Re: [css-d] @fontface

On Thursday, January 06, 2011 09:21:22 am David Laakso wrote: > Re: [intentional spelling] > > Please drag to an approximately 400px window. > > FF/3.6.13 and SeaMonkey render sans, rather than the intended > slab-serif, for the heading "About" on the i

Re: [css-d] Web typography with CSS3

On Friday, December 31, 2010 02:50:40 pm Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: > On Fri, 31 Dec 2010, David McGlone wrote: > > On Friday, December 31, 2010 02:00:15 pm Guy K. Haas wrote: > >> On Fri, December 31, 2010 10:49 am, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: > ... > > >>>

Re: [css-d] Web typography with CSS3

On Friday, December 31, 2010 02:00:15 pm Guy K. Haas wrote: > On Fri, December 31, 2010 10:49 am, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: > > On Sat, 1 Jan 2011, Alan Gresley wrote: > >> On 1/01/2011 4:27 AM, Gabriele Romanato wrote: > >>> I know but I'm in a hurry... preparing for the New Year night :-D > >

Re: [css-d] image placement question - amended

On Tuesday, December 28, 2010 04:41:10 pm Matthew P. Johnson wrote: > OK So I have figured out how to left vertically align, now I am trying to > figure out if there is a way to have the images start a second column when > a fixed div height is reached instead of continuing downward forever. I am >

Re: [css-d] styling text area

On Monday, December 27, 2010 10:44:36 am David Laakso wrote: > On 12/27/10 10:29 AM, David McGlone wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I am wondering if it's possible to use css to style a text area in finer > > detail than just using "cols" and "rows&qu

Re: [css-d] styling text area

On Monday, December 27, 2010 10:40:12 am Germán Martínez wrote: > Hi David, > > Yes, it is possible to style a using CSS. > Just add a width, if you want the textarea to fit the width of its > contatiner use width: 100%; (I'd recommend defining a height too). > > Try this code: > > .mailform

[css-d] styling text area

Hi everyone, I am wondering if it's possible to use css to style a text area in finer detail than just using "cols" and "rows" in the tag. I have a text area on a contact page, but by just using cols and rows I get different results in different browsers. Here's my codes: text area code: cs

Re: [css-d] Is it because of my code? [correction]

On Saturday, December 18, 2010 02:21:05 am G.Sørtun wrote: > On 18.12.2010 06:13, David McGlone wrote: > >> http://99.90.129.247 > >> and I'm having a problem with the text in the header not positioning > >> correctly. I'm wondering if for any reason

Re: [css-d] Is it because of my code? [correction]

On Saturday, December 18, 2010 12:10:41 am David McGlone wrote: > Hi everyone > > I have a couple questions, I am working on this site http://99.90.129.247 > and I'm having a problem with the text in the header not positioning > correctly. I'm wondering if for any rea

[css-d] Is it because of my code?

Hi everyone I have a couple questions, I am working on this site http://99.90.129.247 and I'm having a problem with the text in the header not positioning correctly. I'm wondering if for any reason it's something I have done. I have validated my CSS and had no problems. Also, is there an easy

Re: [css-d] Web development without Internet Explorer

On Saturday, December 11, 2010 08:27:37 am Gabriele Romanato wrote: > Hi. > I'm just seeking volunteers for a radical change in how we think > coding in general. > I respect the backward-compatibilty point of view but, nonetheless, I > can't say it's Gospel. > > hope this would be useful for a sti

Re: [css-d] Horizontal drop-down menu placement

On Thursday, November 11, 2010 09:41:52 pm Steve Caramia wrote: > For once, NOT about IE: > > > I built this nav system with the help of an article from the good > peeps at A List Apart (no javascript!). Since the whole thing is CSS- > driven, is there a way to make the submenus flush right to th

Re: [css-d] Is this dumb? UPDATE

On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 07:55:43 pm David McGlone wrote: > On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 07:34:11 pm David McGlone wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've been working on this layout: (w/screenshots from browsershots) > > http://www.dmcentral.net/misc and I

Re: [css-d] Is this dumb? UPDATE

On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 07:34:11 pm David McGlone wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been working on this layout: (w/screenshots from browsershots) > http://www.dmcentral.net/misc and I can't figure out why in IE 8 the whole > "body" shifts to the left about 5 pi

Re: [css-d] Is this dumb?

