Jeff Blaine wrote:
> Interesting. I wish I understood why 'overflow: hidden' solves the
> problem. I don't like adding things that I don't fully understand.
> What overflow am I hiding? Why is 'overflow: hidden' the magic that
> states, "these children belong to the enclosing div". It just seem
Jeff Blaine wrote:
> Basic test case: http://www.kickflop.net/div-problem.html
>
> I'm clearly missing something simple here. I want 'bot1',
> 'bot2', and 'bot3' to be 3 bordered divs INSIDE 'bottomrow'
>
> Any suggestions would be great.
>
>
"Children in hand" are always welcome (regardless
On Apr 29, 2008, at 8:21 AM, Jeff Blaine wrote:
> Interesting. I wish I understood why 'overflow: hidden'
> solves the problem. I don't like adding things that I
> don't fully understand. What overflow am I hiding? Why
> is 'overflow: hidden' the magic that states, "these
> children belong to
Interesting. I wish I understood why 'overflow: hidden'
solves the problem. I don't like adding things that I
don't fully understand. What overflow am I hiding? Why
is 'overflow: hidden' the magic that states, "these
children belong to the enclosing div". It just seems
awful obtuse to me.
Cur
Afternoon all
> Jeff Blaine wrote:
>> Basic test case: http://www.kickflop.net/div-problem.html
>>
>>
>>
>> Any suggestions would be great.
>>
David L wrote
>
>
> #bottomrow { overflow:hidden;/*add to sector*/}
>
>
> html
>
> wrap the line "inside bottomrow div. Notice bot1 bot2 and bot3 are not
Jeff Blaine wrote:
> Basic test case: http://www.kickflop.net/div-problem.html
>
>
>
> Any suggestions would be great.
>
#bottomrow { overflow:hidden;/*add to sector*/}
html
wrap the line "inside bottomrow div. Notice bot1 bot2 and bot3 are not
inside this bordered box!" in an empty divisi
Basic test case: http://www.kickflop.net/div-problem.html
I'm clearly missing something simple here. I want 'bot1',
'bot2', and 'bot3' to be 3 bordered divs INSIDE 'bottomrow'
Any suggestions would be great.
__
css-discuss [EMAI
