Re: [css-d] css validation error

> Le 1 juil. 2015 à 02:59, Mike Manley a écrit : > > All css validates except this part. > "css error = Unknown pseudo-element or pseudo-class :required" > … > > In the css I have this > input:required, textarea:required{add styles} > > From all the information I have been able to find (which i

Re: [css-d] css validation error

Ryan Reese wrote: > The validator basically doesn't know that it's valid CSS. It's not > updated. Ignore the error :). It might be helpful, Ryan, if you could provide a link to the relevant part of the W3C CSS specification(s); that way, both the original poster and other members of the list

Re: [css-d] css validation error

The validator basically doesn't know that it's valid CSS. It's not updated. Ignore the error :). On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Mike Manley wrote: > I need a little help understanding this error. > > All css validates except this part. > "css error = Unknown pseudo-element or pseudo-class :req

[css-d] css validation error

I need a little help understanding this error. All css validates except this part. "css error = Unknown pseudo-element or pseudo-class :required" I have this html in a table for a contact form and all html validates. required="required" /> In the css I have this input:required, textarea:requi

Re: [css-d] CSS Validation Error ?

URL ? Crest Christopher wrote: Hi, I need help with a CSS error __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- h

[css-d] CSS Validation Error ?

Hi, I need help with a CSS error Value Error : margin attempt to find a semi-colon before the property name. add it The error is a closed semi-colon for a MQ ? __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discus

Re: [css-d] css validation help

Alan Gresley wrote: > > I > have been influenced by Georg and his masterpiece. > > http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_1_02_01.html > > > > Indeed. Interesting fellow, Georg: On feeding styles to Redmond... (works for me)

Re: [css-d] css validation help

Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > Just 2 notes on this: > > On Jul 17, 2009, at 3:29 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: > >> I would not recommend >> hacking your HTML with IE Conditional comments since they are not in one >> location and thus not easily removed. > > > 1. If your website is larger than 3 p

Re: [css-d] css validation help

david wrote: > Alan Gresley wrote: [...] >> Hello Erik, >> >> This is still hacking HTML for IE7 or lower due to lack of support for >> CSS2.1. My CSS and hacks are *centralized* as oppose to being >> *decentralized* in the HTML. They can be removed in a flash. > > All your conditional comment (

Re: [css-d] css validation help

Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > Just 2 notes on this: > > On Jul 17, 2009, at 3:29 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: > > >> I would not recommend >> hacking your HTML with IE Conditional comments since they are not in >> one >> location and thus not easily removed. >> > > > 1. If your website is larg

Re: [css-d] css validation help

Just 2 notes on this: On Jul 17, 2009, at 3:29 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: > I would not recommend > hacking your HTML with IE Conditional comments since they are not in > one > location and thus not easily removed. 1. If your website is larger than 3 pages and reuses the same stylesheets, I h

Re: [css-d] css validation help

Alan Gresley wrote: > Erik Vorhes wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Alan Gresley wrote: >>> The best way is to only hack IE7 or lower since all modern browsers >>> (including IE8) should render a page the same way. I would not recommend >>> hacking your HTML with IE Conditional comments si

Re: [css-d] css validation help

Erik Vorhes wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Alan Gresley wrote: >> The best way is to only hack IE7 or lower since all modern browsers >> (including IE8) should render a page the same way. I would not recommend >> hacking your HTML with IE Conditional comments since they are not in one >>

Re: [css-d] css validation help

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Alan Gresley wrote: > > The best way is to only hack IE7 or lower since all modern browsers > (including IE8) should render a page the same way. I would not recommend > hacking your HTML with IE Conditional comments since they are not in one > location and thus not

Re: [css-d] css validation help

Vincent Pollard wrote: > Hi everybody, > > So my css and xhtml almost validate, except for two things: > > > > 1) The third line here validates in CSS3 but not in CSS2.1 - > > a) does that matter? Erik Vorhes has already stated that it doesn't matter. > b) the overflow-y is the only

Re: [css-d] css validation help

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Vincent Pollard wrote: > > 1)      The third line here validates in CSS3 but not in CSS2.1 - > > a) does that matter? > Not really, since you're doing it intentionally, and you'd run into that issue with anything that's valid in CSS3 but not in CSS2.1. > > I didn'

[css-d] css validation help

Hi everybody, So my css and xhtml almost validate, except for two things: 1) The third line here validates in CSS3 but not in CSS2.1 - a) does that matter? b) the overflow-y is the only way I've found to stop the page jumping around in IE8. Maybe somebody else has a better solution?