On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 08:12:59 pm David McGlone wrote: > On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 08:00:24 pm David Laakso wrote: > > On 11/10/10 7:34 PM, David McGlone wrote: > > > 2nd finally ;-) I can't figure out why this simple layout isn't > > > working.

Re: [css-d] Is this dumb?

On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 08:00:24 pm David Laakso wrote: > On 11/10/10 7:34 PM, David McGlone wrote: > > 2nd finally ;-) I can't figure out why this simple layout isn't working. > > "Cut to the chase." > Put the html/css file [s] on a public server a

[css-d] Is this dumb?

Hi all, I've been working on this layout: (w/screenshots from browsershots) http://www.dmcentral.net/misc and I can't figure out why in IE 8 the whole "body" shifts to the left about 5 pixels and cuts some of the left side off according to browserlab. In IE 7 according to browserlab the "body"

Re: [css-d] evenly spacing

On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 14:01 -0800, David Hucklesby wrote: > On 11/7/10 8:51 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: > > David McGlone wrote: > >> [...] I have a horizontal menu that I was using an UL list, this > >> worked in firefox, but not completly in IE 7/8 and various others.

Re: [css-d] z-index question in FF

one advise? > > > That logo image is clipped because you specified #container {overflow: > hidden;} > Remove that to start. > > Imho you really should remove most of your usage of position: relative. It > makes your life wayway more complicated than it should be. > > O

Re: [css-d] Quirks compendium?

On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 14:47 +1100, Alan Gresley wrote: > David McGlone wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 13:15 -0600, Keith Purtell wrote: > [snip] > >> I wonder if someone on the Web has a > >> list of the most common quirks for different browsers/versions? > >

Re: [css-d] z-index question in FF

On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 19:51 -0700, Debbie Campbell wrote: > In this site (still very much in progress and only checked in FF so far) > the logo on the left should be on top of the brown/green/tan background > image: > > > http://www.redkitecreative.com/projects/camper/ > > I've moved it down so

Re: [css-d] Quirks compendium?

On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 15:20 -0800, Michael Geary wrote: > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 2:53 PM, David McGlone wrote: > > > > > Sorry :-( I was trying to help. > > > > -- > > Blessings > > David M. > > > > Hey, my goodness, you didn't do any

[css-d] evenly spacing

Hello everyone While we were discussing how to check sites in the last topic "Quirks compendium" I was replying to Michael Geary about browsershots and browswerlabs I had to run myself through browserlabs to accurately describe what I was trying to explain and I came across a couple problems with a

Re: [css-d] Quirks compendium?

On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 12:22 -0800, Michael Geary wrote: > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 11:45 AM, David McGlone wrote: > > > sorry about that, that was the URL from google, but when I click on it, > > it isn't the same. here's the correct one > > > > https://br

Re: [css-d] Quirks compendium?

On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 21:50 +0100, bruce.som...@web.de wrote: > > "Michael Geary" wrote: > > >That would also let Adobe present the BrowserLab UI in your own language > >instead of English if they support it (and it looks from the URL like they > >may have other languages besides English). > > Th

Re: [css-d] Quirks compendium?

> > -Original Message- > From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org > [mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of David McGlone > Sent: November-07-10 11:39 > To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org > Subject: Re: [css-d] Quirks compendium? > > On Sun, 2010-

Re: [css-d] Quirks compendium?

