-24 Thread Jukka K. Korpela
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Ross Hulford wrote: > filter:alpha(opacity=60); > -moz-opacity: 0.6; > opacity: 0.6; > > Is it valid? It depends on what you mean by "valid". There is no technical definition for "valid" in the CSS context (as there is in SGML, HTML, and XML contexts). If "valid" means

Re: [css-d] transparent divs

2007-04-24 Thread Bjoern Hoehrmann
* Ross Hulford wrote: >This works in FF- > >filter:alpha(opacity=60); > -moz-opacity: 0.6; > opacity: 0.6; > >Is it valid? No, in order to be valid, style sheets must exclude properties that start with a "-" and other proprietary and experimental properties like 'filter'. >Although it

[css-d] transparent divs

2007-04-23 Thread Ross Hulford
Hello, This works in FF- filter:alpha(opacity=60); -moz-opacity: 0.6; opacity: 0.6; Is it valid? Although it doesn't work in IE. Is there an ie transparency property that validates? R. __ css-discuss [EMAIL PRO