good practice to put it there as it is a
render blocking resource - meaning: it blocks any rendering until the whole
stylesheet has been downloaded. It is a good idea, for performance reasons, to
put it as high as possible in the head, and certainly before any script.
Philippe
--
Philippe Witten
csswg.org/css-grid/#grid-containers
Maybe something like this will work (hard to say, can you provide a URL or a
test case?)
figure { grid-column: 2 / 4; }
figure + p { grid-column: 5 / 10; }
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
https://l-c-n.com/
_
nderstood his requirement of course - in which case the code
> I sent last time would also be invalid.
That one is easy.
td:not([colspan]):nth-child(2) { background: lime; }
You could make the range narrower, e.g. td:not([colspan=2]):nth-child(2) {}
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
https://l
oes, not sure which one is correct */
My preferred option is the first one.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
https://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/l
issues as `none`.
BTW - the CSS spec only lists two possible values for the `appearance`
property: auto or none, with auto meaning “it’s up to the UA”.
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui-4/#propdef-appearance
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
https://l-c-n.com/
___
> On Jun 21, 2017, at 7:24 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
>
>> On Jun 21, 2017, at 6:36 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
>>
>> Again, I didn't see a -webkit-appearance:none in the specs. I may have
>> looked right past it. Not sure.
>
e global keywords inherit | initial | unset are a given for every property,
defined in CSS cascade [1]
[1] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-cascade-3/#defaulting
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/#common-keywords
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
x: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh771816
- input[type=file]:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/hh779844.aspx
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/hh465820.aspx
Have fun
matches when the checkbox / radio is toggled. I should have suggested using the
`:checked` pseudo-class instead.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
https://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.cs
t he does want to remove the native look-and-feel.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
https://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http:/
earance: checkbox;
border-style: unset;
So, it will give exactly the same result, different of what Firefox 53 did
(which only removed the platform specific “look” when the -moz-appearance:
checkbox; is specified).
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
https://l-c-n.com/
__
tps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=605985
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Releases/54
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/-moz-appearance
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
https://l-c-n.com/
_
ous version
don’t support css variables. FWIW, I have _on average_ a 15%~20% user base for
IE 11.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
https://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.or
to give you some idea.
https://emps.l-c-n.com/category/image/sand-reflections/
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
https://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css
list is this: https://drafts.csswg.org/indexes/ (but note the draft
status).
As an alternative, there is the excellent documentation maintained by the
people at mozilla.org:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/Reference
Good
ographic history. IOW it is an
arbitrary name.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
https://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-di
, but can't see what Edge is doing. I'm sorry I can't provide a
> link. I'll take any guesses at this point.
Is this what I should see?
https://dev.l-c-n.com/_junk/tl.html
(best guess, after trying to desassify the provided CSS)
If so, that works perfectly fine on this sid
window, a complete different
kind of thing than above.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
https://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- h
mputed value of font-size is
actually exactly 16px.
(and my cat sleeps more than 10cm away from my keyboard…)
Please stop comparing the two things, it is a waste of time.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
https://l-c-n.com/
___
such as
“menu” or “navigation”.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com
500px wide;
2.2 * 500/100 = 2.2 * 5 = 11px. In this case, the font-size will be 35.2px +
11px = 46.2px.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.o
scade doesn’t mess up with your calculations,
* the stars align
* the stock market crashed
* ….
* ……
* my cat sleeps more than 10cm away from my keyboard
In other words, almost certainly never.
[1] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/#viewport-relative-lengths
Philippe
--
Philip
scade doesn’t mess up with your calculations,
* the stars align
* the stock market crashed
* ….
* ……
* my cat sleeps more than 10cm away from my keyboard
In other words, almost certainly never.
[1] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/#viewport-relative-lengths
Philippe
--
Philip
dth ?
Mr Crest,
As others have already said: `em` units and `vw` units have NOTHING, I repeat,
NOTHING, to do with each other.
(also, if you don’t mind, please take the time to trim your replies to this
list)
Philippe
--
Philippe W
e state. `vh` and `vw` units (and their companions `vmin`
and `vmax`) have been implemented for quite a few years - even IE 11 supports
them.
