ogging any invalid packets received (modulo
error detection/correction?) and studying them carefully, there should be
no difficulty detecting such a condition.
David R. Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"On two occasions I have been asked [by members of Parliament!], `Pray,
Mr. Babbage, if you put i
e a
concern for you. But if you're using RSA, DSS, Elliptic Curve, or the
like, then it's something you need to think about.
David R. Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"On two occasions I have been asked [by members of Parliament!], `Pray,
Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong
navoidable.
> ... PLAINTEXT, not just the key. That could present problems for
> crypto-protection by multi-jurisdictional key-splitting applications.
>
> Clearly, this has to be nailed down. It could get ugly.
Certainly we should find out exactly what they mean, although as you know
fa
ero bit in
the flags, well, you can't exactly make moving the flags into the
accumulator a privileged instruction.
I did a little digging on www.x86.org and didn't come up with anything.
Anyone with further details on this, I would really love to see them.
David R. Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This is why I love America -- that any kid can dream "I'm going to get
naked with the President" ... and that dream can actually come true.
What a great country! -- Michael Moore
, "Fail Utterly". If the "noisy diode"
or whatever is at the heart of this goes dark, it should start producing a
steady stream of 0's. Failure has to be obvious, and no attempt should be
made to try to limp along if trouble arises.
David R. Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ssumptions underlying cryptography".
[1] You can verb any word in the English language. :-)
David R. Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This is why I love America -- that any kid can dream "I'm going to get
naked with the President" ... and that dream can actually come true
Hi,
Quick question: does anyone know of technology or techniques that would
facilitate strong authentication (_not_ encryption) for unattended high
volume electronic transactions and does not require strong crypto along
the lines of DSA or RSA? Shared secrets are not an option.
Thanks,
-drc
ll, it irks me
whenever I think about it.
Lastly, to forestall confusion, I'd like to make clear that I'm no
relation to the "David R. Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" who posted to the
list recently (passing odd, that).
David R. Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP keys (0x1993E
ase as the
user types it. Anyone know what criteria they use?
[1]:
> >| ... the Diceware page http://world.std.com/~reinhold/diceware.html
> >| ...
> >| Arnold Reinhold
David R. Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP keys (0x1993E1AE and 0xA0B83D31):
DSS Fingerprint20 = 9942 E27C
an iterated hash, instead of a function designed
to maximize the resource usage, may be hardware-speed-uppable and
embarrassingly parallelizable, but it's much less likely that someone
could find an equivalent, simpler calculation.
> 3. PGP should be available on a bootable CD-ROM for t
urn printf("\n")-1;
}
-=-=- randpwd.c -=-=-
'return printf("\n")-1;', hey I said it was slightly obfuscated. :-)
Coderpunks write cyphe, or something.
David R. Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP keys (0x1993E1AE and 0xA0B83D31):
DSS F
character occurance frequency than the Army FM does.
Thanks for this link.
David R. Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP keys (0x1993E1AE and 0xA0B83D31):
DSS Fingerprint20 = 9942 E27C 3966 9FB8 5058 73A4 83CE 62EF 1993 E1AE
RSA Fingerprint16 = 1D F2 F3 90 DA CA 35 5D 91 E4 09 45 95 C8 20 F1
Hi,
> The way I read it, if you are using RSA for authentication, there are no
> export restrictions (except perhaps the awful 5 nations). You do not need
> to get a license.
The regulations, as written, do seem to imply this. However, in
practice, it isn't that simple. For example, one imple
Hi,
> 5. The Federal Government attaches importance to international
>cooperation on encryption policy. It encourages market-driven,
>open standards and interoperable systems and will work to
>strengthen multilateral and bilateral cooperation.
Does this mean the German government wi
Hi,
Because they want you to agree to their licensing terms for the specification,
the executive summary of which would most likely be:
"... the Specification is provided to you solely for your informational
purposes (for review as specified above) and, pursuant to this Agreement,
Microsoft does
> There is an article (somewhere) on the net of digital cameras focused
> on lava lamps.
This is patented by Bob Mende of SGI.
Rgds,
-drc
16 matches
Mail list logo
