>
> Seems pretty unreadable to me. Fortunately, there is nothing whatsoever
> that you can do to force your font sizes on any visitor using a modern
> browser short of making he page one big image.
>
Don't them any ideas! :-)
- Keith
Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:00 PM, JR Heard wrote:
> Els:
>
> You are a fantastic person. Looks like that was the root cause after
> all - I can now see AdBrite again. I owe you a beer.
>
> -JR
>
>
Something funny is going on here. I can't see it either. I swear that I
have never been to your site,
whatever
tabbed in 2 px or so
some more
more
Make sure to move that .
The li is not a direct decendent of the li. Would this work?
ul li ul li
{
padding-left: 2px;
}
- Keith
_
Not showing up here. Don't see anything out of the norm.
3.0.4/Win XP Pro SP2
- Keith D.
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.
When you hover over the tabs, the lighter blue 'hover image' has a square
left side.
I believe the OP is trying to hide this.
- Keith
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
I would try the image sprite and just change the background coordinates as
necessary. I don't think it is going to be as big of a loading problem as
you believe.
Try using this:
http://www.websiteoptimization.com/services/analyze/index.html
Using that logo.jpg link, it says that on a 56K connecti
I don't think that makes much sense.
With the asterisk like that, you want the margin, text-decoration, padding,
color, float, display...all blue? Blue is not a valid value for all but 1 of
the preceeding.
Thoroughly Confused...
Keith D.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:05 PM, johny why wrote:
> wh
Is BrowrCamp maybe what you are thinking of?
http://www.browsrcamp.com/
- Keith
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Del Wegener wrote:
> I have seen references to browsershot on this list.
> Is there another similar site?
> Thanks
> Del
>
> ___
Also, going back to its HTML history, screen readers (for the handicapped)
recognize the inherent 'orderliness' of a ol, over an ul.
IMHO, listing the ingredients needed in a recipe need not have the same
precedence as the recipe instructions.
Two cents poorer,
Keith D.
If you are talking about 1) redirecting the short one to the long one or 2)
masking the URL to appear as the short one...No.
Using PHP, if possible, modifying the htaccess with some REGEX would be a
relevant search.
Keith D.
__
Thanks for the clarification Jim.
Keith
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Sup
So is there, or is there not, an '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' address where people can
just shoot the breeze? I know that Majestic has asked this twice before and
both times was directed to that static page of links to more lists.
I believe I may be missing a key link in the chain...LOL.
__
I will take back my hand slapping comment, but I am still of the opinion
that the OP implied that they wanted sorta *personal* recommendations to
other lists, not a link to a list of lists.
Sorta like:
"I'm a member of php-x and love it. The people are very helpful and
knowledgeable and the side
Oh, come on, we can't even (publicly) help people anymore! Yes, this may be
classified in the strict OT rules, but Hedley has a VALID question about
where to get good support/help. This isn't about politics or Rwanda.
Hedley, I personally don't have any suggestions besides Google (but that
only g
About 90% of the time I do the border-top:0 method, but I have found myself
using the 0 1 1 1 method as well.
I don't really see anything wrong with it.
Maybe in the future we'll have: border:0 1px 1px 1px solid blue;
__
css-disc
So you want to go...
WORD --> word --> WORD
??
I am drawing a blank on the whole *can't capitalize a capitalized letter*.
If the letter is already capitalized, the CSS is just going to leave it
alone. No?
__
css-discuss [EMAIL P
I would tend to agree with David on the loading part. I clicked the link
right after loading this email, read the entire conversation, went to your
link, and had an additional ~20 sec. wait for the beans. Probably a minute
total...just for the beans :) Figured you should know, maybe something to
l
OT: The JS you see is an if-statement [condition] ? [true] : [false]. It
does look like a mess though.
Keith D.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discus
Correct me, if I am wrong, but I don't think *a:link:visited:hover:active*
will work. I think you have to split them up:
a:visited,a:hover,a:active
{
}
Keith D.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Martha Spizziri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe I'm having a brain cramp, but I've looked at t
My answer:
If you don't mind the wait, http://browsershots.org/ will give you some
options and be able to actually see how it renders.
My 2 cents...
I am with you Lisa, I like to see how things look at different resolutions
and such. Not saying the previous information was wrong at all, but some
Thanks Thierry!
Keith D.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Thierry Koblentz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > discuss.org] On Behalf Of Keith DiSarno
> > Sent: Friday, August
Bill,
>From what I see, you can combine the two styles because of the same name,
but then you have display:inline-block and block in the same style. How can
this be? Are you working around something in IE? Inline-block possibly?
Thanks,
Keith
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Bill Brown <[EMAIL
Using PHP:
1. Change extension from .css to .php
2. Place as the first line with
your regular .css underneath
3. For a random background put:
background:url('background_.jpg');
--Keith
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Anthony Aziz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I don't think it's possible with
$num = 0;
for($row = 0;$row<10;$row++)
{
do
{
echo picArray[$num];
if($num % 3 == 0)
{
echo "";
}
$num++;
}while($x < count($picArray))
}
Keith
On 11/7/07, Christopher McComas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Not sure if there's anyone here that could help, I posted on their support
> forums, b
>
> The first goal is to start very simple, striving for readability,
> usability, and cross-browser compatibility. The bells, whistles, and
> things that glow in the dark are put on the back burner.
>
>
OT, but that is the best quote ever!
Continue on...
Keith D.
___
Any of these help?
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=ThreeColumnLayouts
They are straight from the lists' wiki.
Keith D.
On 10/8/07, Arthur Gapusan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I wanted to create a 3 column layout.
> of course, a left, center and right column...
>
> I wanted t
Simple: When listing less than 4 parameters, the CSS 'engine' pulls it from
the other side of the element. Sorta makes everything symmetrical. (But it
always goes [top] [right] [bottom] [left]...does that make it confusing?)
Keith
On 10/4/07, Elias Abunassar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/4
OFFTOPIC:
Zoe,
Wow! I am in the middle of something similar and was doing a little poking
around on this web of ours looking for some stuff, and you have hit the nail
right on the head. That link was exactly what I needed to see. Thanks!!!
Keith
On 9/26/07, Zoe M. Gillenwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED
on, glad I caught it though.
Keith
On 9/18/07, Keith DiSarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Micky:
>
> 3. TRUE or FALSE:
> If both values are keywords, the horizontal value *must* come first. Or
> is this just a matter preference and/or good coding practice?
>
>
Micky:
3. TRUE or FALSE:
If both values are keywords, the horizontal value *must* come first. Or
is this just a matter preference and/or good coding practice?
It doesn't matter which comes first because are no overlapping values in the
horizontal and vertical options. If the CSS interpreter sees
30 matches
Mail list logo