Suzanne Bernard wrote:
>> I'd appreciate it if anyone who has time could look at
>> http://www.nycss.org/ and tell me why the font sizes are so different
>> in IE6 and Firefox.
>>
>
>
>
> Suzanne Bernard
>
>
>
This is a valid markup version of your file (thanks to Tidy On-line). I
did not
On 2007/04/15 14:28 (GMT-0400) Suzanne Bernard apparently typed:
>> I'd appreciate it if anyone who has time could look at
>> http://www.nycss.org/ and tell me why the font sizes are so different
>> in IE6 and Firefox.
Did you recently change computers? Do you test on more than one? If so, are
th
From: "Suzanne Bernard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> http://www.nycss.org/
>I've changed the Doctype to 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/
> TR/html4/strict.dtd"> as suggested by Georg and Philippe and it hasn't
>appeared to fix the problem. And the results at
>http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www
> I'd appreciate it if anyone who has time could look at
> http://www.nycss.org/ and tell me why the font sizes are so different
> in IE6 and Firefox.
I've changed the Doctype to http://www.w3.org/
TR/html4/strict.dtd"> as suggested by Gunlaug and Philippe and it hasn't
appeared to fix the probl
Del Wegener wrote:
> I am pretty new at css, but aren't font sizes controlled by an item on the
> View menu of each of the browsers in question.
Yes, they are.
Browsers' font resizing option(s) are always a potential cause for
differences, so that's a very timely reminder.
FWIW: none of my bro
David Dorward wrote:
> If by "pass" you mean "Fails to recognise the non-standard public
> identifier, warns about not knowing if it should be treating this as
> XML or SGML[1], uses the URI to the DTD instead of its local catalog
> for HTML 4.01 Strict, and then validates against that".
>
> [1] T
> I'd appreciate it if anyone who has time could look at
> http://www.nycss.org/ and tell me why the font sizes are so different in
> IE6 and Firefox. >This was not the case last time I checked, and I can't
> figure out what I've inadvertently changed to cause this (I want them both
> in the
On 15/04/07, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > DTD HTML 4.01 Strict//EN
> > to
> > DTD HTML 4.01//EN
> Browsers seem to be happy switching to "standard mode" for both variants
> AFAICS, and the validator also gives them both a pass.
If by "pass" you mean "Fails to recognise the non-s
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
> should be
> http://www.w3.org/
> TR/html4/strict.dtd">
>
> from
> DTD HTML 4.01 Strict//EN
> to
> DTD HTML 4.01//EN
Is that just for the sake of following "recommendations"[1], or is there
a flaw in our knowledge about browsers "mode switching"[2] ?
Browsers seem
On Apr 15, 2007, at 4:44 AM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
>"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4.01/strict.dtd";>
>
> The correct would be:
> "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd";>
should be
http://www.w3.org/
TR/html4/strict.dtd">
from
DTD HTML 4.01 Strict//EN
to
DTD HTML 4.01//EN
Philippe
---
Philipp
Suzanne Bernard wrote:
> I'd appreciate it if anyone who has time could look at
> http://www.nycss.org/ and tell me why the font sizes are so different
> in IE6 and Firefox.
It wouldn't surprise me if the doctype declaration throws IE6 off - back
into quirks mode.
You have:
http://www.w3.org/TR/
I'd appreciate it if anyone who has time could look at http://www.nycss.org/
and tell me why the font sizes are so different in IE6 and Firefox. This was
not the case last time I checked, and I can't figure out what I've
inadvertently changed to cause this (I want them both in the smaller size).
12 matches
Mail list logo
