uss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.30
between TDs in different rows within a single table?
Off-list replies on this please!
Thanks. Sorry if I disturbed you!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
Thanks Philippe. I'll dig in to this.
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 7:59 PM Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
> > On Jul 24, 2017, at 10:57 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> >
> > I'm still new to grid (and flex, for that matter). I have a sample
> > page where an indiv
Listers,
I'm still new to grid (and flex, for that matter). I have a sample
page where an individual flex item squeezes responsively as I want,
but when it is inside a css grid container, it stops.
https://tomliv.com/flex-in-grid/
Why do they not squeeze up inside the grid?
TIA
--
Ow, my head.
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:20 PM Eric A. Meyer wrote:
> On 21 Jul 2017, at 14:18, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to style the rows and columns of a css grid - the grid
> > itself?
>
> There's no way to say something like '@col
yet and can't find what I'm looking for in a search.
TIA
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d
another in a
slot machine style, or slide a line of text. Ultimately, we would like
it to be html text for accessibility and SEO purposes. I am having
little luck on Google but that may be my search terms.
Anyone do something like this? Any references?
Thanks in advance.
--
Tom Livingston
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Maybe this can help?
https://css-tricks.com/masking-vs-clipping-use/#more-255253
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 8:29 AM, wrote:
> No, what is defined with is called outside of and should be
> displayed ?
>
>
>
>
>
> Christopher
>
>
>
--
Tom Livingston | S
I see what looks like 2 black hourglass type shapes. Is that what you want?
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:59 PM, wrote:
> Link
>
>
>
> Christopher
>
>
>
> From: Tom Livingston
> Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 10:19 PM
> To: CSS Discussion Group; crestchristop...@g
A link or some information would help.
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:38 PM wrote:
> I understand this doesn’t belong to this discussion. Anyone with deep
> understanding of SVG because this is not displaying within CodePen ?
>
>
> Christopher
>
> --
Tom Livingston | Senio
Thanks Al. This was the hint I needed.
>>
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> I know you're very advanced in your CSS skills, so looking at the structure
>> and CSS we're deploying on our home page should give you some clues:
>> http://www.projectseven.com/
--
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Al Sparber wrote:
> On 5/22/2017 12:50 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> Given the following:
>>
>>
>> Item 1
>> Item 2
>> Item 3
>> Item 4
>>
>>
>> ol{
a taller parent, so the LIs are
taller than the text inside them.
This gets me very close to where I want to be except the text needs to
be centered vertically. What's the best way to accomplish this? Am I
missing a flex method that will do it?
Thanks
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Fron
I'll have to whip up a test page. Can't share the real page.
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
> Not without a link.
>
> Best,
> Karl
>
> Sent from losPhone
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.
Correction:
Sorry, that should have said I started down the path of *min-height*
not min-width.
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> Listers,
>
> I have a content module. A div containing text above a flexible-width
> video (could easily be an image too).
>
situation
here and can't see another easy solution.
TIA
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.c
blur, mouse over and out (on the
button).
Is it me or the browser?
Thanks
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [
need to look at their layout
> other than to see if it solved my problem.
>
> Nancy
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> > I think his breakoints aren't quite right for that 3-column layout.
> > The site itself is very useful and informative.
&g
A. Johnson, <http://cfajohnson.com>
> __
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Al Sparber wrote:
> On 4/10/2017 4:01 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>> List,
>>
>> I haven't used flex at all basically, but have an opportunity to.
>>
>> I have rows of 3 items. I would like them evenly spaced, but if the l
iers
> Design Drumm
> http://designdrumm.com
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 10, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> >
> > List,
> >
> > I haven't used flex at all basically, but have an opportunity to.
> >
> > I have rows of 3 items. I would like them
eem to get this.
Is it possible? I've gotten close, but last two items are far left and far
right.
Thanks!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
rgh wrote:
>
> > On Apr 6, 2017, at 1:47 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> >
> > Here is my structure and css:
>
>
>
> > In Edge, on hover the svg disappears when you move your cursor off the
> > element.
> >
> > Anyone see why or know what's up? I'
been messing around with style
changes, but can't see what Edge is doing. I'm sorry I can't provide a
link. I'll take any guesses at this point.
TIA
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.
