http://into.tipadvisor.co
Tonglili8038
__
css-discuss [css-d@css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.ht
Listers,
Seems like an old issue, but I can't seem to find what I need.
I am using some web fonts from a service and am looking for recommendations
on avoiding incorrect font rendering in browsers.
I am including their css file in the head of my page, which has
the @font-face declarations withou
I'm not sure about this but looking at the font list I'm thinking that all the
fallback fonts would work OK the way you want, but that double bolding might
occur on the Helvetica Neue because you specify a bold weight then the 700 of
that bold weight. So you're bolding the bold, as it were.
re
For fonts that come with their own bold glyphs, I use normal font-weight
declaration.
Best,
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
> On May 11, 2018, at 2:57 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> Listers,
>
> Seems like an old issue, but I can't seem to find what I need.
>
> I am u
Just to add to that. If I am using fonts that have their own font boldness and
I need a 700 weight,
I get fonts that include a 700 weight as its own font or I use the regular font
and add my bold or 700 weight there.
If the fonts that come with boldness does not have a 700 weight, I choose a
d
> On May 12, 2018, at 4:57, Tom Livingston wrote:
>
> I am including their css file in the head of my page, which has
> the @font-face declarations without font-weight, etc. then reference a font
> like this:
>
> b{
>font-family:'HelveticaNeueW01-75Bold', Arial, Helmet, Freesans,
> Helveti
