Re: [css-d] Site check-- Phoebe Taylor

On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:49:17 -0400 David Laakso wrote: > Phoebe Taylor wrote: > >> re: > >> > >> > >> > > > > Sure, I'd be up for it. :) > > > > Just let me know what the challenge is... > > > > > > > > > > Phoebe > > > > OK. Some random CSS suggestions. >

Re: [css-d] Site check-- Phoebe Taylor

Phoebe Taylor wrote: > re: http://www.cgraytaylor.net/ > > >> >> > > In general, using the shorthand in my code has been a good thing, but > seems to be conditional too. Like trying to put bold in the { font: > 125% #000 bold } seems to make the text less bold than it is if it is > on

Re: [css-d] Site check-- Phoebe Taylor

On 2008/03/09 17:09 (GMT-0500) Phoebe Taylor apparently typed: > In general, using the shorthand in my code has been a good thing, but > seems to be conditional too. Like trying to put bold in the { font: > 125% #000 bold } seems to make the text less bold than it is if it is > on a tag line by

Re: [css-d] Site check-- Phoebe Taylor

re: http://www.cgraytaylor.net > The addition of: > html { min-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 1px; } > to the CSS file may help the "short page shift."(if it even bothers you, > or your client-- it drives me nuts but I'm a little whacked anyway) [1] Okay, I like this. I didn't notice the 'sho

Re: [css-d] Site check-- Phoebe Taylor

Phoebe Taylor wrote: >> re: >> >> >> > > Sure, I'd be up for it. :) > > Just let me know what the challenge is... > > > > > Phoebe > OK. Some random CSS suggestions. First off, you have done exceptionally well with CSS. Please accept this, not as criticism