.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
>
> >>
> >> Just found this:
> >>
>
> > https://www.sitepoint.com/css-viewport-units-quick-start/
>
>
> G-Jim c):{-
>
> --
> Custom book-boxes: http://www.wyomerc.com/bookboxes/bookboxes.html
> Book repairs: http://www.wyomerc.com/bookrepair/bookrepai
>
> Just found this:
>
https://www.sitepoint.com/css-viewport-units-quick-start/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
_
2vw) = 35.2px + 22px = 57.2px
>
>
>
>
>
Visual Aid?
https://tomliv.com/css-d/costello/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
___
Who's on first.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 3:08 AM Felix Miata wrote:
> Anyone else think of Abbott and Costello reading this thread? :-)
>
> --
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic
xels ?
>
> For example; 2em is equal to 4vw. Also
>
> If the default font size is 16 pixels and if |2vw| is 2% of the viewport’s
> width ?
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456
To be more clear:
REMs, on the other hand, are relative to the root element (HTML) which is
based on the browser preference setting.
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> Once again, they are unrelated in the way you are showing here.
>
> vw/vh units are relat
would equal 4.4vw ?
>
>
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.cs
Sorry, that's just the typical way I hear of these types of things.
Newsletters or this list mainly.
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Philip Taylor wrote:
>
>
> Tom Livingston wrote:
> > I subscribe to newsletters such as Frontend Focus, Alistapart (digest),
> > Ver
s.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss
I updated the page to use vh. Seems to work well.
Not sure if I can go the flex route. Will need to look into browser support
first, but I hope I can. Much simpler.
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> Looks like I should be able to use vh. I'll give that a try
Looks like I should be able to use vh. I'll give that a try and test.
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 8:00 PM Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
> > On Mar 22, 2017, at 8:28 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> >
> > For me, there was extra height to the page, with a white bg. I could
&g
For me, there was extra height to the page, with a white bg. I could scroll
past the orange bg. Again, in I.E. Edge/11.
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 7:26 PM Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
> > On Mar 22, 2017, at 4:54 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> >
> > Here is a sample page:
&
UPDATE: I added overflow:hidden to .pagewrap on *my local page* and this
made the extra space go away. I'd still love to know if it can be solved
w/o the overflow:hidden.
Thanks!
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> Here is a sample page:
> https://tom
'. It's fine in FF, Chrome and Safari.
I am using transition to vertical center the content at a viewport height
greater than 750px.
Thanks
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 |
without finding a solution.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discu
Works on iPhone/up-to-date Android. This is only a start. Work in progress.
But does demonstrate the question the OP asked. Getting the sub to show
with hover - which is with a mouse.
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 8:37 PM Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
> > On Mar 21, 2017, at 3:30 AM, Tom L
_
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.htm
This does work with touch devices I've tested, btw...
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> I have a sample here:
>
> https://tomliv.com/navigation-menu/index.html
>
> Though not perfect, you get the idea...
>
>
>
>>
--
Tom Livingston |
gt;
> --
> Custom book-boxes: http://www.wyomerc.com/bookboxes/bookboxes.html
> Book repairs: http://www.wyomerc.com/bookrepair/bookrepairs.html
> My photography: http://www.gjim.com
>
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.30
NU/Linux Developer 00372-54541400
>
> __
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- htt
ize I desired. I have seen SASS mixins that
implement a min/max but it had its limitations.
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> I see that as if the viewport is 800px wide, then 800px is 100% of the
> width.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 7:56 PM, Crest Christ
I see that as if the viewport is 800px wide, then 800px is 100% of the
width.
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 7:56 PM, Crest Christopher <
crestchristop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Therefore, if the viewport width is 800px = 8% of viewport width; if I'm
> doing the math right ?
>
> T
No. Viewport units are based on the viewport. 1vw = 1% of viewport width,
1vh = 1% viewport height.
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Crest Christopher <
crestchristop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What is 1vw, a pixel ?
>
>
>
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Develop
tc ?
>
> Rainer Berthold <mailto:rainer.berth...@gmx.net>
>> Sunday, March 19, 2017 2:39 PMvia Postbox <https://www.postbox-inc.com/?
>> utm_source=email&utm_medium=sumlink&utm_campaign=reach>
>>
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Dev
rted by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
oks like an opacity issue, but there
> is no opacity set on it.