On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 13:15 -0600, Keith Purtell wrote: > When it comes to making sure my Web design appears normally in different > browsers, I've been checking via the three installed on my PC, the Mac > at work, two other PCs owned by family members, and an iPhone a friend > has. I'll probably a

Re: [css-d] What in the world

On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 12:53 -0700, Claude Needham wrote: > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:31 PM, David McGlone wrote: > > Hi everyone. > > I've been trying to create a very very simple style sheet and for some > > reason it's not working. I'm so frustrated

Re: [css-d] What in the world

On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 12:53 -0700, Claude Needham wrote: > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:31 PM, David McGlone wrote: > > Hi everyone. > > I've been trying to create a very very simple style sheet and for some > > reason it's not working. I'm so frustrated

Re: [css-d] What in the world

On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:07 -0400, David Laakso wrote: > On 10/15/10 3:31 PM, David McGlone wrote: > > Hi everyone. > > I've been trying to create a very very simple style sheet and for some > > reason it's not working. I'm so frustrated to the point I'

[css-d] What in the world

Hi everyone. I've been trying to create a very very simple style sheet and for some reason it's not working. I'm so frustrated to the point I'm almost P'd off. The problem is I have a wrapper, a left menu, body and a footer. I'm trying to get the body to float next to the left menu, but every time

Re: [css-d] border radius

On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 14:56 -0400, Al Sparber wrote: > From: "David McGlone" > > Hi everyone, I'm having a slight problem with rounded corners in IE and > > need a little help. > > > > I have added this property to my stylesheet but I am not getting th

[css-d] border radius

Hi everyone, I'm having a slight problem with rounded corners in IE and need a little help. I have added this property to my stylesheet but I am not getting the expect behavior with IE. Here is the property: #products { width: 640px; float: left; border: 3px solid green; background: #f9f9f9 url(.

Re: [css-d] General question

On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 11:07 -0400, tedd wrote: > At 7:41 PM -0700 8/21/10, Cheryl Smith wrote: > >When I reply to an email, I get the individual's name instead of the > >list. Do I need to select reply all in which case the individual and > >the list will be sent a message? > > > >Cheryl > > Che

Re: [css-d] 0pt is wrong, right? And IE9 is doom, right?

On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 23:58 +0100, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: > > Nancy wrote: > > Two unrelated questions. > > 1. > > I am working on a website that can be edited by a variety of users using a > > web-based CMS. > > > > The CMS is rewriting inline style property values of zero. > > >

Re: [css-d] IE gets me so upset

On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 18:55 -0700, Michael Geary wrote: > David, I don't know the cause of the problem, but I can offer a > troubleshooting tip or two... > > > First, forget about the content of your .tpl files. They are > completely irrelevant. > > > When troubleshooting a problem with HTML, C

[css-d] IE gets me so upset

Hi guys, I've been working on a really simple style sheet that contains this: .content { width: 750px; float: left; border: 1px solid #ff0; } .content product { float: left; border: 1px solid #ff; margin-bottom: 15px; background: #f9f9f9 url(../../images/product-bg.png) repeat-x; } It

Re: [css-d] Funeral for IE6

David McGlone wrote: > > By the way David, did I ever thank you for the help? If not, then I thank you. > If so, then I just thanked you again. :-) > > >Give credit where credit is due. >on having layout ><http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/onhavinglayout.html> &

Re: [css-d] Funeral for IE6

On Thursday 04 March 2010 15:46:20 nancy wrote: > Since IE6 is being pronounced dead: > http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/03/04/ie6.funeral/index.html?hpt=T2 > I guess we are now being haunted by a ghost. I too can't wait till it dies! I struggled with learning CSS for quite some time I believed my c

Re: [css-d] centering divs within a div...

On Monday 25 January 2010 12:29:52 Michael Beaudoin wrote: > Ok. An easy one for some of you on a Monday, but I'm just not seeing it. > > I have a div (content) and would like to center two other divs > (leftContent and rightContent) within the content div. > > I've tried all the obvious things b

Re: [css-d] Fixed three-column with padding: newbie question

On Sunday 24 January 2010 14:35:24 Chris F.A. Johnson wrote: > On Sun, 24 Jan 2010, David McGlone wrote: > > On Sunday 24 January 2010 13:24:57 Tim Climis wrote: > > > On Sunday, January 24, 2010 1:03:10 pm Doug Niven wrote: > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > >

Re: [css-d] Fixed three-column with padding: newbie question

On Sunday 24 January 2010 13:24:57 Tim Climis wrote: > On Sunday, January 24, 2010 1:03:10 pm Doug Niven wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > > > I'm definitely a newbie, trying to wean myself off tables. > > > > What I need is a 720px wide box with three 240px cells inside it, with > > 10px padding-right for

Re: [css-d] Div that fixed vertically but floated right

On Monday 18 January 2010 06:26:00 Dave M G wrote: > Bobby, > > Thanks for replying. > > > ...you should be able to include it in a relatively positioned wrapper... > > position it absolutely, and create enough right margin on the wrapper > > to accommodate it. > > If I understand your suggesti

Re: [css-d] font differences

On Sunday 10 January 2010 08:30:35 Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > On Jan 10, 2010, at 10:21 PM, David McGlone wrote: > > I'm wondering why I get different results with the following font tags: > > > > body { > > font: 100% 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica,

[css-d] font differences

Hi all, I'm studying up on fonts and I've come across something that piqued my curiosity. I'm wondering why I get different results with the following font tags: body { font: 100% 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; } body { font: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; fo

Re: [css-d] IE6 Layout Issues

On Tuesday 20 October 2009 00:43:40 Rahul Gonsalves wrote: > Hi All, > > Many thanks to David Laakso, who managed to help sort out the jumping > content bug that I posted about on the weekend. > > I have some issues with IE6, on two pages of this website: On opera in the top right corner there is

Re: [css-d] Transparency in IE6 (WAS: Site Check)

On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 21:15 -0400, David Laakso wrote: > David McGlone wrote: > > > >>>>>>> http://www.premierfirst.org > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>

Re: [css-d] Transparency in IE6 (WAS: Site Check)

On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 19:51 -0400, David Laakso wrote: > David McGlone wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-10-10 at 15:13 -0400, David Laakso wrote: > > > >> David McGlone wrote: > >> > >>>> David McGlone wrote: > >>&g

Re: [css-d] Transparency in IE6 (WAS: Site Check)

On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 22:25 -0400, David Laakso wrote: > David McGlone wrote: > > Hi all, Can I get a site check @ http://www.premierfirst.org > > > > I only have Firefox and Opera and IE 8. I am suspecting my images in the > > top left are going to be messed up in IE

Re: [css-d] Site Check

On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 00:49 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > On 2009/10/06 18:44 (GMT-0400) David McGlone composed: > > > Hi all, Can I get a site check @ http://www.premierfirst.org > > > I only have Firefox and Opera and IE 8. I am suspecting my images in the > > top lef

[css-d] Site Check

Hi all, Can I get a site check @ http://www.premierfirst.org I only have Firefox and Opera and IE 8. I am suspecting my images in the top left are going to be messed up in IE6, but I'm pretty confident the layout should be good across all browsers. Blessings David M.

Re: [css-d] shorthand elements

On Monday 28 September 2009 09:09:34 am T. R. Valentine wrote: > When using shorthand elements such as 'margin' or 'padding', the order is > (IIRC) 2 values (top & bottom) (left & right) > 4 values (top) (right) (bottom) (left) > > What about three values? > > Also, does anyone have a mnemonic

Re: [css-d] Hello! background-position RTL

On Sunday 27 September 2009 6:46:05 pm David Laakso wrote: > David McGlone wrote: > > I've been following this thread and have been wondering what the point of > > rtl is. The only thing I can think of is mirroring an image or a similar > > effect. > > > &

Re: [css-d] Hello! background-position RTL

On Sunday 27 September 2009 1:15:02 pm Alan Gresley wrote: > ? wrote: > > Hello! I've just subscribed here. > > > > > > > > I've been working on some project of transforming LTR design into a > > RTL(Right-To-Left) design. > > > > It seems like even when I set the direction to rtl, > > bac

Re: [css-d] An easier way? correction

On Sunday 26 July 2009 09:07:47 pm David Laakso wrote: > David McGlone wrote: > >> My problem is that I cannot seem to arrange the header in IE7, I have > >> not checked in IE8 or IE6. It looks great in firefox. > >> > >> so far in IE7 the words "

Re: [css-d] An easier way? correction

On Sunday 26 July 2009 08:17:01 pm David McGlone wrote: > On Sunday 26 July 2009 05:32:25 pm Bobby Jack wrote: > > --- On Sun, 7/26/09, David McGlone wrote: > > > I know everyone here prefers that when a question is asked, > > > that the poster upload an example on t

Re: [css-d] An easier way?