Re: [css-d] css validation error

The html validator indicates a BOM in addition -- http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html http://www.dolphinsback.com __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-disc

Re: [css-d] css validation error

Sr. Flo Fluse wrote: > I'm at validating the css stylesheet and there are two strange error > messages which i can't get rid of. > > > flo > > Wow! Uncompressing the file before posting to the list would be a nice touch on your part... I think if you delete the entire comment preceding the

Re: [css-d] css validation error

> I'm at validating the css stylesheet and there are two strange > error messages which i can't get rid of. What are you using to edit your CSS file? The file appears to have non-printing characters that do not appear to be standard CR, LF, or CR/LF line endings. What if you copy/paste your CSS

[css-d] css validation error

Hello all, I'm at validating the css stylesheet and there are two strange error messages which i can't get rid of. 1)the first one is: /Parse Error - body, div, dl, dt, dd, ul, ol, li, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, pre, form, fieldset, input, p, blockquote, th, td { margin:0; padding:0; } /This li

Re: [css-d] CSS validation warnings question

On 8/8/07, Brian Cummiskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Terri Chicko wrote: > > It says my CSS validates but I have 22 warnings all similar. Sorry, I > > know these are dumb... but I don't understand. > > > > Warning > > "Same colors for color and background-color in two contexts #headline > > and

Re: [css-d] CSS validation warnings question

Terri Chicko wrote: > It says my CSS validates but I have 22 warnings all similar. Sorry, I > know these are dumb... but I don't understand. > > Warning > "Same colors for color and background-color in two contexts #headline > and h1" > Thanks > Terri > This means you have a background color

[css-d] CSS validation warnings question

It says my CSS validates but I have 22 warnings all similar. Sorry, I know these are dumb... but I don't understand. Warning "Same colors for color and background-color in two contexts #headline and h1" Thanks Terri Terri Chicko Flirty Women's Fashions www.hotniniz.com ___

Re: [css-d] CSS Validation Error: Content is not allowed in prolog.

On 2/6/07, Peter Hyde-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Google gives, http://www.ozzu.com/ftopic68872.html > > It may be you browser or text editor that's causing the problem. > > Cheers, > > Peter > www.fatpawdesign.com Wonderful. Changed encoding in Notepad++ to UTF-8 without BOM. Everything

Re: [css-d] CSS Validation Error: Content is not allowed in prolog.

- Original Message - From: "Blake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi guys, > > I just got a very strange CSS error when validating > . > > The CSS Validator comes up with the following error: > >Target: http://www.blakehaswell.com/blog/ >Please, va

[css-d] CSS Validation Error: Content is not allowed in prolog.

Hi guys, I just got a very strange CSS error when validating . The CSS Validator comes up with the following error: Target: http://www.blakehaswell.com/blog/ Please, validate your XML document first! Line 1 Column 1 C

Re: [css-d] CSS Validation error

On 1/2/07, Mike NA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lexical error at line 1, column 3. Encountered: "D" (68), after : "http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org --

Re: [css-d] CSS Validation error

~davidLaakso wrote: > Mike NA wrote: > >> I am getting this error message when I try to vadidate my CSS... >> >> Lexical error at line 1, column 3. Encountered: "D" (68), after : "> > > Whoops. Or is it, simply: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";> http://www.w3.or

Re: [css-d] CSS Validation error

Mike NA wrote: > Hello > > I am getting this error message when I try to vadidate my CSS... > > Lexical error at line 1, column 3. Encountered: "D" (68), after : " > The actual code is > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";> > http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";> > Michael