>
>
After downloading the image and opening it in PhotoShop, the png itself is
translucent.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.4
; > http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Rod Castello
> DIGITAL DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
> 818.437.7880
> rodcastel...@gmail.com
> www.smashcube.com
> __
I do not. I was assuming the HTML couldn't be changed. The best thing to do
is get rid of the span.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 5:04 PM Philip Taylor wrote:
>
>
> Tom Livingston wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Crest Christopher
> > wrote:
> >> I
position the tag ?
The span is an inline element which doesn't respond to margin styles.
add a declaration for the span to be inline-block (or block) and then
try your positioning.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph:
to change.
>
> thanks in advance,
>
> ron
>
> __
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by e
t very
> forgiving then again, there support in the past has been not the
> friendliest.
>
> Tom Livingston
> Wednesday, February 22, 2017 8:39 AM
> https://www.w3.org/community/webed/wiki/The_CSS_layout_model_-_boxes_borders_margins_padding#When_margins_alone_aren.E2.80.99t_enough:_paddin
https://www.w3.org/community/webed/wiki/The_CSS_layout_model_-_boxes_borders_margins_padding#When_margins_alone_aren.E2.80.99t_enough:_padding_properties
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> Negative padding is treated like 0 or none. In padding short hand, I
> *thi
>> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
>> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
> __
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> http://www.css-discuss.or
be a bit easier...
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> While it is great that it works for you and you've had success, Karl,
> I don't really recommend using anything other than tables. At least
> not until you are proficient in using tables (for email)
t;
> Built a lot of HTML emails in my day and these tips work for me.
>
> HTH,
> Best,
> Karl
>
> Sent from losPhone
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
___
x" on small
> screens. Then you show an hide those when appropriate with your MQ's.
> For the copy, try using "em" sizes instead of "px" sizing and they will
> resize automatically when the screen size is reduced. You can use "px" but
> will pr
That should be:
@media screen and (max-width: 640px) {
> table{ width: 320px!important; }
> }
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> Ron,
>
> Looks to me like you closed the MQ before all of the styles, so the
> styles are working all the time. Al
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
>> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
>> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
> __
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
> h
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 10:11 PM Crest Christopher <
crestchristop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've taken a step away from my web development projects to finish other
>
> projects and far from done so, bare with me if I forgot a thing or two
>
> until the get the motor running :)
>
> At this point I wan
I tried. I have Coda. My dev situation at work made it too much of a pain.
Your mileage may vary. If you can connect to your file remotely and
therefore use said remote environment to view the files - a web server -
then it may work for u.
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 2:54 PM John J wrote:
> Can an
ript is generating the content, it just seems to be hidden.
>
> Can anyone help me find the problem, please?
I am seeing JS errors in the console and when I inspect the area in
question, I am seeing some scripting.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.
et
> scrollbars with placed media unless we spec otherwise?
>
> Thank you!
>
> http://john-a-johnson.com/rokr.php
I'm seeing that as an iframe which could be the source of your
scrollbars. In latest Mac Chrome, I don't see any scrollbars.
--
Tom Livingston | Senio
the order of
declarations.
Thanks all.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-di
For clarity, I'll include my reply to Philippe, which I accidentally sent
only to him...
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:34 PM Tom Livingston wrote:
> >> Make any difference?
> >
> > No. The CSS parser doesn’t care.
> >
> > For the human eye aka readability of
> Best,
>
> Karl DeSaulniers
> Design Drumm
> http://designdrumm.com
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 13, 2016, at 10:32 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Oct 14, 2016, at 12:13 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> >>
> >> Curi
20px;
padding: 0;
position: relative;
width: 100%;
}
Make any difference?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css
ank you, Tom
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:18 AM, John J wrote:
>>
>> Are you saying to do this to my initial img tag so that this is universal?
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:13 PM, J
x27;s allowing this. I have my styles for the tiles
> set at max-width:30%; height:auto;
>
> Can anyone see what the source of this unwanted space is?
>
> Thank you!
>
Images are inline elements. If you add a display:block; rule to your
images, you can remove this gap.
--
Tom
I tend to favor floats myself. The biggest issue I've run into is having to
remove the gap between items that are inline-block. I guess I'm just so
used to floats now that I tend to use them without thinking about it.
I do rely on inline-block more for horizontal navbars, which causes the gap
to b
So on mobile, you will have a long scroll of separate groups of billeted
lists but at desktop you want the groups of billeted lists to be side by
side?
