Ross Hulford wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This works in FF-
>
> filter:alpha(opacity=60);
>-moz-opacity: 0.6;
>opacity: 0.6;
>
> Is it valid?
>
> Although it doesn't work in IE. Is there an ie transparency property that
> validates?
>
> R.
Ross, 'opacity' is a valid property and the
> * Ross Hulford wrote:
> >This works in FF-
> >
> >filter:alpha(opacity=60);
> > -moz-opacity: 0.6;
> > opacity: 0.6;
> >
> >Is it valid?
>
> No, in order to be valid, style sheets must exclude
> properties that start with a "-" and other proprietary and
> experimental properties li
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Ross Hulford wrote:
> filter:alpha(opacity=60);
> -moz-opacity: 0.6;
> opacity: 0.6;
>
> Is it valid?
It depends on what you mean by "valid". There is no technical definition
for "valid" in the CSS context (as there is in SGML, HTML, and XML
contexts). If "valid" means
* Ross Hulford wrote:
>This works in FF-
>
>filter:alpha(opacity=60);
> -moz-opacity: 0.6;
> opacity: 0.6;
>
>Is it valid?
No, in order to be valid, style sheets must exclude properties that
start with a "-" and other proprietary and experimental properties
like 'filter'.
>Although it
Hello,
This works in FF-
filter:alpha(opacity=60);
-moz-opacity: 0.6;
opacity: 0.6;
Is it valid?
Although it doesn't work in IE. Is there an ie transparency property that
validates?
R.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PRO