An other resource is the list of CSS WG editor drafts: https://drafts.csswg.org.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenb
tent (and on the way simplify your markup…). Of course, all depends on the
browsers you need to support.
Minimal example: https://dev.l-c-n.com/_junk/__x.html
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-di
w in Edge no matter what, as it
is too tall for the (maximised) window on that laptop.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/c
ems, similar to the keyboard
users above.
It would be acceptable if your top-level links point to some sort of landing
page(s), where the subnav links are explicitly described.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
e interacting with the whole construct… Lacks
context.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://c
layout.
[1] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-round-display/
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -
ng two anchor points (anchor points **within the same **). If
you want a series of dots, perhaps you want the element?
Two s with one anchor point each will never connect to each other.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
>
>
>
>
> CSS
> #Artwork_1_1_ .st0 {
> color:blue;
> }
It is `path` with only one anchor point. How do you expect anything to be
visible?
Besides, in SVG, it is `fill` and `stroke`.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
___
need the `clear:both` on the figcaption, position: absolute takes
care of that.
2. there is lots of white space at the bottom of the image (inside / part of
the image)
3. tip for debugging: use bright borders and backgrounds to see where those
human eye aka readability of a stylesheet, that is another matter.
Excellent fuel for violent flame wars.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.or
mage?
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://
ft column,
making any click through (on the select) impossible, try giving `fieldset ul {
background: red; }` to see what I mean.
First step, as Karl notes, use a `` to wrap you text in. That is more valid
html anyway.
Philippe
--
Philippe Witten
, etc).
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http:
e elements end up on the page, at
paint-time. A small font like Times will use less vertical pixel space then a
large font like Verdana.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@list
what you are attempting, but you are up
to the limits of display technology. If you compare carefully, you’ll probably
notice small differences between a retina and a non-retina display.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
___
ld this be technically impossible?
> - Has this been proposed before?
I don’t think so.
> - Any tips for proposing one? ;P
The mailing list for the CSS WG is your best bet.
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
0 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
>
> Yes, looks like it..
>
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/:target
No that is not it at all. The :target pseudo class styles the target of the
link, IOW, the destination. What the OP wants is st
layout. Fun
things to be had with `margin: auto 1em` assuming `flex-flow: row` ( I solved
some edgy problem with that today).
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
h
ame as screen pixels).
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List po
9.3.x. Hard to say if your issue is real, a bug in an
older version of iOS or something else.
As always a link to the issue at hand would immensely facilitated the
discussion.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
> On Aug 11, 2016, at 5:57 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> a p:last-child{align-self: flex-end;} to get the last to stick to
> the bottom of s, but this isn't working. Where am I messing it up?
Perhaps:
a p:last-child {
margin-top: auto;
}
Philippe
--
Philippe Witte
, physical devices? Or with some emulator /
simulator kind of thing? The latter gives you at best an approximation of the
real thing (assuming you use an emulation that uses the WebKit rendering
engine).
Philippe
--
Philippe W
background-position: 10px 10px;
}
}
If background-position is _not_ specified inside the second block, it will of
course inherit from the first block, and will use the first specified position
in that rule. The same applies to background-size, background-repeat, etc.
Philippe
--
Ph
: inline-block;
width: 16px;
height: 16px;
/* etc - adjust to taste and needs */
}
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinf
ont-face) that contains that glyph. For
example:
font-family: 'athelas', 'arial unicode MS', sans-serif. // Roboto, the default
on Android, has very similar metrics
[*] a quick test on fonts.com (the official provider of that font) shows that,
indeed, it does not contain a glyp
pend on the
computed value of the element itself.
That means (to come back to the rem vs em topic) that the resulting value for
padding, border, margin, background-position, etc are depending on the nesting
inside the document tree if using `em` units. The `rem` unit avoids that.
Philippe
--
P
Equal to the computed value of the font-size property of the element on which
it is used.
[/unquote]
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/
n
the computed value of the font-size as set on the root element. For the `em
unit` it is based on the font-size of the element itself.)
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discus
> On Jul 12, 2016, at 12:28 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> On Monday, July 11, 2016, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
>> How did Peter Gabriel creep into the conversation?
