You've been invited by rizkysyazuli to join Fancy!
To activate your invitation, go to:
http://www.thefancy.com/register?invitation_key=3db03df6de7bc65be438590abe0ac93cbeb5b20b
All the best,
Team Fancy
__
css-discuss [css-d@li
to mess around with the shell or your server
config.
http://code.google.com/p/minify/
--
*Rizky Syazuli*
Senior Front-End Developer
http://rzky.tumblr.com/
http://id.linkedin.com/in/rizky
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discu
'll share it once i get an
exact "formula". but does someone figure this out yet? i think we all
could really use a reference on this..
thx
--
Rizky Syazuli
Senior Front-End Developer
rizkysyaz...@gmail.com
http://id.linkedin.com/in/rizky
egative
margins, and relative positioning. so watch ur step :P
i've been tinkering with other positioning options and even rearranging the
markup. but i'm not happy with the end result. i'm not giving up just yet.
just wanna know if u guys have other thoughts on this.
thx
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Michael Grosch wrote:
> Hello Rizky,
>
> did you try the below? Feedback via the list would be greatly appreciated.
>
Hi Michael,
Really sorry for the late response. Yes, it works perfectly now btw.
Thx for your help, really appreciate it :)
Hi,
Sorry to bother again, but the fix has caused another problem.
The links inside the banner now become unclickable. Both on FF and IE.
It's probably coz of the negative z-index :(
Any hints?
Thx,
Rizky
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Michael Grosch wrote:
> Hello Rizky,
>
>
Cheers to you to Michael,
Works perfectly now. It never cross my mind to use negative z-index. Nice..
Btw, it seems ok to me. It's not a hack and it works. So, it's fine by me :)
Or maybe the others have a different opinion?
Thx anyway.
Rizky
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Mich
budanbalita.com/template/
http://ibudanbalita.com/assets/css/master.css
Thx,
Rizky
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List p
On 12/15/06, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I can't easily read text smaller than that on my screens.
> I design for 200% font-resizing, or 32px 'minimum font size', in case
> someone needs even larger text. You should try that.
done! the whole thing is now a liquid layout. dropp
On 12/14/06, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> For the page in question; add...
> #featured {position: relative;}
> ...to fix the "faulty element-stacking over the edge of an element with
> 'Layout'" bug in IE6 and older versions. That'll fix it.
i think the problem was on my code.
here's the url: http://kometdigital.web.id/portfolio/
the problematic section is at the bottom row. the one under the title
"fenomena el nano."
here's the css:
http://static.kometdigital.web.id/mt-static/themes/portfolio_theme/portfolio_theme.css
the section with negative margin is div#featured.
On 11/10/06, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Firefox, there's a little sidebar on the left with subpages. This
> bar does not show up on IE at all; instead, the border is blackened
> and looks dirty/ugly.
am i missing something? coz i do see a sidebar on both firefox 2.0 and I
cmiiw
- Rizky
Jing Xue wrote:
> I'm just wondering how well is the multi-class feature (i.e. class="style1
> style2 style3") supported in various browsers. Also, is there any significant
> difference between browsers in terms of how the order of class names affects
>
rsions of Opera, such as the "be nice to Opera rule". surely
those won't work anymore right? well, that's all for now, thx
regards,
Rizky
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listi
On 4/10/06, Ingo Chao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> What would be the semantically correct representation of a volume
> control, a definition list?
correct me if i'm wrong, but semantics are science for writing right? so i
don't think there's a markup for volume, tone of voice, or something
si
>
> Austin, Darrel wrote:
> > Well, I've looked through the exhaustive list of 3 column layouts that
> > the Wiki crew has so remarkably maintained:
> >
> > http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=ThreeColumnLayouts
> >
> > Alas, I couldn't find a single layout that prevented the IE/PC problem
> > whe
On 3/30/06, David Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> So I'm asking for a solution which gives me more flexible divs, I'd like
> them to take up enough space for their text without leaving big holes in
> the page. Can this be done, or is my first page as good as I can hope for.
>
>
i guess addi
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rizky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mar 5, 2006 4:35 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Gallery arrows out of position in IE Windows
To: Maxwell Balmain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 3/5/06, Maxwell Balmain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Another
On 3/3/06, Augusto Murri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> i've been testing this page for a week but there are some little problems
> in IE.
>
> The page in question is http://194.242.241.199/html/2/scheda_museo.php
>
> As u can see the list UL in the div#menu_categorie display bad in IE,
I'm forwarding this mail coz I've noticed it was sent directly to me
(and only to me), instead to the list. Sorry if I was mistaken though...
This is a reply from Ian Anderson.
Rizky wrote:
the content of master-import.css
@import url(main.css); @import url(about-page.css); @
Samatason Ltd wrote:
>The page is at http://www.samatason.co.uk/clients/tc/
>
>And the css is at http://www.samatason.co.uk/clients/tc/css/tc.css
>
>
looks fine to me, but there isn't much to comment for anyway :-P
About the file separation. If a certain page needs (many) specific
stylesheet
21 matches
Mail list logo
