On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Keith Purtell <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Because, long ago when I started with CSS, someone I thought was a guru
> told me I had to do it that way to accommodate several browsers. At that
> time, it may have been true. I will make the change you have
Well, I'm not sure if their recommendation was grounded
in fact, but it does look as though the memory of what
they actually proposed must have faded with the years,
because :
Because, long ago when I started with CSS, someone I thought was a guru
told me I had to do it that way to accommodate several browsers. At that
time, it may have been true. I will make the change you have suggested
and move on to the matter of placing images correctly.
> Why not try the alternati
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 05:53:28 +0100, Keith Purtell
wrote:
> Well, the validator was a huge help. Two problems I ran into:
>
> 1- It did not like the way I imported my style sheet. I thought my tag
>
> was correct, but the validator choked on both the @ and the ;
>
> 2-I tried just pasting in my
Why not try the alternative :
Philip Taylor
Keith Purtell wrote:
> Well, the validator was a huge help. Two problems I ran into:
>
> 1- It did not like the way I imported my style sheet. I thought my tag
>
Well, the validator was a huge help. Two problems I ran into:
1- It did not like the way I imported my style sheet. I thought my tag
I noticed that the answers I got to this were the exact same ones that I
posted in the Adobe Dreamweaver forum. If the same people are giving me
the same answers, I suppose I can quit posting to the Dreamweaver forum,
and save myself the trouble of deleting the large number of individual
emails it
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 04:35:09 +0100, Keith Purtell
wrote:
> I want to diagnose problems on this page. One at a time; I don't want
> all the answers to every flaw you see ... I want to work and try to
> figure out most of this myself. Please ignore the attempted fly-out
> navigation links at top
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Keith Purtell <
[email protected]> wrote:
> I want to diagnose problems on this page. One at a time; I don't want
> all the answers to every flaw you see ... I want to work and try to
> figure out most of this myself. Please ignore the attempted fly-ou
I want to diagnose problems on this page. One at a time; I don't want
all the answers to every flaw you see ... I want to work and try to
figure out most of this myself. Please ignore the attempted fly-out
navigation links at top left for now (I'm looking at this in FireFox by
the way).
What about
10 matches
Mail list logo