If so, you can float the lists ( < ul > ). Google 'CSS floats'.
__
css-discuss
saved as a new name (for
safety sake)
5. updated css to use new named file
6. Praised the Devine svg gods for showing me mercy at this hour
Tested successful in IE 9, 10 (Win 7 and 8), 11 and Edge.
Wow. That was a fight.
Thanks for looking at this if you did. Appreciate it.
--
Tom Livin
more problems.
Thanks for your time. I'll let you know.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-
;
background-size: 40px 32px;
background-position: 0 0;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
min-height: 35px;
}
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
_
All,
OK, i've tried several things I've found but I cannot get svg
background images to be the right size or position in IE9 +. Some are
fine, some don't work at all.
Anyone got a suggestion?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.45
wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#6633
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
>> On Aug 13, 2016, at 9:05 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>>
>> I personally wouldn't use rem's for all of the units involved with
>> that structure. rem is based on the root element's font si
he units involved with
that structure. rem is based on the root element's font size, making
it - I assume - dependent on how each browser renders a font, which is
where your slight differences come from. Also, the border widths you
have set are different.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Fron
Right, sorry. Was thinking about it wrong.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
t; }
>
> if it's a link that could possibly be more than one on a page, then I would
> use classes not an id.
>
> a.foobar[href*='#foobar'] {
> color: red;
> }
>
> HTH,
>
> Best,
>
> Karl DeSaulniers
If I am not mistaken, and for
As with many things, your browser support needs may vary. I believe
this will work back to IE8 or 9. caniuse.com listed other attribute
selectors but I didn't see this one specifically listed.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.45
cidentally replied off list with...
a[class="table-of-contents"]{
color: red;
}
Google "Attribute Selectors"
But more in line with the OP's actual question:
a[href*="table-of-contents"]{
color: red;
}
HTH
--
> really imagine how the two can co-exist. Margins on the other hand are not a
> layout model, but a spacing thing that eventually affect overall layout. Fun
> things to be had with `margin: auto 1em` assuming `flex-flow: row` ( I solved
> some edgy problem with that today).
>
>
uture. Odd that, unlike float in a flex row situation, margin in
this case is not overridden. Like I said, I don't have a firm grip on
flex yet.
Thanks all!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
Thursday, August 11, 2016, Crest Christopher
wrote:
> It could be the same, remember Safari doesn't emulate based on iOS.
>
> Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>
> It most definitely is not the same.
>
>
>
> On Thursday, August 11, 2016, Crest Christopher
>crestchristop
_support_evolt/
> __
> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org ]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/
a p:last-child{align-self: flex-end;} to get the last to stick to
the bottom of s, but this isn't working. Where am I messing it up?
Thanks
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogi
No. This...
body {
background-image: url('my300pximage.jpg');
}
@media and (min-width: 700px) {
body {
background-image: url('my700pximage.jpg');
}
}
...is not Sass, but it does what you described.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Develope
age.jpg');
> }
> }
>
This accomplishes what you were describing.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-discuss
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Chris Rockwell
wrote:
> Set top:0 in .colorbar-link.
>
Bingo! Makes sense. Thanks!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#
nd-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: 19px 35px;
padding: 25px 45px 25px 5%;
transition: all 0.5s ease;
box-shadow: 0 5px 15px rgba($grey, .8);
}
.colorbar-link:hover{
text-decoration: none;
top: -2px;
box-shadow: 0 11px 20px rgba($grey, .6);
}
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Develope
MQs are understood by I.E. 9 and up, for and chrome and safari.
On Saturday, July 30, 2016, Crest Christopher
wrote:
> I understand what you mean but there doesn't appear, by looking at the
> list of MQ that I have much option that are compatible with all browsers ?
> Tom Li
/policies.html
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com
#663399
__
css-d
On Thursday, July 28, 2016, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
> > On Jul 29, 2016, at 12:39 AM, Tom Livingston > wrote:
> >
> > This:
> >
> > background-image:none,none,url("images/bg_paper.Hi.jpg");
> >
> > should work. Same as I did her
px 0;
height: 500px;
width: 5000px;
}
}
@media screen and (min-width: 900px){
.test{
background-image: none, url("img/img4.jpg"), none;
}
}
Just use the correct order and positioning for the new image.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015
1 - 100 of 1178 matches
Mail list logo