Re: [css-d] Flex issue/question

2019-03-05 Thread Vince Aggrippino
On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 4:55 AM Tom Livingston wrote: > > Hello listers, > > Is it possible to do the following with flexbox? > > mobile (just a stack, no flex yet): > 1 > 2 > 3 > > desktop (two-column with different order): > 2 1 > 3 > > Struggling with this... > TIA @media (

Re: [css-d] Has Chrome for Windows invalidated earlier CSS and HTML standards?

2019-01-07 Thread Vince Aggrippino
299px is transparent, the "charcoal" background color shows through. Without the "no-repeat" option, it would repeat the white part down the page at increments equaling exactly the height of the viewport. -- Vince On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 7:13 AM Vince Aggrippino wrote: > >

Re: [css-d] Has Chrome for Windows invalidated earlier CSS and HTML standards?

2019-01-07 Thread Vince Aggrippino
t is intended to always be in the background I might even set a negative z-index value, but the default value should be fine for this site. -- Vince On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 5:07 AM Vince Aggrippino wrote: > > I'm also able to reproduce this if I download your code locally and just run

Re: [css-d] Has Chrome for Windows invalidated earlier CSS and HTML standards?

2019-01-07 Thread Vince Aggrippino
I'm also able to reproduce this if I download your code locally and just run it off of my hard drive. I even see it if I reduce your CSS to just the style on the body tag. My time is limited right now, so I can't fully investigate this, but it looks to me like it's the image itself that Chrome is h