rce, that is some assurance
> against cheating.
Be careful. You give me a physical source's power spectrum, I'll give
you a digital filter to color the PRNG to match.
--
Eli Brandt | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~eli/
tor size) ).
No asymptotic edge either way; attacker wins against bounded cap size.
--
Eli Brandt | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~eli/
s
you would in a power supply.
--
Eli Brandt | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~eli/
ess
arcane than running into the pathological cases constructed to prove
these undecidability theorems.
> Your argument reminds me of claims I always
> hear that nothing can be measured because of the Heisenberg
> Uncertainty principle.
I do feel your pain.
--
Eli Brandt | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~eli/
ut that reduction is in the wrong
direction: I need to show that if you can answer Thompson(M) you can
answer Thompson'(L), not the other way around. Which, when one stops
waving one's hands and thinks about it, is not going to happen, not
without drawing on some information about Thompson().
--
Eli Brandt | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~eli/
fiers, sure, for any program there exists a
decision procedure -- either the decider that always says "yes" or the
one that always says "no". (Okay, I see why you don't find theory
relevant.)
--
Eli Brandt | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~eli/