>
>
> He sang the song "Sledgehammer" ;)
Ah. Thanks. I learned something today! Las
aversion to
so-called ‘reset’ css thingies is well-known on this list)
How did Peter Gabriel creep into the conversation?
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
ht
ride the default box-sizing in a case by
case approach.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http
lly prefer reading text
that is left-aligned though (even with hyphenation turned on).
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listi
> On May 30, 2016, at 3:02 AM, william drescher wrote:
>
> On 5/29/2016 9:13 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>>
>>> On May 29, 2016, at 6:49 PM, william drescher
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> That works nicely except the radio buttons stay
mind that the look of those things is actually an image.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- h
ant to increase
> everything.
I would start with:
html, button, input, select, textarea { font-size: 3rem; }
then see if you need further adjustment to form controls (such as padding,
border, …)
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenberg
> On May 15, 2016, at 8:52 PM, JW wrote:
>
> What's the standard design resolution for web nowadays? I tried using 1400px
> with and it came up too big.
Fluid: from 250px to infinity (in practice that mean something of a maximum
width of 1350px for us)
Philippe
--
Philippe
: those filters only work up to IE 9 and
maybe IE10 & IE11 in some obscure back compete mode. They won’t work in Edge.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://
ccepts 2 parameters (browser support
is more limited, check caniuse.com). Don’t know what the result would be
though, I’ve never used it so far.
see:
https://drafts.fxtf.org/filters/#blurEquivalent
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
image is embedded directly inside the HTML.
Like this:
………
Sara Soueidan has some examples of animations on hover (scroll down):
https://sarasoueidan.com/tools/circulus/
There is lots of useful info about SVG on her site.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
___
yled.
3/ anything in the stylesheet that could possibly override your styling? check
with the developer tools in your browser what styling is actually applied.
> I also tried targeting the the image is in and applying padding to the
> cell like this:
>
> td < a[title="Ba
iOS 7.x does support css transforms just fine —natively!—. You need
to use the -webkit- prefix though.
Apple’s Safari Team invented the whole damn thing.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@li
r more complex mess, with dropdown etc, I use the
bootstrap menu.
http://getbootstrap.com/customize/ and check only the dropdown menu + collapse,
and forget about all their CSS.
Both include the necessary machinery for aria-* attributes.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wit
ke.github.io/refresh-sf/
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
L
y_slide2-1600x569.jpg?1454124914409,
and ImageOptim crunched it from 214Kb to 199Kb (that is 7%).
[2] example:
http://www.whatsmyip.org/http-compression-test/?url=aHR0cDovL3Rwc2F1dG9zaGlwcGVycy5jb20vd3AtY29udGVudC90aGVtZXMvR2FyYWdlL3N0eWxlLmNzcw=
n need to try to be ”web compatible”.
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/mediaqueries-4/#mf-interaction
check this article by Patrick Lauke:
https://dev.opera.com/articles/media-features/
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
the relevant bits, sorry.
I’ve always wondered why that stylesheet sets the line-height on the `sub` and
`sup` to `0`. I never had a problem with letting the line-height inherit from
the parent element (default behaviour).
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
___
r the
years!
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -
it rendering engine.
The only thing where that emulator is useful is evaluating how your page might
look like given a viewport of xxx px by yyy px.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css
the web app to which I'm
> using ?
The obvious question of course : do those devices run the same OS ? Same
version of Mobile Safari (which is basically the same question)?
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
> On Oct 1, 2015, at 22:56, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> He means Google it.
Or DuckDuckGo it, or Bing it, or Yahoo it, or Yandex it, or…
Let’s propagate a new verb: to searchengine.
(darn, I didn’t think “$search_engine_of_your_choice“ would be so hard to
understand)
Philippe
--
ly.
> How do I find what fonts are pre-installed on most mobile / tablet / desktops
> ?
Have you tried $search_engine_of_your_choice? Sometimes that is useful
technology.
“font-list iOS”, “installed fonts Android”, etc, and any variation thereof.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenb
'';
}
With that you'll have an ::after element that is still empty and sized to 0 x
0px but it 'exists' as far as your CSS is concerned. Give it some width and
height, specify the display property (`inline` being the initial value).
as it is, your `p.studentredirect::after`
urce for the font and a descriptor
@font-face {
font-family: 'my ugly font'; /* descriptor */
src: url(/path/to/my-ugly-font.woff) format('woff');
}
(I usually insert that near the top of my stylesheets, but it can go any place)
Philip
eed this to solve the bug in android stock browsers with
> responsive design. Problem; When you add a border or background to a
> select, the arrow and border anymore on that dropdown box are not visible
> anymore.)