On Sunday 26 July 2009 05:32:25 pm Bobby Jack wrote: > --- On Sun, 7/26/09, David McGlone wrote: > > I know everyone here prefers that when a question is asked, > > that the poster upload an example on the web. > > > > Well is there any other way this could be accomplis

[css-d] An easier way?

Hi everyone, I know everyone here prefers that when a question is asked, that the poster upload an example on the web. Well is there any other way this could be accomplished? In order for me to put the work i've done on the internet would take too long because of the databases etc, etc. -- B

Re: [css-d] Anchor Tags and Absolute Positioning

On Thursday 23 July 2009 04:22:12 pm Deborah Lundgren wrote: > Hello, > > I am using this code to position my menu. It works beautifully positioning > the menu to the right spot but the problem is that the rest of the page > looses the anchor tags in all the browsers except IE. > > http://www.css-d

Re: [css-d] stand-down

On Wednesday 22 July 2009 06:03:57 pm David Laakso wrote: > Ron Zisman wrote: > > david, > > > > i'm glad you took my comments in the spirit intended. design is > > greatly subjective. > > so i have no idea of whether or not they have any value. > > > > rgds, > > ron > > >

Re: [css-d] stand-down

On Wednesday 22 July 2009 08:29:08 pm Felix Miata wrote: > On 2009/07/22 19:41 (GMT-0400) David Laakso composed: > > Ron Zisman wrote: > >> i want to see the whole damn page. > > > > re: > > > > Then you will need to purchase a monitor for me so that I c

Re: [css-d] What would you do to improve css?

On Wednesday 22 July 2009 02:19:50 pm Leszek Stachowski wrote: > Hi! > That's my first activity in here, so forgive anything wrong I could do :) > > I've got a simple question for you: what would you change in css ? What > annoys you ? What repeatable action would you replace with another ? > > I'm

Re: [css-d] stand-down

On Wednesday 22 July 2009 01:29:04 pm Don Miller wrote: > > David Laakso wrote: > >> Dawn will arrive soon enough. > > > > And I can't wait. > > > >> In the meantime, your comments and suggestions -- thus far -- are always > >> welcome. > >> > >> Best, > >> Westmoreland > >>

Re: [css-d] "Posting 101"

On Monday 13 July 2009 11:31:21 am Brian Curran wrote: > Can someone give me the "Posting 101" on why my > post was one long run-on line of text? I use Outlook, > if that impacts anything??? > > I'll get up to speed. Please bare with me. It may be your word wrap. I believe the standard is 78. --

Re: [css-d] [off-topic] Matilde, a new future member of css-d

On Sunday 28 June 2009 04:21:34 am Gabriele Romanato wrote: > At 8:34 AM of Saturday, 28 June 2009, my little nephew Matilde was born. > I'd like to share my happiness with you, because I regard > you as my extended family. I hope she'll become involved with the web when > she's older.. but not a n

Re: [css-d] Reviewing work

On Thursday 23 April 2009 9:46:05 pm jason...@comcast.net wrote: > I have been working on making a website for my church. I had found this > template on free css templates called premiumseries. I am wondering if > someone could look over the page that I've made so far and let me know how > it looks

Re: [css-d] Improper Float

On Wednesday 18 March 2009 10:40:51 am Wayne Wickson wrote: > Being new to CSS and tying to design my first page, I have run out of ideas > as to why the "First Paragraph" div (green background/white border) will > not float up on the right side of this page beside the menu/list on the > left side

Re: [css-d] Hunting a peek-a-boo bug in IE8rc1

On Sunday 08 March 2009 3:35:44 pm Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > Hey all, > > I'm trying to catch a bug in IE8rc1, hoping it can be found and killed > before they release IE8 final. > > Bugnote: > ...and this bug randomly makes the footer on all my reg

Re: [css-d] Opera causing images...

