Re: [css-d] nested ULs IE oddity

2017-10-20 Thread Tom Livingston
I was able to solve this only by adding list-style:none as an inline style on the offending ULs. Ah, IE... On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > >> On Oct 20, 2017, at 1:11 AM, Tom Livingston wrote: >> >> Early build progress at this page: >> >> https://tomliv.com/css-

Re: [css-d] nested ULs IE oddity

2017-10-20 Thread Karl DeSaulniers
!important didn't work? Best, Karl Sent from losPhone > On Oct 20, 2017, at 10:42 AM, Tom Livingston wrote: > > I was able to solve this only by adding list-style:none as an inline > style on the offending ULs. Ah, IE... > > > >> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh >> wr

Re: [css-d] nested ULs IE oddity

2017-10-20 Thread Tom Livingston
It did not. It seems to be quite random, as a change like adding !important worked in one place, but not another. inline style seems to be the most reliable. On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > !important didn't work? > > Best, > Karl > > Sent from losPhone > >> On Oct 20,

Re: [css-d] nested ULs IE oddity

2017-10-20 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
> On Oct 21, 2017, at 12:42 AM, Tom Livingston wrote: > > I was able to solve this only by adding list-style:none as an inline > style on the offending ULs. Ah, IE… Didn’t it work with the list-stye-image hack I gave? That never failed for me (both Edge and IE 11 and older, given how long it h