Re: [css-d] CSS Validation error

On 03/01/07, Mike NA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > I am getting this error message when I try to vadidate my CSS... > > Lexical error at line 1, column 3. Encountered: "D" (68), after : " > The actual code is > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";> > http://ww

[css-d] CSS Validation error

Hello I am getting this error message when I try to vadidate my CSS... Lexical error at line 1, column 3. Encountered: "D" (68), after : "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";> I have tried changing document types as suggested this web address

Re: [css-d] CSS validation

* Bob Meetin wrote: >I'm trying to get a slideshow (uses microsoft fade) to pass CSS >validation. That's not possible, if you use the Microsoft 'filter' property, your style sheet is not valid per any CSS specification. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de We

[css-d] CSS validation

I'm trying to get a slideshow (uses microsoft fade) to pass CSS validation. The validator says: * Line: 190 attempt to find a semi-colon before the property name. add it * Line: 190 Property progid doesn't exist : DXImageTransform The code: Th

Re: [css-d] CSS validation question

> When validating css at http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/, do you want to > include the web site URL (like you'd pull up in a browser) or the URL for > the css stylesheet itself? Either or will work. I checked both of them and both give you the same colour warnings, which can be safely ignored

[css-d] CSS validation question

When validating css at http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/, do you want to include the web site URL (like you'd pull up in a browser) or the URL for the css stylesheet itself? For example: http://www.matthickerson.com/recent/barley Returns a bunch of color errors, which don't make a lot of sens

Re: [css-d] CSS validation question

> why this is not only an accessibility question. It's more a reminder than anything else. The "validator" (a "syntax checker" would be better?) has no idea about you cascade and CSS inheritance in the particular document so it advises you to add more maybe even duplicate values to just satisfy

Re: [css-d] CSS validation question

Ingo Chao wrote: >francky wrote: > > >>The css-validator loves to see pairs >>of colors and background colors. ... The ratio of this is in short: be aware >>that the >>contrast between the letter colors and the background is enough for >>accessibility at each level. >> >> >Jukka "Yucca"

Re: [css-d] CSS validation question

francky wrote: > The css-validator loves to see pairs > of colors and background colors. ... The ratio of this is in short: be aware > that the > contrast between the letter colors and the background is enough for > accessibility at each level. Jukka "Yucca" Korpela wrote an excellent experti

Re: [css-d] CSS validation question

Peggy Coats wrote: >When I'm validating my CSS, I keep getting warnings such as listed below >using the W3C validation service: > > - Line : 5 (Level : 1) You have no color with your background-color : > body > - Line : 11 (Level : 1) You have no color with your background-color : > #conte

Re: [css-d] CSS validation question

Hi Peggy, Can you send a link to the page? Riva Peggy Coats wrote: > When I'm validating my CSS, I keep getting warnings such as listed below > using the W3C validation service: > > >- Line : 5 (Level : 1) You have no color with your background-color : >body >- Line : 11 (Level : 1)

[css-d] CSS validation question

When I'm validating my CSS, I keep getting warnings such as listed below using the W3C validation service: - Line : 5 (Level : 1) You have no color with your background-color : body - Line : 11 (Level : 1) You have no color with your background-color : #content - Line : 29 (Level :

Re: [css-d] CSS validation tool question

On 19/04/06, Terri Chicko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However when I went to validate the CSS it's OK but I don't > understand these warnings. > What am I doing or not doing? > Line : 12 (Level : 1) You have no color with your background-color : > #strip #strip { background-color: black; } On

[css-d] CSS validation tool question

Hi All I can't believe this but I think I most of the bugs, glitches and other problems are worked out on this site! Thank you all for helping. However when I went to validate the CSS it's OK but I don't understand these warnings. What am I doing or not doing? Warnings URI : http://www.jung

Re: [css-d] CSS Validation

At 07:56 PM 26/10/2005, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: Vicki Stebbins wrote: For me, I'll now include in my written estimate of a job, a clause which says something about 'warnings' in validation services just to cover all avenues. If you come up with a good text then let me know - off list, I guess.