See Tom's answer.
Styling select widgets in blink/webkit brows
> On Sep 22, 2015, at 10:55, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
>
> Make the PNGs translucent?
Yes, of course… But in the context of this list, I always assume a CSS way of
doing things.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://
to the whole element itself, do you?
Now, if you mean, can I have different translucency applied to
background-images, the answer is currently no. The are ideas under discussion
to make that possible but currently nothing is really specced, let alone
implemented in any browser…
Philippe
--
Phili
u don’t need it)
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policie
CSS2.1:10.2.
But if you set the width of the `a` to `inherit`, then yes everything falls in
place, as the width of the `li` is already computed, and that is the value that
cascades through.
(hope this is readable English)
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
s a cookie and a glass of cold water with one ice cube.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List
ckground: url("overlay-img.png") no-repeat scroll 87% 30px rgba(0, 0, 0,
0.75);
The background-position is different. Yours ask fo putting the image 100px from
the left, centred vertically. Theirs ask to put the image 30px from the top
and, from the left, match the 87% point of the im
so) “noise” to an AT user.
And even Jim Thatcher’s examples that could be left visible to AT users only
should, imho, benefit from using aria attributes instead. Bear in mind that he
wrote that comment 4 years ago; support of aria has improved immensely since
then. And —cela va de soi— there a
ut Edge?), Chrome unknown.
Deprecated doesn’t mean that browsers will drop support for a
feature/property/value soon, if ever.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.or
f needed. Of course, mind the specificity etc…
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-dis
ewhere that prevents it.
Look at this test case, the span rests on the baseline:
http://dev.l-c-n.com/_junk/cssd-af.html
(the red line indicates the baseline)
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discu
quired-value
(Note the date at the top of the document)
Current Selectors 4 draft
https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors/#required-pseudo
As Ryan says, the validator needs some love.
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
with the amount of content it contains,
no? Unless, that is, you set `height` or `max-height`.
I suspect your problem might be that your `footer` doesn’t move (lower) when
you add content to your sidebar. That will depend on how you coded your whole
page. Hard to say without at least a minimal tes
ge.
Unless the images are really small, things like icons or thumbnails
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/
cted in Chromium based
browsers, but at least in Opera, you need the -webkit prefix (and I’m not clear
if the `mask-type:` is actually fully supported).
http://caniuse.com/#search=mask
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
_
> Le 27 mai 2015 à 08:28, Crest Christopher a
> écrit :
>
> How can I background-repeat in one direction ?
1st hit:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=MDN+background-repeat&t=osx
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
resources tab at the
bottom).
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incut
find. Do you mean to point to the element
with ID=primary-navigation? if so, you should correct the “href” in your button
link to point to that (a href="primary-navigation"), and then make sure your
stylesheet references that.
#p
! They are asking feedback from stylesheet authors:
http://www.w3.org/blog/CSS/2015/05/05/flexbox-percentage-margins/
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.c
monospace }
.wrap > .kid { display: inline-block; font-size: 1rem /*to taste*/;
font-family: /*whatever*/, sans-serif; box-sizing: border-box; width: xxx%;
vertical-align: top; }
works pretty well for me. Need a bit of hacking for IE 8 thou
p ) to prevent old Android versions using it. So Safari is locked out
> anyway.
What issue (and which old Android) are you seeing? And, you lock out IE 10/11
as well?
Philippe
--
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
__
css-d
are only 2 conditions that must be true:
'min-width' + 'min-resolution'
> I'm using this in picturefill (ver 1.x) and I think it's causing an
> error and need another pair of eyes. Picturefill use is:
>
>
IDKN ? what erro
mension of their containing block.
[/quote]
given that the height of your flex items () is auto, the vertical
padding computes to 0.
PS - don’t forget to add the -webkit- prefixed properties / values for Safari.
Philippe
--
Phil
1 - 100 of 1770 matches
Mail list logo