Erik Visser wrote:
> so there is:
>
> em-liquid ( no max / min width? )
- From the name/description: it is "fixed to em" and not liquid at all,
but it is possible to add min / max width so the layout doesn't go
completely crazy when subjected to a bit more extreme font resizing.
> em-f
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
>>> I can't easily read text smaller than that on my screens. I design
>>> for 200% font-resizing, or 32px 'minimum font size', in case
>>> someone needs even larger text. You should try that.
>
>> done! the whole thing is now a liquid layout. dropped all those
>> pixels and
>> I can't easily read text smaller than that on my screens. I design
>> for 200% font-resizing, or 32px 'minimum font size', in case
>> someone needs even larger text. You should try that.
> done! the whole thing is now a liquid layout. dropped all those
> pixels and changed it to ems. please ta
On 12/15/06, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I can't easily read text smaller than that on my screens.
> I design for 200% font-resizing, or 32px 'minimum font size', in case
> someone needs even larger text. You should try that.
done! the whole thing is now a liquid layout. dropp
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
> Rizky wrote:
>
>
>>> FYI: I use a tuned version of HTML Tidy to "clean up" any
>>> unnecessary spacing, indentation and whatever in the source-code,
>>> which gives me a pretty small file-size without any compression.
>>>
>
>
>> is it available for public u
Rizky wrote:
> i think the problem was on my code.
>
> the bottom grid now is inside a new container div. previously, it was
> under the same parent div with the top grid. that was the real
> reason i was forced to use negative margins in the first place.
Fine. Correct nesting wasn't one of the
On 12/14/06, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> For the page in question; add...
> #featured {position: relative;}
> ...to fix the "faulty element-stacking over the edge of an element with
> 'Layout'" bug in IE6 and older versions. That'll fix it.
i think the problem was on my code.
>> http://kometdigital.web.id/portfolio/
>> the problematic section is at the bottom row. the one under the
>> title "fenomena el nano."
> Negative margins don't work in older versions IE on floated elements.
Correction:
Negative margins on floats work just fine in older versions of IE/win.
Ho
Rizky wrote:
> here's the url: http://kometdigital.web.id/portfolio/
> the problematic section is at the bottom row. the one under the title
> "fenomena el nano."
>
> here's the css:
> http://static.kometdigital.web.id/mt-static/themes/portfolio_theme/portfolio_theme.css
>
> the section with negati
On 12/14/06, Rizky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> here's the url: http://kometdigital.web.id/portfolio/
> the problematic section is at the bottom row. the one under the title
> "fenomena el nano."
>
> here's the css:
>
> http://static.kometdigital.web.id/mt-static/themes/portfolio_theme/portfolio_
here's the url: http://kometdigital.web.id/portfolio/
the problematic section is at the bottom row. the one under the title
"fenomena el nano."
here's the css:
http://static.kometdigital.web.id/mt-static/themes/portfolio_theme/portfolio_theme.css
the section with negative margin is div#featured.
11 matches
Mail list logo