On Thursday 26 February 2009 2:20:37 pm Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > David McGlone wrote: > > On Monday 23 February 2009 5:42:58 pm David Laakso wrote: > >> David McGlone wrote: > >>> What could be causing opera to make images overflow instead of > >>&g

Re: [css-d] Opera causing images...

On Monday 23 February 2009 5:42:58 pm David Laakso wrote: > David McGlone wrote: > > What could be causing opera to make images overflow instead of wrapping > > to the next line? > > > > > > David M. > > Can you provide a clickable link to the page? Sorr

[css-d] Opera causing images...

Hi all, What could be causing opera to make images overflow instead of wrapping to the next line? I have some thumbnails on a page inside these #div's #contents { width: 509px; float: left; text-align: left; padding: 0px 20px 15px 1em; } #contents2 { margin: 0px 0px 10px 15px; } The im

Re: [css-d] good tutorials

On Friday 20 February 2009 8:32:52 am Virgilio Quilario wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've been browsing the web for a few days looking at css tutorials, but I > > thought I would ask the list if they knew of any good ones that I may > > have missed. I'm looking for something that goes in depth with >

[css-d] good tutorials

Hi all, I've been browsing the web for a few days looking at css tutorials, but I thought I would ask the list if they knew of any good ones that I may have missed. I'm looking for something that goes in depth with explanation, not tutorials. Also, I've been looking for a good PHP/CSS IDE prog

Re: [css-d] testing layouts

On Wednesday 04 February 2009 5:42:43 pm David Laakso wrote: > David McGlone wrote: > > It bugs me to no end when positioning something and it isn't exact in > > none of the browsers, some a little off, some way off. > > Forgot-- > > Code to compliant browsers, amo

[css-d] testing layouts

Hi everyone, I have a question about techniques. What I'm wondering is how everyone tests their layouts when not every browser and resolution is available. I'm running Kubuntu with Firefox and Opera running on 1440x900 resolution and I also check on my laptop running Win XP with IE V. 6.0. wi

Re: [css-d] Firefox Weirdness

On Sunday 01 February 2009 7:19:25 pm Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > Jerod Venema wrote: > > http://frozenmountain.com/team.aspx > > > > in FF (3), and check out the "Length of Service: 9 Years", you'll > > notice that the "s" is slightly cut off. > > Seems to be OS related one way or another. > > FF3.0.5

Re: [css-d] text positioning

On Friday 30 January 2009 9:26:46 pm David Laakso wrote: > David McGlone wrote: > > I've been doing a lot of CSS coding lately and I'm having a slight > > problem with text positioning. I cannot seem to position any of the words > > after the first word. > &g

Re: [css-d] text positioning

On Friday 30 January 2009 9:26:46 pm David Laakso wrote: > David McGlone wrote: > > I've been doing a lot of CSS coding lately and I'm having a slight > > problem with text positioning. I cannot seem to position any of the words > > after the first word. > &g

Re: [css-d] text positioning

On Friday 30 January 2009 9:01:39 am Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > David McGlone wrote: > > You're correct. I make changes and look at it with firefox. I'm aware > > it probably will not look the same in different versions of IE, > > Opera, etc, but I haven't figu

Re: [css-d] text positioning

On Thursday 29 January 2009 9:31:54 pm you wrote: > David McGlone wrote: > > I'm thinking that even though there are more than 1 words, closing > > the tag after each word does not make it a whole new box that can be > > moved individually. > > > > Am I think

[css-d] text positioning

Hi everyone. I've been doing a lot of CSS coding lately and I'm having a slight problem with text positioning. I cannot seem to position any of the words after the first word. Here's the code I'm using: #text { padding: 0px 0px 10px 5px; position: relative; left: 10px; bottom: 2px; top: 2px; fo