Re: [css-d] CSS Validation

Vicki Stebbins wrote: For me, I'll now include in my written estimate of a job, a clause which says something about 'warnings' in validation services just to cover all avenues. If you come up with a good text then let me know - off list, I guess. Clients are often worse than the validator abou

Re: [css-d] CSS Validation

At 10:38 PM 25/10/2005, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: Nick Fitzsimons wrote: Frankly, it's a pretty useless warning in most cases. It would be better to describe it as a hint: "Make sure you're really doing what you wanted to do, and if you are, ignore this." IMO: the same can be said about all [err

Re: [css-d] CSS Validation

Nick Fitzsimons wrote: Frankly, it's a pretty useless warning in most cases. It would be better to describe it as a hint: "Make sure you're really doing what you wanted to do, and if you are, ignore this." IMO: the same can be said about all [error] and [warning] messages. If you know what you

Re: [css-d] CSS Validation

> The answer to put a background color into everything doesn't quite work > for > me, when I get the error: > 'You have no background-color with your color : p ' Note that it isn't an error: it's just a warning. Try introducing some non-valid CSS into a stylesheet, then validate it: the invalid b

Re: [css-d] CSS Validation

Many thanks Christian, It's certainly off-putting when the pages showed without the warnings and then suddenly, boom! David sent a link to a previous post which I hadn't received explaining the warnings. Now I've gone through them and yes you are quite right, about the warnings and my CSS

Re: [css-d] CSS Validation

> The answer to put a background color into everything doesn't quite work for > me, when I get the error: > 'You have no background-color with your color : p ' > Vicki, that's not an error, it's a warning. And warnings do not mean that your page doesn't validate. To be more specific, that particu

Re: [css-d] CSS Validation

At 11:37 AM 25/10/2005, David Laakso wrote: Vicki Stebbins wrote: Can someone tell me have they changed the validator? Vicki Vicki, There have been numerous posts and replies regarding the questions you've asked over the past 14days. Presumptuous of me, I know, but check this months archiv

Re: [css-d] CSS Validation

Vicki Stebbins wrote: At 11:37 AM 25/10/2005, David Laakso wrote: Vicki Stebbins wrote: Can someone tell me have they changed the validator? Vicki Vicki, There have been numerous posts and replies regarding the questions you've asked over the past 14days. Presumptuous of me, I know, but

Re: [css-d] CSS Validation

Vicki Stebbins wrote: Can someone tell me have they changed the validator? Vicki Vicki, There have been numerous posts and replies regarding the questions you've asked over the past 14days. Presumptuous of me, I know, but check this months archives. ~dL -- David Laakso http://www.dlaakso.

[css-d] CSS Validation

Hi all, I've just gone to http://jigsaw.w3.org to validate the CSS for the latest site I'm doing and I got a heap of warnings, so I then went to previous domains that hadn't had the warnings to find they now do as well. Mainly it's to do with the background-color: which I have as part of bac

Re: [css-d] CSS validation error in Line 1

Karen Dec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Parse Error - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "UTF-8"; My CSS starts with: @charset "UTF-8"; Your text editor is not showing you everything that's actually in the file. There are three high bytes before the @charset, and the validator doesn't like it. Those thr

Re: [css-d] CSS validation error in Line 1

d use BBEdit which adds in the Doctype automatically, but I believe it should be: David From: Karen Dec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 20:45:48 -0400 To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Subject: [css-d] CSS validation error in Line 1 I ran my CSS through the W3C validation and I

[css-d] CSS validation error in Line 1

I ran my CSS through the W3C validation and I was able to fix everything but 1 error that I don't understand. Here is the error message: Line: 1 Context : ??? Parse Error - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "UTF-8"; My CSS starts with: @charset "UTF-8"; Is that not correct? Any enlightenment on this would